The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The politics of sympathy in the popular fiction of Mary Ward and Marie Corelli 1886 – 1908

The politics of sympathy in the popular fiction of Mary Ward and Marie Corelli 1886 – 1908
The politics of sympathy in the popular fiction of Mary Ward and Marie Corelli 1886 – 1908
This thesis demonstrates that the hitherto under-recognised resurgence of sympathy in late-nineteenth-century fiction was key to the social and literary politics of Mary Ward’s and Marie Corelli’s fin-de-siècle popular fiction and to their work’s impact on readers. It argues that their popular fiction thereby provided a new democratic forum for public debate on issues of class, social reform, public morality, and cultural inclusion. The diversity of interpretations and associations of sympathy in the nineteenth century underpinned both Ward’s ethics of fellow feeling and Corelli’s concept of a bond of sympathy with readers. For both, the stimulation of sympathetic reading experiences was key. Readers were encouraged to think and feel along with fictional characters torn by ideological conflict in Ward’s dialogical fiction of ideas, while Corelli’s readers were offered validation of their political and cultural status while being enticed with an alternative fictional world of spiritual and moral uplift that was derided by critics. Extensive and original archival research in the British Newspaper Archive and elsewhere reveals how their work was received. It shows how readers, unlike many critics, took their work seriously, even when, as with Corelli’s morally controversial novels, the fiction could be seen as self-contradictory. Whether intentionally (Ward) or unintentionally (Corelli), readers were drawn into dialogue and debate with their fiction. While Ward’s novels engaged particularly the movers and shakers of the time, Corelli’s fiction was subject to widespread public debate between supporters and opponents, as recorded in the pages of local newspapers. Through this investigation a contribution is made to recent critical debates about the nature and effect of sympathy engendered through the act of reading and about the role of popular fiction in the public sphere.
sympathy, readers, popular fiction, nineteenth century, Mary Ward, Marie Corelli, Humphry Ward
University of Southampton
Edwards, Stephen
4a5e08b9-a654-4b1f-aa9e-4509f1aa3754
Edwards, Stephen
4a5e08b9-a654-4b1f-aa9e-4509f1aa3754
Hammond, Mary
36bc55ac-8543-411f-ba89-668e19905e35
Kerr, Matt
44773046-20f6-4fdd-93d6-006de83c046e
Bygrave, Stephen
c0c3f93a-dab5-4674-aa79-072f4dc11233

Edwards, Stephen (2024) The politics of sympathy in the popular fiction of Mary Ward and Marie Corelli 1886 – 1908. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 257pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

This thesis demonstrates that the hitherto under-recognised resurgence of sympathy in late-nineteenth-century fiction was key to the social and literary politics of Mary Ward’s and Marie Corelli’s fin-de-siècle popular fiction and to their work’s impact on readers. It argues that their popular fiction thereby provided a new democratic forum for public debate on issues of class, social reform, public morality, and cultural inclusion. The diversity of interpretations and associations of sympathy in the nineteenth century underpinned both Ward’s ethics of fellow feeling and Corelli’s concept of a bond of sympathy with readers. For both, the stimulation of sympathetic reading experiences was key. Readers were encouraged to think and feel along with fictional characters torn by ideological conflict in Ward’s dialogical fiction of ideas, while Corelli’s readers were offered validation of their political and cultural status while being enticed with an alternative fictional world of spiritual and moral uplift that was derided by critics. Extensive and original archival research in the British Newspaper Archive and elsewhere reveals how their work was received. It shows how readers, unlike many critics, took their work seriously, even when, as with Corelli’s morally controversial novels, the fiction could be seen as self-contradictory. Whether intentionally (Ward) or unintentionally (Corelli), readers were drawn into dialogue and debate with their fiction. While Ward’s novels engaged particularly the movers and shakers of the time, Corelli’s fiction was subject to widespread public debate between supporters and opponents, as recorded in the pages of local newspapers. Through this investigation a contribution is made to recent critical debates about the nature and effect of sympathy engendered through the act of reading and about the role of popular fiction in the public sphere.

Text
Stephen Edwards Doctoral Thesis PDFA - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (2MB)
Text
Final-thesis-submission-Examination-Mr-Stephen-Edwards
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.

More information

Submitted date: December 2023
Published date: January 2024
Keywords: sympathy, readers, popular fiction, nineteenth century, Mary Ward, Marie Corelli, Humphry Ward

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 486635
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/486635
PURE UUID: 35e2c1e3-c207-4134-b054-89c117b90e92
ORCID for Stephen Edwards: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2755-345X
ORCID for Stephen Bygrave: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7015-8474

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 30 Jan 2024 17:39
Last modified: 17 Apr 2024 01:47

Export record

Contributors

Author: Stephen Edwards ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Mary Hammond
Thesis advisor: Matt Kerr
Thesis advisor: Stephen Bygrave ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×