A scoping review on the operationalization of intersectional health research methods in studies related to the COVID-19 pandemic
A scoping review on the operationalization of intersectional health research methods in studies related to the COVID-19 pandemic
Purpose: the COVID-19 pandemic began in early 2020 and became a global health crisis with devastating impacts. This scoping review maps the key findings of research about the pandemic that has operationalized intersectional research methods around the world. It also tracks how these studies have engaged with methodological tenets of oppression, comparison, relationality, complexity, and deconstruction.
Methods: our search resulted in 14,487 articles, 5164 of which were duplicates, and 9297 studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded. In total, 14 articles were included in this review. We used thematic analysis to analyse themes within this work and Misra et al. (2021) intersectional research framework to analyse the uptake of intersectional methods within such studies.
Results: the research related to the COVID-19 pandemic globally is paying attention to issues around the financial impacts of the pandemic, discrimination, gendered impacts, impacts of and on social ties, and implications for mental health. We also found strong uptake of centring research in the context of oppression, but less attention is being paid to comparison, relationality, complexity, and deconstruction.
Conclusions: our findings show the importance of intersectional research within public health policy formation, as well as room for greater rigour in the use of intersectional methods.
COVID-19, Intersectionality, intersectional methods, public health, scoping review
Olanlesi-Aliu, Adedoyin
3b4715f0-6ed7-413e-8050-ba49ff6b4cd4
Tulli, Mia
f9420b67-59e0-410e-a4f1-837fc2a10a4f
Kemei, Janet
621af97a-a98c-4e12-b579-dc7d3859646b
Bonifacio, Glenda
22ef399e-cd74-420d-9ccd-0dd5afe194f4
Reif, Linda C.
ed0c604c-b888-418d-bfd4-feed57d2e608
Cardo, Valentina
87fafbf1-f6c0-4454-a39a-9173d7bd7f5e
Roche, Hannah
a2de3766-f203-4467-8c25-23d55ff84096
Hurley, Natasha
033b019b-99fe-4172-a363-d8b162d49780
Salami, Bukola
d5785d51-ed87-4ad6-a247-840391b332c8
Olanlesi-Aliu, Adedoyin
3b4715f0-6ed7-413e-8050-ba49ff6b4cd4
Tulli, Mia
f9420b67-59e0-410e-a4f1-837fc2a10a4f
Kemei, Janet
621af97a-a98c-4e12-b579-dc7d3859646b
Bonifacio, Glenda
22ef399e-cd74-420d-9ccd-0dd5afe194f4
Reif, Linda C.
ed0c604c-b888-418d-bfd4-feed57d2e608
Cardo, Valentina
87fafbf1-f6c0-4454-a39a-9173d7bd7f5e
Roche, Hannah
a2de3766-f203-4467-8c25-23d55ff84096
Hurley, Natasha
033b019b-99fe-4172-a363-d8b162d49780
Salami, Bukola
d5785d51-ed87-4ad6-a247-840391b332c8
Olanlesi-Aliu, Adedoyin, Tulli, Mia, Kemei, Janet, Bonifacio, Glenda, Reif, Linda C., Cardo, Valentina, Roche, Hannah, Hurley, Natasha and Salami, Bukola
(2024)
A scoping review on the operationalization of intersectional health research methods in studies related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 19 (1), [2302305].
(doi:10.1080/17482631.2024.2302305).
Abstract
Purpose: the COVID-19 pandemic began in early 2020 and became a global health crisis with devastating impacts. This scoping review maps the key findings of research about the pandemic that has operationalized intersectional research methods around the world. It also tracks how these studies have engaged with methodological tenets of oppression, comparison, relationality, complexity, and deconstruction.
Methods: our search resulted in 14,487 articles, 5164 of which were duplicates, and 9297 studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded. In total, 14 articles were included in this review. We used thematic analysis to analyse themes within this work and Misra et al. (2021) intersectional research framework to analyse the uptake of intersectional methods within such studies.
Results: the research related to the COVID-19 pandemic globally is paying attention to issues around the financial impacts of the pandemic, discrimination, gendered impacts, impacts of and on social ties, and implications for mental health. We also found strong uptake of centring research in the context of oppression, but less attention is being paid to comparison, relationality, complexity, and deconstruction.
Conclusions: our findings show the importance of intersectional research within public health policy formation, as well as room for greater rigour in the use of intersectional methods.
Text
A scoping review on the operationalization of intersectional health research methods in studies related to the COVID-19 pandemic
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 3 January 2024
e-pub ahead of print date: 11 January 2024
Additional Information:
Funding Information:
This work was supported by University of Alberta, Edmonton Canada.
Keywords:
COVID-19, Intersectionality, intersectional methods, public health, scoping review
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 486449
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/486449
PURE UUID: 92376d8a-869f-450a-9226-16ca2c710596
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 22 Jan 2024 17:59
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:34
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Adedoyin Olanlesi-Aliu
Author:
Mia Tulli
Author:
Janet Kemei
Author:
Glenda Bonifacio
Author:
Linda C. Reif
Author:
Hannah Roche
Author:
Natasha Hurley
Author:
Bukola Salami
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics