Global or North American? A geographical based comparative analysis of publications in top management journals
Global or North American? A geographical based comparative analysis of publications in top management journals
This article examines the possible impact of the geographical origin of scholars on the propensity of their papers to be published. In particular, the publication acceptance rate of non-North American (NA) scholars for top management journals is compared with that of NA scholars. The article is based on an analysis of the geographical location of 1948 authors of 1091 articles published by seven top management journals, located within NA (Academy of Management Review, Academy of Management journal, Administrative Science Quarterly, Group and Organization Management) and outside NA (Organizational Studies, Human Relations, Journal of Organizational Behavior). The results indicate that strong under-representation, perhaps a bias, does exist. The discussion examines factors that might impact this phenomenon and offers some ideas and guidelines to balance this.
109-126
Baruch, Yehuda
25b89777-def4-4958-afdc-0ceab43efe8a
1 April 2001
Baruch, Yehuda
25b89777-def4-4958-afdc-0ceab43efe8a
Baruch, Yehuda
(2001)
Global or North American? A geographical based comparative analysis of publications in top management journals.
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 1 (1), .
(doi:10.1177/147059580111010).
Abstract
This article examines the possible impact of the geographical origin of scholars on the propensity of their papers to be published. In particular, the publication acceptance rate of non-North American (NA) scholars for top management journals is compared with that of NA scholars. The article is based on an analysis of the geographical location of 1948 authors of 1091 articles published by seven top management journals, located within NA (Academy of Management Review, Academy of Management journal, Administrative Science Quarterly, Group and Organization Management) and outside NA (Organizational Studies, Human Relations, Journal of Organizational Behavior). The results indicate that strong under-representation, perhaps a bias, does exist. The discussion examines factors that might impact this phenomenon and offers some ideas and guidelines to balance this.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1 April 2001
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 486630
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/486630
ISSN: 1470-5958
PURE UUID: d086394d-83c8-4036-bf93-d319680bc818
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 29 Jan 2024 17:31
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:25
Export record
Altmetrics
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics
