Spatial and taxonomic biases in bat records: drivers and conservation implications in a megadiverse country
Spatial and taxonomic biases in bat records: drivers and conservation implications in a megadiverse country
Biases in data availability have serious consequences on scientific inferences that can be derived. The potential consequences of these biases could be more detrimental in the less-studied megadiverse regions, often characterized by high biodiversity and serious risks of human threats, as conservation and management actions could be misdirected. Here, focusing on 134 bat species in Mexico, we analyze spatial and taxonomic biases and their drivers in occurrence data; and identify priority areas for further data collection which are currently under-sampled or at future environmental risk. We collated a comprehensive database of 26,192 presence-only bat records in Mexico to characterize taxonomic and spatial biases and relate them to species' characteristics (range size and foraging behavior). Next, we examined variables related to accessibility, species richness and security to explain the spatial patterns in occurrence records. Finally, we compared the spatial distributions of existing data and future threats to these species to highlight those regions that are likely to experience an increased level of threats but are currently under-surveyed. We found taxonomic biases, where species with wider geographical ranges and narrow-space foragers (species easily captured with traditional methods), had more occurrence data. There was a significant oversampling toward tropical regions, and the presence and number of records was positively associated with areas of high topographic heterogeneity, road density, urban, and protected areas, and negatively associated with areas which were predicted to have future increases in temperature and precipitation. Sampling efforts for Mexican bats appear to have focused disproportionately on easily captured species, tropical regions, areas of high species richness and security; leading to under-sampling in areas of high future threats. These biases could substantially influence the assessment of current status of, and future anthropogenic impacts on, this diverse species group in a tropical megadiverse country.
anthropogenic threats, chiroptera, data gaps, Mexico, risk hotspots
14130-14141
Zamora-Gutierrez, Veronica
17a6b9d9-3346-4df6-9438-026b7342e28a
Amano, Tatsuya
e7c187c3-c64d-4798-886e-14527301e162
Jones, Kate E.
f1cf7f49-c3cb-4900-9ae8-411b5d7605a2
1 December 2019
Zamora-Gutierrez, Veronica
17a6b9d9-3346-4df6-9438-026b7342e28a
Amano, Tatsuya
e7c187c3-c64d-4798-886e-14527301e162
Jones, Kate E.
f1cf7f49-c3cb-4900-9ae8-411b5d7605a2
Zamora-Gutierrez, Veronica, Amano, Tatsuya and Jones, Kate E.
(2019)
Spatial and taxonomic biases in bat records: drivers and conservation implications in a megadiverse country.
Ecology and Evolution, 9 (24), .
(doi:10.1002/ece3.5848).
Abstract
Biases in data availability have serious consequences on scientific inferences that can be derived. The potential consequences of these biases could be more detrimental in the less-studied megadiverse regions, often characterized by high biodiversity and serious risks of human threats, as conservation and management actions could be misdirected. Here, focusing on 134 bat species in Mexico, we analyze spatial and taxonomic biases and their drivers in occurrence data; and identify priority areas for further data collection which are currently under-sampled or at future environmental risk. We collated a comprehensive database of 26,192 presence-only bat records in Mexico to characterize taxonomic and spatial biases and relate them to species' characteristics (range size and foraging behavior). Next, we examined variables related to accessibility, species richness and security to explain the spatial patterns in occurrence records. Finally, we compared the spatial distributions of existing data and future threats to these species to highlight those regions that are likely to experience an increased level of threats but are currently under-surveyed. We found taxonomic biases, where species with wider geographical ranges and narrow-space foragers (species easily captured with traditional methods), had more occurrence data. There was a significant oversampling toward tropical regions, and the presence and number of records was positively associated with areas of high topographic heterogeneity, road density, urban, and protected areas, and negatively associated with areas which were predicted to have future increases in temperature and precipitation. Sampling efforts for Mexican bats appear to have focused disproportionately on easily captured species, tropical regions, areas of high species richness and security; leading to under-sampling in areas of high future threats. These biases could substantially influence the assessment of current status of, and future anthropogenic impacts on, this diverse species group in a tropical megadiverse country.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1 December 2019
Additional Information:
Funding Information:
This study was financially supported by American Society of Mammalogists, Bat Conservation International, Cambridge Commonwealth European and International Trust (No. 301879989), CONACYT (No. 310731), Hitchcock funds Cambridge, Idea Wild, Rufford Small Grants (No. 12059‐1) and Whitmore Trust Cambridge to V.Z.G, the European Commission's Marie Curie International Incoming Fellowship Program (PIIF‐GA‐2011‐303221), Isaac Newton Trust, Grantham Foundation for the Protection of the Environment and the Kenneth Miller Trust to T.A. and Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Grant EP/K015664/1 to K.E.J. We thank all the people who shared their data and to two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on earlier versions of the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Keywords:
anthropogenic threats, chiroptera, data gaps, Mexico, risk hotspots
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 486698
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/486698
ISSN: 2045-7758
PURE UUID: 7136ed5c-5bd6-457d-85e4-7fbbc34edb41
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 01 Feb 2024 17:51
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:18
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Veronica Zamora-Gutierrez
Author:
Tatsuya Amano
Author:
Kate E. Jones
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics