The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Muscle parameters in fragility fracture risk prediction in older adults: a scoping review.

Muscle parameters in fragility fracture risk prediction in older adults: a scoping review.
Muscle parameters in fragility fracture risk prediction in older adults: a scoping review.
Half of osteoporotic fractures occur in patients with normal/osteopenic bone density or at intermediate or low estimated risk. Muscle measures have been shown to contribute to fracture risk independently of bone mineral density. The objectives were to review the measurements of muscle health (muscle mass/quantity/quality, strength and function) and their association with incident fragility fractures and to summarize their use in clinical practice. This scoping review follows the PRISMA-ScR guidelines for reporting. Our search strategy covered the three overreaching concepts of ‘fragility fractures’, ‘muscle health assessment’ and ‘risk’. We retrieved 14 745 references from Medline Ovid SP, EMBASE, Web of Science Core Collection and Google Scholar. We included original and prospective studies on community-dwelling adults aged over 50 years that analysed an association between at least one muscle parameter and incident fragility fractures. We systematically extracted 17 items from each study, including methodology, general characteristics and results. Data were summarized in tables and graphically presented in adjusted forest plots. Sixty-seven articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In total, we studied 60 muscle parameters or indexes and 322 fracture risk ratios over 2.8 million person-years (MPY). The median (interquartile range) sample size was 1642 (921–5756), age 69.2 (63.5–73.6) years, follow-up 10.0 (4.4–12.0) years and number of incident fragility fractures 166 (88–277). A lower muscle mass was positively/not/negatively associated with incident fragility fracture in 28 (2.0), 64 (2.5) and 10 (0.2 MPY) analyses. A lower muscle strength was positively/not/negatively associated with fractures in 53 (1.3), 57 (1.7 MPY) and 0 analyses. A lower muscle function was positively/not/negatively associated in 63 (1.9), 45 (1.0 MPY) and 0 analyses. An in-depth analysis shows how each single muscle parameter was associated with each fragility fractures subtype. This review summarizes markers of muscle health and their association with fragility fractures. Measures of muscle strength and function appeared to perform better for fracture risk prediction. Of these, hand grip strength and gait speed are likely to be the most practical measures for inclusion in clinical practice, as in the evaluation of sarcopenia or in further fracture risk assessment scores. Measures of muscle mass did not appear to predict fragility fractures and might benefit from further research, on D3-creatine dilution test, lean mass indexes and artificial intelligence methods.
2190-5991
Vendrami, Colin
4692fbc4-9cff-42af-9dc6-98aed9dc5de2
Shevroja, Enisa
fd988f38-cb84-4ec1-a085-0cdd3300016c
Gonzalez Rodriguez, Elena
ac4385b4-6e99-497e-8054-921e07be084f
Gatineau, Guillaume
0344f2f6-47d6-4fb1-a77f-e843dbc346bc
Elmers, Jolanda
ce871099-e294-4f2e-85ad-1a9b40300bc3
Reginster, Jean-Yves
3b202e1d-9778-4d8f-b840-b6af7bdaf3db
Harvey, Nicholas C.
ce487fb4-d360-4aac-9d17-9466d6cba145
Lamy, Oliver
0b1a1c0b-e51b-45a8-a60b-e0eab0ffe615
Hans, Didier
1a5d8024-c245-4e99-afc6-b9b82d04cb22
Vendrami, Colin
4692fbc4-9cff-42af-9dc6-98aed9dc5de2
Shevroja, Enisa
fd988f38-cb84-4ec1-a085-0cdd3300016c
Gonzalez Rodriguez, Elena
ac4385b4-6e99-497e-8054-921e07be084f
Gatineau, Guillaume
0344f2f6-47d6-4fb1-a77f-e843dbc346bc
Elmers, Jolanda
ce871099-e294-4f2e-85ad-1a9b40300bc3
Reginster, Jean-Yves
3b202e1d-9778-4d8f-b840-b6af7bdaf3db
Harvey, Nicholas C.
ce487fb4-d360-4aac-9d17-9466d6cba145
Lamy, Oliver
0b1a1c0b-e51b-45a8-a60b-e0eab0ffe615
Hans, Didier
1a5d8024-c245-4e99-afc6-b9b82d04cb22

Vendrami, Colin, Shevroja, Enisa, Gonzalez Rodriguez, Elena, Gatineau, Guillaume, Elmers, Jolanda, Reginster, Jean-Yves, Harvey, Nicholas C., Lamy, Oliver and Hans, Didier (2023) Muscle parameters in fragility fracture risk prediction in older adults: a scoping review. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle. (doi:10.1002/jcsm.13418). (In Press)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Half of osteoporotic fractures occur in patients with normal/osteopenic bone density or at intermediate or low estimated risk. Muscle measures have been shown to contribute to fracture risk independently of bone mineral density. The objectives were to review the measurements of muscle health (muscle mass/quantity/quality, strength and function) and their association with incident fragility fractures and to summarize their use in clinical practice. This scoping review follows the PRISMA-ScR guidelines for reporting. Our search strategy covered the three overreaching concepts of ‘fragility fractures’, ‘muscle health assessment’ and ‘risk’. We retrieved 14 745 references from Medline Ovid SP, EMBASE, Web of Science Core Collection and Google Scholar. We included original and prospective studies on community-dwelling adults aged over 50 years that analysed an association between at least one muscle parameter and incident fragility fractures. We systematically extracted 17 items from each study, including methodology, general characteristics and results. Data were summarized in tables and graphically presented in adjusted forest plots. Sixty-seven articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In total, we studied 60 muscle parameters or indexes and 322 fracture risk ratios over 2.8 million person-years (MPY). The median (interquartile range) sample size was 1642 (921–5756), age 69.2 (63.5–73.6) years, follow-up 10.0 (4.4–12.0) years and number of incident fragility fractures 166 (88–277). A lower muscle mass was positively/not/negatively associated with incident fragility fracture in 28 (2.0), 64 (2.5) and 10 (0.2 MPY) analyses. A lower muscle strength was positively/not/negatively associated with fractures in 53 (1.3), 57 (1.7 MPY) and 0 analyses. A lower muscle function was positively/not/negatively associated in 63 (1.9), 45 (1.0 MPY) and 0 analyses. An in-depth analysis shows how each single muscle parameter was associated with each fragility fractures subtype. This review summarizes markers of muscle health and their association with fragility fractures. Measures of muscle strength and function appeared to perform better for fracture risk prediction. Of these, hand grip strength and gait speed are likely to be the most practical measures for inclusion in clinical practice, as in the evaluation of sarcopenia or in further fracture risk assessment scores. Measures of muscle mass did not appear to predict fragility fractures and might benefit from further research, on D3-creatine dilution test, lean mass indexes and artificial intelligence methods.

Text
J cachexia sarcopenia muscle - 2024 - Vendrami - Muscle parameters in fragility fracture risk prediction in older adults A - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (3MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 28 November 2023

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 486656
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/486656
ISSN: 2190-5991
PURE UUID: 227ea22d-7b1a-43d6-828f-d5ba5b00948c
ORCID for Nicholas C. Harvey: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8194-2512

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 31 Jan 2024 17:30
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 02:59

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Colin Vendrami
Author: Enisa Shevroja
Author: Elena Gonzalez Rodriguez
Author: Guillaume Gatineau
Author: Jolanda Elmers
Author: Jean-Yves Reginster
Author: Oliver Lamy
Author: Didier Hans

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×