Farm-scale differentiation of active microbial colonizers
Farm-scale differentiation of active microbial colonizers
Microbial movement is important for replenishing lost soil microbial biodiversity and driving plant root colonization, particularly in managed agricultural soils, where microbial diversity and composition can be disrupted. Despite abundant survey-type microbiome data in soils, which are obscured by legacy DNA and microbial dormancy, we do not know how active microbial pools are shaped by local soil properties, agricultural management, and at differing spatial scales. To determine how active microbial colonizers are shaped by spatial scale and environmental conditions, we deployed microbial traps (i.e. sterile soil enclosed by small pore membranes) containing two distinct soil types (forest; agricultural), in three neighboring locations, assessing colonization through 16S rRNA gene and fungal ITS amplicon sequencing. Location had a greater impact on fungal colonizers (R2 = 0.31 vs. 0.26), while the soil type within the microbial traps influenced bacterial colonizers more (R2 = 0.09 vs. 0.02). Bacterial colonizers showed greater colonization consistency (within-group similarity) among replicate communities. Relative to bacterial colonizers, fungal colonizers shared a greater compositional overlap to sequences from the surrounding local bulk soil (R2 = 0.08 vs. 0.29), suggesting that these groups respond to distinct environmental constraints and that their in-field management may differ. Understanding how environmental constraints and spatial scales impact microbial recolonization dynamics and community assembly are essential for identifying how soil management can be used to shape agricultural microbiomes.
King, William L.
0bd4328a-34ba-4b9a-bf4e-1442c18c43fc
Kaminsky, Laura M.
cdd71929-138a-4719-875f-972240a3f79e
Richards, Sarah C.
ba7e0707-3e1c-43aa-a72e-0623abb12c18
Bradley, Brosi A.
58498666-542e-46d3-a68b-45c0133e1746
Kaye, Jason P.
9a20833c-f457-41f8-9b57-1c9c9ca8d0fe
Bell, Terrence H.
29863b8c-a89c-4077-b22d-62052cfb7225
22 March 2022
King, William L.
0bd4328a-34ba-4b9a-bf4e-1442c18c43fc
Kaminsky, Laura M.
cdd71929-138a-4719-875f-972240a3f79e
Richards, Sarah C.
ba7e0707-3e1c-43aa-a72e-0623abb12c18
Bradley, Brosi A.
58498666-542e-46d3-a68b-45c0133e1746
Kaye, Jason P.
9a20833c-f457-41f8-9b57-1c9c9ca8d0fe
Bell, Terrence H.
29863b8c-a89c-4077-b22d-62052cfb7225
King, William L., Kaminsky, Laura M., Richards, Sarah C., Bradley, Brosi A., Kaye, Jason P. and Bell, Terrence H.
(2022)
Farm-scale differentiation of active microbial colonizers.
ISME Communications, 2 (1).
(doi:10.1038/s43705-022-00120-9).
Abstract
Microbial movement is important for replenishing lost soil microbial biodiversity and driving plant root colonization, particularly in managed agricultural soils, where microbial diversity and composition can be disrupted. Despite abundant survey-type microbiome data in soils, which are obscured by legacy DNA and microbial dormancy, we do not know how active microbial pools are shaped by local soil properties, agricultural management, and at differing spatial scales. To determine how active microbial colonizers are shaped by spatial scale and environmental conditions, we deployed microbial traps (i.e. sterile soil enclosed by small pore membranes) containing two distinct soil types (forest; agricultural), in three neighboring locations, assessing colonization through 16S rRNA gene and fungal ITS amplicon sequencing. Location had a greater impact on fungal colonizers (R2 = 0.31 vs. 0.26), while the soil type within the microbial traps influenced bacterial colonizers more (R2 = 0.09 vs. 0.02). Bacterial colonizers showed greater colonization consistency (within-group similarity) among replicate communities. Relative to bacterial colonizers, fungal colonizers shared a greater compositional overlap to sequences from the surrounding local bulk soil (R2 = 0.08 vs. 0.29), suggesting that these groups respond to distinct environmental constraints and that their in-field management may differ. Understanding how environmental constraints and spatial scales impact microbial recolonization dynamics and community assembly are essential for identifying how soil management can be used to shape agricultural microbiomes.
Text
43705_2022_article_120
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 22 March 2022
Published date: 22 March 2022
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 486617
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/486617
ISSN: 2730-6151
PURE UUID: 8a4c081e-8b88-45ec-954a-efd6d3f4c0c5
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 26 Jan 2024 18:02
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:18
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
William L. King
Author:
Laura M. Kaminsky
Author:
Sarah C. Richards
Author:
Brosi A. Bradley
Author:
Jason P. Kaye
Author:
Terrence H. Bell
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics