The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Broadening STEAM education through cross-curricular collaboration: the case of argumentation in science and religious education

Broadening STEAM education through cross-curricular collaboration: the case of argumentation in science and religious education
Broadening STEAM education through cross-curricular collaboration: the case of argumentation in science and religious education
Although there has been increasing research and development efforts in the integration of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) as well as the integration of STEM with the arts (i.e. STEAM), little attention has been placed on how other school subjects such as religious education (RE) can be integrated. In some countries like England, RE is a subject taught in secondary schools. It is a subject that aims to provide students with an overview of world religions and worldviews from a range of perspectives including philosophy and ethics. While RE and STEAM may seem mutually exclusive, there are common features addressed in both. For example, the articulation of arguments—or justification of claims with reasons and evidence—is widespread not only in science but also in RE. As such, it involves deep exploration of justification of why particular people hold the beliefs that they do. Furthermore, both RE and STEAM are, by definition, interdisciplinary and lend themselves to synthesis of new perspectives. Argumentation defined as the justification of knowledge claims with evidence and reasons, has emerged as a significant educational goal, advocated in international curricula and investigated through school-based research. Surprisingly, however, the contrast of argumentation in science and RE has been under-investigated although educators have been concerned with the manifestation of science-religion debates in schools, particularly in relation to topics such as evolution and intelligent design for numerous years. Considering the importance of worldviews in education, it is worthwhile to explore how RE might be related to STEAM education. The purpose of this chapter is to investigate how the scope of STEAM education can be broadened by focusing on school subjects conventionally not considered in relation to STEAM, such as RE. Considering RE itself is a vast domain, we focus on argumentation as an overarching theme where cross-subject integration and collaboration can be explored. Examples from the funded 3-year OARS Project from England are used to illustrate how cross-curricular collaboration between teachers can be enhanced.
2520-8616
241-264
Springer
Erduran, Sibel
ff2d1099-2722-494a-b921-9994dca75c6f
Guilfoyle, Liam
3dd9f81d-3c3b-4ae3-83c9-9abe5274df8a
Park, Wonyong
eae3796e-fc99-43ba-98be-53ea5bdb14fc
Li, Yeping
Zeng, Zheng
Song, Naiqing
Erduran, Sibel
ff2d1099-2722-494a-b921-9994dca75c6f
Guilfoyle, Liam
3dd9f81d-3c3b-4ae3-83c9-9abe5274df8a
Park, Wonyong
eae3796e-fc99-43ba-98be-53ea5bdb14fc
Li, Yeping
Zeng, Zheng
Song, Naiqing

Erduran, Sibel, Guilfoyle, Liam and Park, Wonyong (2024) Broadening STEAM education through cross-curricular collaboration: the case of argumentation in science and religious education. In, Li, Yeping, Zeng, Zheng and Song, Naiqing (eds.) Disciplinary and interdisciplinary education in STEM: changes and innovations. (Advances in STEM education) Springer, pp. 241-264. (doi:10.1007/978-3-031-52924-5_12).

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

Although there has been increasing research and development efforts in the integration of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) as well as the integration of STEM with the arts (i.e. STEAM), little attention has been placed on how other school subjects such as religious education (RE) can be integrated. In some countries like England, RE is a subject taught in secondary schools. It is a subject that aims to provide students with an overview of world religions and worldviews from a range of perspectives including philosophy and ethics. While RE and STEAM may seem mutually exclusive, there are common features addressed in both. For example, the articulation of arguments—or justification of claims with reasons and evidence—is widespread not only in science but also in RE. As such, it involves deep exploration of justification of why particular people hold the beliefs that they do. Furthermore, both RE and STEAM are, by definition, interdisciplinary and lend themselves to synthesis of new perspectives. Argumentation defined as the justification of knowledge claims with evidence and reasons, has emerged as a significant educational goal, advocated in international curricula and investigated through school-based research. Surprisingly, however, the contrast of argumentation in science and RE has been under-investigated although educators have been concerned with the manifestation of science-religion debates in schools, particularly in relation to topics such as evolution and intelligent design for numerous years. Considering the importance of worldviews in education, it is worthwhile to explore how RE might be related to STEAM education. The purpose of this chapter is to investigate how the scope of STEAM education can be broadened by focusing on school subjects conventionally not considered in relation to STEAM, such as RE. Considering RE itself is a vast domain, we focus on argumentation as an overarching theme where cross-subject integration and collaboration can be explored. Examples from the funded 3-year OARS Project from England are used to illustrate how cross-curricular collaboration between teachers can be enhanced.

Text
Final Erduran, Guilfoyle & Park AM - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 20 March 2026.
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 27 November 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 20 March 2024
Published date: 20 March 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 486750
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/486750
ISSN: 2520-8616
PURE UUID: 59cc5f54-aa93-4277-a223-9375599ca56e
ORCID for Wonyong Park: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8911-5968

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Feb 2024 18:24
Last modified: 03 May 2024 16:31

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sibel Erduran
Author: Liam Guilfoyle
Author: Wonyong Park ORCID iD
Editor: Yeping Li
Editor: Zheng Zeng
Editor: Naiqing Song

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×