Communalities and distinctions in the measurement of organizational performance and effectiveness across for-profit and nonprofit sectors
Communalities and distinctions in the measurement of organizational performance and effectiveness across for-profit and nonprofit sectors
The article analyzes the way academic scholarly works measure organizational outcomes, commonly reported as either organizational effectiveness or organizational performance (OEP). From the analysis of 149 scholarly publications published in the past decade, focusing on business organizations (100), on nonprofit organizations (21), and a mix of both (28), a set of criteria emerged. Overlapping common ground issues found for all the sectors include (a) efficiency and/or productivity, (b) growth and/ormarket share, (c) customer orientation, and (d) quality. Further measures (e.g., public image and/or reputation, social performance) fit specific sectors. A multivariate analysis showed three and two configurations of criteria for business and not-for-profit research, respectively. Results suggest a set of accepted, multidimensional, and universal criteria for measuring OEP. In choosing criteria for future studies, we recommend adopting such common ground, backed up by specific criteria when a certain sector is unique, to reflect convergence and divergence in OEP research.
39-65
Baruch, Yehuda
25b89777-def4-4958-afdc-0ceab43efe8a
Ramalho, Nelson
79a1193d-3d45-4ad4-bc03-1aa85d2aa433
1 March 2006
Baruch, Yehuda
25b89777-def4-4958-afdc-0ceab43efe8a
Ramalho, Nelson
79a1193d-3d45-4ad4-bc03-1aa85d2aa433
Baruch, Yehuda and Ramalho, Nelson
(2006)
Communalities and distinctions in the measurement of organizational performance and effectiveness across for-profit and nonprofit sectors.
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35 (1), .
(doi:10.1177/0899764005282468).
Abstract
The article analyzes the way academic scholarly works measure organizational outcomes, commonly reported as either organizational effectiveness or organizational performance (OEP). From the analysis of 149 scholarly publications published in the past decade, focusing on business organizations (100), on nonprofit organizations (21), and a mix of both (28), a set of criteria emerged. Overlapping common ground issues found for all the sectors include (a) efficiency and/or productivity, (b) growth and/ormarket share, (c) customer orientation, and (d) quality. Further measures (e.g., public image and/or reputation, social performance) fit specific sectors. A multivariate analysis showed three and two configurations of criteria for business and not-for-profit research, respectively. Results suggest a set of accepted, multidimensional, and universal criteria for measuring OEP. In choosing criteria for future studies, we recommend adopting such common ground, backed up by specific criteria when a certain sector is unique, to reflect convergence and divergence in OEP research.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1 March 2006
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 486725
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/486725
ISSN: 0899-7640
PURE UUID: 1bd5e8eb-12e0-420b-95d2-42c093744c4d
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Feb 2024 17:35
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:25
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Nelson Ramalho
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics