Functionally discrete fine roots differ in microbial assembly, microbial functional potential, and produced metabolites
Functionally discrete fine roots differ in microbial assembly, microbial functional potential, and produced metabolites
Traditionally, fine roots were grouped using arbitrary size categories, rarely capturing the heterogeneity in physiology, morphology and functionality among different fine root orders. Fine roots with different functional roles are rarely separated in microbiome-focused studies and may result in confounding microbial signals and host-filtering across different root microbiome compartments. Using a 26-year-old common garden, we sampled fine roots from four temperate tree species that varied in root morphology and sorted them into absorptive and transportive fine roots. The rhizoplane and rhizosphere were characterized using 16S rRNA gene and internal transcribed spacer region amplicon sequencing and shotgun metagenomics for the rhizoplane to identify potential microbial functions. Fine roots were subject to metabolomics to spatially characterize resource availability. Both fungi and bacteria differed according to root functional type. We observed additional differences between the bacterial rhizoplane and rhizosphere compartments for absorptive but not transportive fine roots. Rhizoplane bacteria, as well as the root metabolome and potential microbial functions, differed between absorptive and transportive fine roots, but not the rhizosphere bacteria. Functional differences were driven by sugar transport, peptidases and urea transport. Our data highlights the importance of root function when examining root-microbial relationships, emphasizing different host selective pressures imparted on different root microbiome compartments.
microbial functions, rhizoplane, rhizosphere, root microbiome, root order, root physiology, spatial colonization
3919-3932
King, William L.
0bd4328a-34ba-4b9a-bf4e-1442c18c43fc
Yates, Caylon F.
3fcb4ec9-4250-4ddf-b3f2-e29002d90ef0
Cao, Lily
1404c419-9782-4cd1-b010-12491bb1cdea
O'Rourke-Ibach, Sean
b5a44e07-9f2c-40c4-82b2-3a491a89faa2
Fleishman, Suzanne M.
88ee624b-af52-4918-be7c-c8d4ad15b0c7
Richards, Sarah C.
ba7e0707-3e1c-43aa-a72e-0623abb12c18
Centinari, Michela
59a42090-5ebc-4f41-abca-e68dbfe19c41
Hafner, Benjamin D.
80dfe241-7e05-476d-bc6e-14df58bfc2eb
Goebel, Marc
1470f88e-8a1d-41c0-87e4-4af6189c57dd
Bauerle, Taryn
6abf1d22-38e2-45bc-9e44-de2e128e5349
Kim, Young Mo
fc2d8597-125f-4f29-b15e-bdfba65b04f9
Nicora, Carrie D.
418b9a84-cb34-4ed2-8f41-acead95d8e95
Anderton, Christopher R.
1117fcac-c34a-485f-af36-ad5b85fae98d
Eissenstat, David M.
09aec4a5-7252-49da-9aab-6fcecb19fd0f
Bell, Terrence H.
29863b8c-a89c-4077-b22d-62052cfb7225
7 September 2023
King, William L.
0bd4328a-34ba-4b9a-bf4e-1442c18c43fc
Yates, Caylon F.
3fcb4ec9-4250-4ddf-b3f2-e29002d90ef0
Cao, Lily
1404c419-9782-4cd1-b010-12491bb1cdea
O'Rourke-Ibach, Sean
b5a44e07-9f2c-40c4-82b2-3a491a89faa2
Fleishman, Suzanne M.
88ee624b-af52-4918-be7c-c8d4ad15b0c7
Richards, Sarah C.
ba7e0707-3e1c-43aa-a72e-0623abb12c18
Centinari, Michela
59a42090-5ebc-4f41-abca-e68dbfe19c41
Hafner, Benjamin D.
80dfe241-7e05-476d-bc6e-14df58bfc2eb
Goebel, Marc
1470f88e-8a1d-41c0-87e4-4af6189c57dd
Bauerle, Taryn
6abf1d22-38e2-45bc-9e44-de2e128e5349
Kim, Young Mo
fc2d8597-125f-4f29-b15e-bdfba65b04f9
Nicora, Carrie D.
418b9a84-cb34-4ed2-8f41-acead95d8e95
Anderton, Christopher R.
1117fcac-c34a-485f-af36-ad5b85fae98d
Eissenstat, David M.
09aec4a5-7252-49da-9aab-6fcecb19fd0f
Bell, Terrence H.
29863b8c-a89c-4077-b22d-62052cfb7225
King, William L., Yates, Caylon F., Cao, Lily, O'Rourke-Ibach, Sean, Fleishman, Suzanne M., Richards, Sarah C., Centinari, Michela, Hafner, Benjamin D., Goebel, Marc, Bauerle, Taryn, Kim, Young Mo, Nicora, Carrie D., Anderton, Christopher R., Eissenstat, David M. and Bell, Terrence H.
(2023)
Functionally discrete fine roots differ in microbial assembly, microbial functional potential, and produced metabolites.
Plant Cell and Environment, 46 (12), .
(doi:10.1111/pce.14705).
Abstract
Traditionally, fine roots were grouped using arbitrary size categories, rarely capturing the heterogeneity in physiology, morphology and functionality among different fine root orders. Fine roots with different functional roles are rarely separated in microbiome-focused studies and may result in confounding microbial signals and host-filtering across different root microbiome compartments. Using a 26-year-old common garden, we sampled fine roots from four temperate tree species that varied in root morphology and sorted them into absorptive and transportive fine roots. The rhizoplane and rhizosphere were characterized using 16S rRNA gene and internal transcribed spacer region amplicon sequencing and shotgun metagenomics for the rhizoplane to identify potential microbial functions. Fine roots were subject to metabolomics to spatially characterize resource availability. Both fungi and bacteria differed according to root functional type. We observed additional differences between the bacterial rhizoplane and rhizosphere compartments for absorptive but not transportive fine roots. Rhizoplane bacteria, as well as the root metabolome and potential microbial functions, differed between absorptive and transportive fine roots, but not the rhizosphere bacteria. Functional differences were driven by sugar transport, peptidases and urea transport. Our data highlights the importance of root function when examining root-microbial relationships, emphasizing different host selective pressures imparted on different root microbiome compartments.
Text
Plant Cell Environment - 2023 - King - Functionally discrete fine roots differ in microbial assembly microbial
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 18 August 2023
Published date: 7 September 2023
Additional Information:
Funding Information:
This research was supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) Federal Appropriation under Project #PEN0 4628 (Accession #1014131), Project #PEN0 4744 (Accession #1023222) and Project #PEN0 4651 (Accession #1016233). Analysis and writing were partly supported by USDA ORG Project PENW‐2019‐03513 and the National Science Foundation (NSF) Centre for Research on Programmable Plant Systems (CROPPS; Grant number #DBI‐2019674). A portion of this research was performed on a project award (doi. org/10.46936/ltds. proj.2021.60134/60000418 awarded to WLK, THB and DME) from the Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, a DOE Office of Science User Facility sponsored by the Biological and Environmental Research program under Contract No. DE‐AC05‐76RLO 1830. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory is a multiprogram national laboratory operated by Battelle for the US DOE under contract DE‐AC05‐76RLO 1830.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Plant, Cell & Environment published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Keywords:
microbial functions, rhizoplane, rhizosphere, root microbiome, root order, root physiology, spatial colonization
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 486536
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/486536
ISSN: 0140-7791
PURE UUID: 7e201026-813b-4364-85d9-edcb2a165cec
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 25 Jan 2024 17:35
Last modified: 12 Jul 2024 02:16
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
William L. King
Author:
Caylon F. Yates
Author:
Lily Cao
Author:
Sean O'Rourke-Ibach
Author:
Suzanne M. Fleishman
Author:
Sarah C. Richards
Author:
Michela Centinari
Author:
Benjamin D. Hafner
Author:
Marc Goebel
Author:
Taryn Bauerle
Author:
Young Mo Kim
Author:
Carrie D. Nicora
Author:
Christopher R. Anderton
Author:
David M. Eissenstat
Author:
Terrence H. Bell
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics