Geographical variation in certification rates of blindness and sight impairment in England, 2008-2009
Geographical variation in certification rates of blindness and sight impairment in England, 2008-2009
Objectives: to examine and interpret the variation in the incidence of blindness and sight impairment in England by PCT, as reported by the Certificate of Vision Impairment (CVI).
Design: analysis of national certification data.
Setting: all Primary Care Trusts, England.
Participants: 23 773 CVI certifications issued from 2008 to 2009.
Main Outcome measures: crude and Age standardised rates of CVI data for blindness and sight loss by PCT.
Methods: the crude and age standardised CVI rates per 100 000 were calculated with Spearman's rank correlation used to assess whether there was any evidence of association between CVI rates with Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) and the Programme Spend for Vision.
Results: there was high-level variation, almost 11-fold (coefficient of variation 38%) in standardised CVI blindness and sight impairment annual certification rates across PCTs. The mean rate was 43.7 and the SD 16.7. We found little evidence of an association between the rate of blindness and sight impairment with either the IMD or Programme Spend on Vision.
Conclusions: the wide geographical variation we found raises questions about the quality of the data and whether there is genuine unmet need for prevention of sight loss. It is a concern for public health practitioners who will be interpreting these data locally and nationally as the CVI data will form the basis of the public health indicator 'preventable sight loss'. Poor-quality data and inadequate interpretation will only create confusion if not addressed adequately from the outset. There is an urgent need to address the shortcomings of the current data collection system and to educate all public health practitioners.
Malik, Aeesha N.J.
91c016a2-2f41-49ee-b23c-5dee21654336
Bunce, Catey
6b999375-2e40-497f-8076-9435b3cba2f4
Wormald, Richard
3e24fe2f-b99c-4c90-9b44-59510b836887
Suleman, Mehrunisha
58494f76-04ab-4a73-9c6b-d4c1d767d6b3
Stratton, Irene
772f25b9-23c0-4240-a3f6-1e76b03b172f
Gray, J.A. Muir
29271e6d-0ba2-4fa3-8b45-5855ce4360ad
Malik, Aeesha N.J.
91c016a2-2f41-49ee-b23c-5dee21654336
Bunce, Catey
6b999375-2e40-497f-8076-9435b3cba2f4
Wormald, Richard
3e24fe2f-b99c-4c90-9b44-59510b836887
Suleman, Mehrunisha
58494f76-04ab-4a73-9c6b-d4c1d767d6b3
Stratton, Irene
772f25b9-23c0-4240-a3f6-1e76b03b172f
Gray, J.A. Muir
29271e6d-0ba2-4fa3-8b45-5855ce4360ad
Malik, Aeesha N.J., Bunce, Catey, Wormald, Richard, Suleman, Mehrunisha, Stratton, Irene and Gray, J.A. Muir
(2012)
Geographical variation in certification rates of blindness and sight impairment in England, 2008-2009.
BMJ Open, 2 (6), [e001496].
(doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001496).
Abstract
Objectives: to examine and interpret the variation in the incidence of blindness and sight impairment in England by PCT, as reported by the Certificate of Vision Impairment (CVI).
Design: analysis of national certification data.
Setting: all Primary Care Trusts, England.
Participants: 23 773 CVI certifications issued from 2008 to 2009.
Main Outcome measures: crude and Age standardised rates of CVI data for blindness and sight loss by PCT.
Methods: the crude and age standardised CVI rates per 100 000 were calculated with Spearman's rank correlation used to assess whether there was any evidence of association between CVI rates with Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) and the Programme Spend for Vision.
Results: there was high-level variation, almost 11-fold (coefficient of variation 38%) in standardised CVI blindness and sight impairment annual certification rates across PCTs. The mean rate was 43.7 and the SD 16.7. We found little evidence of an association between the rate of blindness and sight impairment with either the IMD or Programme Spend on Vision.
Conclusions: the wide geographical variation we found raises questions about the quality of the data and whether there is genuine unmet need for prevention of sight loss. It is a concern for public health practitioners who will be interpreting these data locally and nationally as the CVI data will form the basis of the public health indicator 'preventable sight loss'. Poor-quality data and inadequate interpretation will only create confusion if not addressed adequately from the outset. There is an urgent need to address the shortcomings of the current data collection system and to educate all public health practitioners.
Text
e001496.full
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 9 October 2012
e-pub ahead of print date: 19 November 2012
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 487054
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/487054
ISSN: 2044-6055
PURE UUID: 11986335-768a-40ad-b648-1383f48aee4e
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 12 Feb 2024 17:31
Last modified: 06 Jun 2024 02:10
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Aeesha N.J. Malik
Author:
Catey Bunce
Author:
Richard Wormald
Author:
Mehrunisha Suleman
Author:
Irene Stratton
Author:
J.A. Muir Gray
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics