The effect of oral probiotics on response to vaccination in older adults: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
The effect of oral probiotics on response to vaccination in older adults: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
This systematic review evaluated the impact of oral probiotics on the immune response to vaccination in older people. A literature search was performed in three electronic databases up to January 2023. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in older people (age > 60 years) investigating oral probiotics and vaccine response outcomes were included. Characteristics and outcome data of the included studies were extracted and analysed and study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomised trials. Ten RCTs involving 1560 participants, reported in 9 papers, were included. Nine studies involved the seasonal influenza vaccine and one a COVID-19 vaccine. All studies used lactobacilli, some in combination with bifidobacteria. Studies reported outcomes including anti-vaccine antibody titres or concentrations, seroconversion and seroprotection. When comparing antibody titres, seroprotection rate and seroconversion rate between probiotic and placebo groups expressed as a response ratio, the weighted mean values were 1.29, 1.16, and 2.00 respectively. Meta-analysis showed that probiotics increase seroconversion rates to all three strains of the seasonal influenza vaccine: odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 2.74 (1.31, 5.70; p = 0.007) for the H1N1 strain, 1.90 (1.04, 3.44; p = 0.04) for the H2N2 strain, 1.72 (1.05, 2.80; p = 0.03) for the B strain. There was a low level of heterogeneity in these findings. Several studies were at high risk of bias due to missing outcome data. Lactobacilli may improve the vaccine response, but further research is needed to be more certain of this.
Tunc, Hediye Arioz
2d29347d-7fed-44d1-8c64-695a96517fa5
Childs, Caroline
ea17ccc1-2eac-4f67-96c7-a0c4d9dfd9c5
Swann, Jonathan
7c11a66b-f4b8-4dbf-aa17-ad8b0561b85c
Calder, Philip
1797e54f-378e-4dcb-80a4-3e30018f07a6
Tunc, Hediye Arioz
2d29347d-7fed-44d1-8c64-695a96517fa5
Childs, Caroline
ea17ccc1-2eac-4f67-96c7-a0c4d9dfd9c5
Swann, Jonathan
7c11a66b-f4b8-4dbf-aa17-ad8b0561b85c
Calder, Philip
1797e54f-378e-4dcb-80a4-3e30018f07a6
Tunc, Hediye Arioz, Childs, Caroline, Swann, Jonathan and Calder, Philip
(2024)
The effect of oral probiotics on response to vaccination in older adults: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
Age and Ageing.
(In Press)
Abstract
This systematic review evaluated the impact of oral probiotics on the immune response to vaccination in older people. A literature search was performed in three electronic databases up to January 2023. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in older people (age > 60 years) investigating oral probiotics and vaccine response outcomes were included. Characteristics and outcome data of the included studies were extracted and analysed and study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomised trials. Ten RCTs involving 1560 participants, reported in 9 papers, were included. Nine studies involved the seasonal influenza vaccine and one a COVID-19 vaccine. All studies used lactobacilli, some in combination with bifidobacteria. Studies reported outcomes including anti-vaccine antibody titres or concentrations, seroconversion and seroprotection. When comparing antibody titres, seroprotection rate and seroconversion rate between probiotic and placebo groups expressed as a response ratio, the weighted mean values were 1.29, 1.16, and 2.00 respectively. Meta-analysis showed that probiotics increase seroconversion rates to all three strains of the seasonal influenza vaccine: odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 2.74 (1.31, 5.70; p = 0.007) for the H1N1 strain, 1.90 (1.04, 3.44; p = 0.04) for the H2N2 strain, 1.72 (1.05, 2.80; p = 0.03) for the B strain. There was a low level of heterogeneity in these findings. Several studies were at high risk of bias due to missing outcome data. Lactobacilli may improve the vaccine response, but further research is needed to be more certain of this.
Text
Arioz Tunc et al._Manuscript_Revised for submission_Clean Version
- Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 2 February 2025.
Request a copy
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 2 February 2024
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 486755
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/486755
ISSN: 0002-0729
PURE UUID: 8a4c85a4-3143-4d30-b79d-7cdc90587dec
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Feb 2024 17:30
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:56
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Hediye Arioz Tunc
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics