Investigating the sustainability of careers in academic primary care: a UK survey
Investigating the sustainability of careers in academic primary care: a UK survey
Background: the UK National Health Service (NHS) is undergoing institutional reorganisation due to the Health and Social Care Act-2012 with a continued restriction on funding within the NHS and clinically focused academic institutions. The UK Society for Academic Primary Care (SAPC) is examining the sustainability of academic primary care careers within this climate and preliminary qualitative work has highlighted individual and organisational barriers. This study seeks to quantify the current situation for academics within primary care.
Methods: a survey of academic primary care staff was undertaken. Fifty-three academic primary care departments were selected. Members were invited to complete a survey which contained questions about an individual’s career, clarity of career pathways, organisational culture, and general experience of working within the area. Data were analysed descriptively with cross-tabulations between survey responses and career position (early, mid-level, senior), disciplinary background (medical, scientist), and gender. Pearson chi-square test was used to determine likelihood that any observed difference between the sets arose by chance.
Results: responses were received from 217 people. Career pathways were unclear for the majority of people (64%) and 43% of the workforce felt that the next step in their career was unclear. This was higher in women (52% vs. men 25%; χ2(3) = 14.76; p = 0.002) and higher in those in early career (50% vs. senior career, 25%) and mid-career(45%; vs. senior career; χ2(6) = 29.19, p
Conclusions: sustainability of a academic primary care career is undermined by unclear pathways and a lack of promotion. If the discipline is to thrive, there is a need to support early and mid-career individuals via greater transparency of career pathways. Despite these findings staff remained positive about their careers.
Calitri, Raff
167ff841-9315-455e-9887-73eaf2195de7
Adams, Ann
d77dc6f3-356a-4ce8-b17d-1ef8402c6425
Atherton, Helen
9bb8932e-7bb7-4781-ab97-114613de99b1
Reeve, Joanne
15cfcc9a-32f1-4ee3-b3a3-502ff060d3cd
Hill, Nathan R.
d3890503-1f34-44d0-980f-d227d73f8ac8
14 December 2014
Calitri, Raff
167ff841-9315-455e-9887-73eaf2195de7
Adams, Ann
d77dc6f3-356a-4ce8-b17d-1ef8402c6425
Atherton, Helen
9bb8932e-7bb7-4781-ab97-114613de99b1
Reeve, Joanne
15cfcc9a-32f1-4ee3-b3a3-502ff060d3cd
Hill, Nathan R.
d3890503-1f34-44d0-980f-d227d73f8ac8
Calitri, Raff, Adams, Ann, Atherton, Helen, Reeve, Joanne and Hill, Nathan R.
(2014)
Investigating the sustainability of careers in academic primary care: a UK survey.
BMC Family Practice, 15 (1), [205].
(doi:10.1186/s12875-014-0205-6).
Abstract
Background: the UK National Health Service (NHS) is undergoing institutional reorganisation due to the Health and Social Care Act-2012 with a continued restriction on funding within the NHS and clinically focused academic institutions. The UK Society for Academic Primary Care (SAPC) is examining the sustainability of academic primary care careers within this climate and preliminary qualitative work has highlighted individual and organisational barriers. This study seeks to quantify the current situation for academics within primary care.
Methods: a survey of academic primary care staff was undertaken. Fifty-three academic primary care departments were selected. Members were invited to complete a survey which contained questions about an individual’s career, clarity of career pathways, organisational culture, and general experience of working within the area. Data were analysed descriptively with cross-tabulations between survey responses and career position (early, mid-level, senior), disciplinary background (medical, scientist), and gender. Pearson chi-square test was used to determine likelihood that any observed difference between the sets arose by chance.
Results: responses were received from 217 people. Career pathways were unclear for the majority of people (64%) and 43% of the workforce felt that the next step in their career was unclear. This was higher in women (52% vs. men 25%; χ2(3) = 14.76; p = 0.002) and higher in those in early career (50% vs. senior career, 25%) and mid-career(45%; vs. senior career; χ2(6) = 29.19, p
Conclusions: sustainability of a academic primary care career is undermined by unclear pathways and a lack of promotion. If the discipline is to thrive, there is a need to support early and mid-career individuals via greater transparency of career pathways. Despite these findings staff remained positive about their careers.
Text
s12875-014-0205-6
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 2 December 2014
Published date: 14 December 2014
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 486571
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/486571
ISSN: 1471-2296
PURE UUID: 0d8e3d7e-d5c0-4ed8-94bb-658bab2b744f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 26 Jan 2024 17:39
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:18
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Raff Calitri
Author:
Ann Adams
Author:
Helen Atherton
Author:
Joanne Reeve
Author:
Nathan R. Hill
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics