The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Digital clinical communication for families and caregivers of children or young people with short- or long-term conditions: rapid review

Digital clinical communication for families and caregivers of children or young people with short- or long-term conditions: rapid review
Digital clinical communication for families and caregivers of children or young people with short- or long-term conditions: rapid review
Background : the communication relationship between parents of children or young people with health conditions and health professionals is an important part of treatment, but it is unclear how far the use of digital clinical communication tools may affect this relationship.

Objective: the objective of our study was to describe, assess the feasibility of, and explore the impact of digital clinical communication between families or caregivers and health professionals.

Methods: we searched the literature using 5 electronic databases. We considered all types of study design published in the English language from January 2009 to August 2015. The population of interest included families and caregivers of children and young people aged less than 26 years with any type of health condition. The intervention was any technology permitting 2-way communication.

Results: we included 31 articles. The main designs were randomized controlled trials (RCTs; n=10), cross-sectional studies (n=9), pre- and postintervention uncontrolled (pre/post) studies (n=7), and qualitative interview studies (n=2); 6 had mixed-methods designs. In the majority of cases, we considered the quality rating to be fair. Many different types of health condition were represented. A breadth of digital communication tools were included: videoconferencing or videoconsultation (n=14), and Web messaging or emails (n=12). Health care professionals were mainly therapists or cognitive behavioral therapists (n=10), physicians (n=8), and nurses (n=6). Studies were very heterogeneous in terms of outcomes. Interventions were mainly evaluated using satisfaction or acceptance, or outcomes relating to feasibility. Clinical outcomes were rarely used. The RCTs showed that digital clinical communication had no impact in comparison with standard care. Uncontrolled pre/post studies showed good rates of satisfaction or acceptance. Some economic studies suggested that digital clinical communication may save costs.

Conclusions: this rapid review showed an emerging body of literature on the use of digital clinical communication to improve families? and caregivers? involvement in the health management of children or young people. Further research with appropriate study designs and longer-term outcome measures should be encouraged.

Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42016035467; http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD 42016 035467(Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6vpgZU1FU)
1438-8871
Armoiry, Xavier
49014fa2-8385-4c2d-9790-060a0af028be
Sturt, Jackie
f729ee1d-6b17-4a7e-a959-fe0d5465795a
Phelps, Emma Elizabeth
8d903586-1891-4590-9fc1-d43f12d30c3f
Walker, Clare-Louise
83e3dfd9-d2c3-44e6-8d20-70bbd0e7a772
Court, Rachel
f276694e-24ce-4a4c-a28d-d044f718dce8
Taggart, Frances
3a54c59b-5e4a-41de-be94-3c86e8de1708
Sutcliffe, Paul
9ee6f375-275f-4e5e-85f4-e28d0de6b28d
Griffiths, Frances
1bb8e612-abbb-4b98-8dc8-83558033d886
Atherton, Helen
9bb8932e-7bb7-4781-ab97-114613de99b1
Armoiry, Xavier
49014fa2-8385-4c2d-9790-060a0af028be
Sturt, Jackie
f729ee1d-6b17-4a7e-a959-fe0d5465795a
Phelps, Emma Elizabeth
8d903586-1891-4590-9fc1-d43f12d30c3f
Walker, Clare-Louise
83e3dfd9-d2c3-44e6-8d20-70bbd0e7a772
Court, Rachel
f276694e-24ce-4a4c-a28d-d044f718dce8
Taggart, Frances
3a54c59b-5e4a-41de-be94-3c86e8de1708
Sutcliffe, Paul
9ee6f375-275f-4e5e-85f4-e28d0de6b28d
Griffiths, Frances
1bb8e612-abbb-4b98-8dc8-83558033d886
Atherton, Helen
9bb8932e-7bb7-4781-ab97-114613de99b1

Armoiry, Xavier, Sturt, Jackie, Phelps, Emma Elizabeth, Walker, Clare-Louise, Court, Rachel, Taggart, Frances, Sutcliffe, Paul, Griffiths, Frances and Atherton, Helen (2018) Digital clinical communication for families and caregivers of children or young people with short- or long-term conditions: rapid review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20 (1), [e5]. (doi:10.2196/jmir.7999).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background : the communication relationship between parents of children or young people with health conditions and health professionals is an important part of treatment, but it is unclear how far the use of digital clinical communication tools may affect this relationship.

Objective: the objective of our study was to describe, assess the feasibility of, and explore the impact of digital clinical communication between families or caregivers and health professionals.

Methods: we searched the literature using 5 electronic databases. We considered all types of study design published in the English language from January 2009 to August 2015. The population of interest included families and caregivers of children and young people aged less than 26 years with any type of health condition. The intervention was any technology permitting 2-way communication.

Results: we included 31 articles. The main designs were randomized controlled trials (RCTs; n=10), cross-sectional studies (n=9), pre- and postintervention uncontrolled (pre/post) studies (n=7), and qualitative interview studies (n=2); 6 had mixed-methods designs. In the majority of cases, we considered the quality rating to be fair. Many different types of health condition were represented. A breadth of digital communication tools were included: videoconferencing or videoconsultation (n=14), and Web messaging or emails (n=12). Health care professionals were mainly therapists or cognitive behavioral therapists (n=10), physicians (n=8), and nurses (n=6). Studies were very heterogeneous in terms of outcomes. Interventions were mainly evaluated using satisfaction or acceptance, or outcomes relating to feasibility. Clinical outcomes were rarely used. The RCTs showed that digital clinical communication had no impact in comparison with standard care. Uncontrolled pre/post studies showed good rates of satisfaction or acceptance. Some economic studies suggested that digital clinical communication may save costs.

Conclusions: this rapid review showed an emerging body of literature on the use of digital clinical communication to improve families? and caregivers? involvement in the health management of children or young people. Further research with appropriate study designs and longer-term outcome measures should be encouraged.

Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42016035467; http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD 42016 035467(Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6vpgZU1FU)

Text
PDF (5) - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (228kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 4 November 2017
Published date: 5 January 2018

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 486663
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/486663
ISSN: 1438-8871
PURE UUID: 4389a1ff-ff12-439a-89de-4ef41e650b7c
ORCID for Helen Atherton: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7072-1925

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 31 Jan 2024 17:32
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:18

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Xavier Armoiry
Author: Jackie Sturt
Author: Emma Elizabeth Phelps
Author: Clare-Louise Walker
Author: Rachel Court
Author: Frances Taggart
Author: Paul Sutcliffe
Author: Frances Griffiths
Author: Helen Atherton ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×