The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Farm-scale differentiation of active microbial colonizers

Farm-scale differentiation of active microbial colonizers
Farm-scale differentiation of active microbial colonizers
Microbial movement is important for replenishing lost soil microbial biodiversity and driving plant root colonization, particularly in managed agricultural soils, where microbial diversity and composition can be disrupted. Despite abundant survey-type microbiome data in soils, which are obscured by legacy DNA and microbial dormancy, we do not know how active microbial pools are shaped by local soil properties, agricultural management, and at differing spatial scales. To determine how active microbial colonizers are shaped by spatial scale and environmental conditions, we deployed microbial traps (i.e. sterile soil enclosed by small pore membranes) containing two distinct soil types (forest; agricultural), in three neighboring locations, assessing colonization through 16S rRNA gene and fungal ITS amplicon sequencing. Location had a greater impact on fungal colonizers (R2 = 0.31 vs. 0.26), while the soil type within the microbial traps influenced bacterial colonizers more (R2 = 0.09 vs. 0.02). Bacterial colonizers showed greater colonization consistency (within-group similarity) among replicate communities. Relative to bacterial colonizers, fungal colonizers shared a greater compositional overlap to sequences from the surrounding local bulk soil (R2 = 0.08 vs. 0.29), suggesting that these groups respond to distinct environmental constraints and that their in-field management may differ. Understanding how environmental constraints and spatial scales impact microbial recolonization dynamics and community assembly are essential for identifying how soil management can be used to shape agricultural microbiomes.
2730-6151
King, William L.
0bd4328a-34ba-4b9a-bf4e-1442c18c43fc
Kaminsky, Laura M.
cdd71929-138a-4719-875f-972240a3f79e
Richards, Sarah C.
ba7e0707-3e1c-43aa-a72e-0623abb12c18
Bradley, Brosi A.
58498666-542e-46d3-a68b-45c0133e1746
Kaye, Jason P.
9a20833c-f457-41f8-9b57-1c9c9ca8d0fe
Bell, Terrence H.
29863b8c-a89c-4077-b22d-62052cfb7225
King, William L.
0bd4328a-34ba-4b9a-bf4e-1442c18c43fc
Kaminsky, Laura M.
cdd71929-138a-4719-875f-972240a3f79e
Richards, Sarah C.
ba7e0707-3e1c-43aa-a72e-0623abb12c18
Bradley, Brosi A.
58498666-542e-46d3-a68b-45c0133e1746
Kaye, Jason P.
9a20833c-f457-41f8-9b57-1c9c9ca8d0fe
Bell, Terrence H.
29863b8c-a89c-4077-b22d-62052cfb7225

King, William L., Kaminsky, Laura M., Richards, Sarah C., Bradley, Brosi A., Kaye, Jason P. and Bell, Terrence H. (2022) Farm-scale differentiation of active microbial colonizers. ISME Communications, 2 (1). (doi:10.1038/s43705-022-00120-9).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Microbial movement is important for replenishing lost soil microbial biodiversity and driving plant root colonization, particularly in managed agricultural soils, where microbial diversity and composition can be disrupted. Despite abundant survey-type microbiome data in soils, which are obscured by legacy DNA and microbial dormancy, we do not know how active microbial pools are shaped by local soil properties, agricultural management, and at differing spatial scales. To determine how active microbial colonizers are shaped by spatial scale and environmental conditions, we deployed microbial traps (i.e. sterile soil enclosed by small pore membranes) containing two distinct soil types (forest; agricultural), in three neighboring locations, assessing colonization through 16S rRNA gene and fungal ITS amplicon sequencing. Location had a greater impact on fungal colonizers (R2 = 0.31 vs. 0.26), while the soil type within the microbial traps influenced bacterial colonizers more (R2 = 0.09 vs. 0.02). Bacterial colonizers showed greater colonization consistency (within-group similarity) among replicate communities. Relative to bacterial colonizers, fungal colonizers shared a greater compositional overlap to sequences from the surrounding local bulk soil (R2 = 0.08 vs. 0.29), suggesting that these groups respond to distinct environmental constraints and that their in-field management may differ. Understanding how environmental constraints and spatial scales impact microbial recolonization dynamics and community assembly are essential for identifying how soil management can be used to shape agricultural microbiomes.

Text
43705_2022_article_120 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 22 March 2022
Published date: 22 March 2022

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 486617
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/486617
ISSN: 2730-6151
PURE UUID: 8a4c081e-8b88-45ec-954a-efd6d3f4c0c5
ORCID for William L. King: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7272-8242

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Jan 2024 18:02
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:18

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: William L. King ORCID iD
Author: Laura M. Kaminsky
Author: Sarah C. Richards
Author: Brosi A. Bradley
Author: Jason P. Kaye
Author: Terrence H. Bell

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×