The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Analysis of England's incident and mental health nursing workforce data 2015-2022

Analysis of England's incident and mental health nursing workforce data 2015-2022
Analysis of England's incident and mental health nursing workforce data 2015-2022

What is known on the subject?: Mental health services report adverse incidents in different ways and the relationship between adverse incidents and the workforce is uncertain. In England, there are national datasets recording all incidents and workforce statistics though there is no peer-reviewed evidence examining recent trends. What this paper adds to existing knowledge?: Although there has been an overall increase in the number of mental health nurses, more are working in the community and the number of nurses relative to adverse incidents has decreased. There have been service-provision changes but the role of mental health nurses has not significantly changed in this period, and we can therefore assume that their current practice is saturated with risk or increased reporting. To help understand the relationship between nurses and incidents, we need to transform how incidents are recorded in England. What are the implications for practice?: English mental health services report greater levels of patient-related factors such as self-harm or aggression rather than missed or erroneous care. This makes it difficult to understand if a rise in incident frequency is linked to reporting behaviour, patient risk, unsafe/ineffective care or other reasons and therefore planning workforce deployment to improve care quality is problematic. Abstract: Introduction: There is a paucity of empirical data examining incidents and mental health nurses and the relationship between the two remains uncertain. Aim: Comparison of English national data for incidents and nursing workforce to examine recent trends. Method: Descriptive analysis of two national datasets of incidents and workforce data for England between 2015 and 2022. Results: A 46% increase in incidents was found; the leading causes are self-harm and aggressive behaviour. Despite the rise in adverse incident reporting, a 6% increase in mental health nurses was found, with more nurses in community settings than hospitals. Discussion: Current services are incident reporting at greater concentrations than in previous years. Patient-related behaviour continues to be most prominently reported, rather than possible antecedent health services issues that may contribute to reporting. Whilst staffing has increased, this does not seem to have kept pace with the implied workload evident in the increase in incident reports. Implications for Practice: Greater emphasis should be placed on health service behaviour in reporting mechanisms. Self-harm and aggression should continue to be considered adverse outcomes, but causal health service factors, such as missed care, should be present in pooled reporting to help reduce the occurrence of adverse outcomes.

mental health nursing, quality of care, seclusion and restraint, self-harm, staffing levels, staffing/resources, statistical methods
1351-0126
Woodnutt, Samuel
dbb6678a-2b2b-4e7c-9a12-f9d838555116
Hall, Simon
734099e5-1bf8-4a64-9440-96805ca3459b
Libberton, Paula
d6c21e87-26b1-4842-bb74-d897de7dba14
Flynn, Matt
5a7c40b8-eb0d-4d80-9793-08a1c3254ebc
Purvis, Francesca
b42c5cce-4b59-4515-9681-56991221f034
Snowden, Jasmine
b19720c9-d6e0-4208-b145-60fecfa3760e
Woodnutt, Samuel
dbb6678a-2b2b-4e7c-9a12-f9d838555116
Hall, Simon
734099e5-1bf8-4a64-9440-96805ca3459b
Libberton, Paula
d6c21e87-26b1-4842-bb74-d897de7dba14
Flynn, Matt
5a7c40b8-eb0d-4d80-9793-08a1c3254ebc
Purvis, Francesca
b42c5cce-4b59-4515-9681-56991221f034
Snowden, Jasmine
b19720c9-d6e0-4208-b145-60fecfa3760e

Woodnutt, Samuel, Hall, Simon, Libberton, Paula, Flynn, Matt, Purvis, Francesca and Snowden, Jasmine (2024) Analysis of England's incident and mental health nursing workforce data 2015-2022. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. (doi:10.1111/jpm.13027).

Record type: Article

Abstract

What is known on the subject?: Mental health services report adverse incidents in different ways and the relationship between adverse incidents and the workforce is uncertain. In England, there are national datasets recording all incidents and workforce statistics though there is no peer-reviewed evidence examining recent trends. What this paper adds to existing knowledge?: Although there has been an overall increase in the number of mental health nurses, more are working in the community and the number of nurses relative to adverse incidents has decreased. There have been service-provision changes but the role of mental health nurses has not significantly changed in this period, and we can therefore assume that their current practice is saturated with risk or increased reporting. To help understand the relationship between nurses and incidents, we need to transform how incidents are recorded in England. What are the implications for practice?: English mental health services report greater levels of patient-related factors such as self-harm or aggression rather than missed or erroneous care. This makes it difficult to understand if a rise in incident frequency is linked to reporting behaviour, patient risk, unsafe/ineffective care or other reasons and therefore planning workforce deployment to improve care quality is problematic. Abstract: Introduction: There is a paucity of empirical data examining incidents and mental health nurses and the relationship between the two remains uncertain. Aim: Comparison of English national data for incidents and nursing workforce to examine recent trends. Method: Descriptive analysis of two national datasets of incidents and workforce data for England between 2015 and 2022. Results: A 46% increase in incidents was found; the leading causes are self-harm and aggressive behaviour. Despite the rise in adverse incident reporting, a 6% increase in mental health nurses was found, with more nurses in community settings than hospitals. Discussion: Current services are incident reporting at greater concentrations than in previous years. Patient-related behaviour continues to be most prominently reported, rather than possible antecedent health services issues that may contribute to reporting. Whilst staffing has increased, this does not seem to have kept pace with the implied workload evident in the increase in incident reports. Implications for Practice: Greater emphasis should be placed on health service behaviour in reporting mechanisms. Self-harm and aggression should continue to be considered adverse outcomes, but causal health service factors, such as missed care, should be present in pooled reporting to help reduce the occurrence of adverse outcomes.

Text
Psychiatric Ment Health Nurs - 2024 - Woodnutt - Analysis of England s incident and mental health nursing workforce data - Version of Record
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 12 January 2024
Published date: 23 January 2024
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Authors. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Keywords: mental health nursing, quality of care, seclusion and restraint, self-harm, staffing levels, staffing/resources, statistical methods

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 486605
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/486605
ISSN: 1351-0126
PURE UUID: b70ae4bf-ed32-41aa-a913-3674c0a8c5f6
ORCID for Samuel Woodnutt: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6821-3158
ORCID for Paula Libberton: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7512-2411
ORCID for Matt Flynn: ORCID iD orcid.org/0009-0005-7354-7490
ORCID for Francesca Purvis: ORCID iD orcid.org/0009-0006-0151-2456
ORCID for Jasmine Snowden: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5290-4587

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Jan 2024 18:00
Last modified: 04 May 2024 02:05

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Samuel Woodnutt ORCID iD
Author: Simon Hall
Author: Paula Libberton ORCID iD
Author: Matt Flynn ORCID iD
Author: Francesca Purvis ORCID iD
Author: Jasmine Snowden ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×