Insights from survival analyses during 12 years of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration
Insights from survival analyses during 12 years of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration
Importance: although multiple imputation models for missing data and the use of mixed-effects models generally provide better outcome estimates than using only observed data or last observation carried forward in clinical trials, such approaches usually cannot be applied to visual outcomes from retrospective analyses of clinical practice settings, also called real-world outcomes.
Objective: to explore the potential usefulness of survival analysis techniques for retrospective clinical practice visual outcomes.
Design, setting, and participants: this retrospective cohort study covered a 12-year observation period at a tertiary eye center. Of 10 744 eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration receiving anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy between October 28, 2008, and February 1, 2020, 7802 eyes met study criteria (treatment-naive, first-treated eyes starting anti-VEGF therapy). Eyes were excluded from the analysis if they received photodynamic therapy or macular laser, any previous anti-VEGF therapy, treatment with anti-VEGF agents other than ranibizumab or aflibercept, or had an unknown date or visual acuity (VA) value at first injection.
Main outcomes and measures: Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to consider VA reaching an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter score of 70 (Snellen equivalent, 20/40) or better, duration of VA sustained at or better than 70 (20/40), and VA declining to 35 (20/200) or worse.
Results: a total of 7802 patients (mean [SD] age, 78.7 [8.8] years; 4776 women [61.2%]; and 4785 White [61.3%]) were included in the study. The median time to attaining a VA letter score greater than or equal to 70 (20/40) was 2.0 years (95% CI, 1.87-2.32) after the first anti-VEGF injection. Predictive features were baseline VA (hazard ratio [HR], 1.43 per 5 ETDRS letter score or 1 line; 95% CI, 1.40-1.46), baseline age (HR, 0.88 per 5 years; 95% CI, 0.86-0.90), and injection number (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.10-1.15). Of the 4439 of 7802 patients (57%) attaining this outcome, median time sustained at an ETDRS letter score of 70 (20/40) or better was 1.1 years (95% CI, 1.1-1.2).
Conclusions and relevance: in this cohort study, patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration beginning anti-VEGF therapy were more likely to experience positive visual outcomes within the first 2.0 years after treatment, typically maintaining this outcome for 1.1 years but then deteriorating to poor vision within 8.7 years. These findings demonstrate the potential usefulness of the proposed analyses. This data set, combined with the statistical approach for retrospective analyses, may provide long-term prognostic information for patients newly diagnosed with this condition.
57-67
Fu, Dun Jack
aa47e7c6-a0ed-4d51-9c55-4151ae3839d6
Keenan, Tiarnan D.
f0052375-87d6-4ebf-a07a-a007000fd9a0
Faes, Livia
a07a4a9f-39a4-471e-942b-2c9cae8462e4
Lim, Ernest
9bd357cc-9b45-414f-9e65-b6f2f832d552
Wagner, Siegfried K.
726fcef3-87d7-4416-84ed-bd8d309dc3fc
Moraes, Gabriella
9abde641-a6e8-4f1d-b7da-0e285a7b57ea
Huemer, Josef
9eb9af0d-ea68-432f-be10-6ef1bdb7c579
Kern, Christoph
9a86401f-28fa-447d-9bcb-6ea300f22d47
Patel, Praveen J.
91baf7b2-de1c-40aa-b3f4-7cc7007220f2
Balaskas, Konstantinos
6a559a09-c161-435a-aa2c-b9f0f3e1521a
Sim, Dawn A.
038c56a4-5440-436d-8357-f3a4a79581ef
Bunce, Catey
6b999375-2e40-497f-8076-9435b3cba2f4
Stratton, Irene
772f25b9-23c0-4240-a3f6-1e76b03b172f
Keane, Pearse A.
fc1d555b-277f-45e1-ac72-727766911e6f
January 2021
Fu, Dun Jack
aa47e7c6-a0ed-4d51-9c55-4151ae3839d6
Keenan, Tiarnan D.
f0052375-87d6-4ebf-a07a-a007000fd9a0
Faes, Livia
a07a4a9f-39a4-471e-942b-2c9cae8462e4
Lim, Ernest
9bd357cc-9b45-414f-9e65-b6f2f832d552
Wagner, Siegfried K.
726fcef3-87d7-4416-84ed-bd8d309dc3fc
Moraes, Gabriella
9abde641-a6e8-4f1d-b7da-0e285a7b57ea
Huemer, Josef
9eb9af0d-ea68-432f-be10-6ef1bdb7c579
Kern, Christoph
9a86401f-28fa-447d-9bcb-6ea300f22d47
Patel, Praveen J.
91baf7b2-de1c-40aa-b3f4-7cc7007220f2
Balaskas, Konstantinos
6a559a09-c161-435a-aa2c-b9f0f3e1521a
Sim, Dawn A.
038c56a4-5440-436d-8357-f3a4a79581ef
Bunce, Catey
6b999375-2e40-497f-8076-9435b3cba2f4
Stratton, Irene
772f25b9-23c0-4240-a3f6-1e76b03b172f
Keane, Pearse A.
fc1d555b-277f-45e1-ac72-727766911e6f
Fu, Dun Jack, Keenan, Tiarnan D., Faes, Livia, Lim, Ernest, Wagner, Siegfried K., Moraes, Gabriella, Huemer, Josef, Kern, Christoph, Patel, Praveen J., Balaskas, Konstantinos, Sim, Dawn A., Bunce, Catey, Stratton, Irene and Keane, Pearse A.
(2021)
Insights from survival analyses during 12 years of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
JAMA Ophthalmology, 139 (1), .
(doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.5044).
Abstract
Importance: although multiple imputation models for missing data and the use of mixed-effects models generally provide better outcome estimates than using only observed data or last observation carried forward in clinical trials, such approaches usually cannot be applied to visual outcomes from retrospective analyses of clinical practice settings, also called real-world outcomes.
Objective: to explore the potential usefulness of survival analysis techniques for retrospective clinical practice visual outcomes.
Design, setting, and participants: this retrospective cohort study covered a 12-year observation period at a tertiary eye center. Of 10 744 eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration receiving anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy between October 28, 2008, and February 1, 2020, 7802 eyes met study criteria (treatment-naive, first-treated eyes starting anti-VEGF therapy). Eyes were excluded from the analysis if they received photodynamic therapy or macular laser, any previous anti-VEGF therapy, treatment with anti-VEGF agents other than ranibizumab or aflibercept, or had an unknown date or visual acuity (VA) value at first injection.
Main outcomes and measures: Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to consider VA reaching an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter score of 70 (Snellen equivalent, 20/40) or better, duration of VA sustained at or better than 70 (20/40), and VA declining to 35 (20/200) or worse.
Results: a total of 7802 patients (mean [SD] age, 78.7 [8.8] years; 4776 women [61.2%]; and 4785 White [61.3%]) were included in the study. The median time to attaining a VA letter score greater than or equal to 70 (20/40) was 2.0 years (95% CI, 1.87-2.32) after the first anti-VEGF injection. Predictive features were baseline VA (hazard ratio [HR], 1.43 per 5 ETDRS letter score or 1 line; 95% CI, 1.40-1.46), baseline age (HR, 0.88 per 5 years; 95% CI, 0.86-0.90), and injection number (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.10-1.15). Of the 4439 of 7802 patients (57%) attaining this outcome, median time sustained at an ETDRS letter score of 70 (20/40) or better was 1.1 years (95% CI, 1.1-1.2).
Conclusions and relevance: in this cohort study, patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration beginning anti-VEGF therapy were more likely to experience positive visual outcomes within the first 2.0 years after treatment, typically maintaining this outcome for 1.1 years but then deteriorating to poor vision within 8.7 years. These findings demonstrate the potential usefulness of the proposed analyses. This data set, combined with the statistical approach for retrospective analyses, may provide long-term prognostic information for patients newly diagnosed with this condition.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 19 November 2020
Published date: January 2021
Additional Information:
Funding Information: external consultant for DeepMind and Optos outside the submitted work. Dr Faes reported receiving financial compensation from Bayer and Allergan outside the submitted work. Dr Keenan reported receiving grant funding from Bayer (Global Ophthalmology Award Program awardee) through the National Eye Institute. Dr Huemer reported receiving speaker fees from Bayer and Zeiss outside the submitted work. Dr Balaskas reported receiving speaker fees from Novartis, Bayer, Alimera, and Allergan and research support from Novartis and Bayer outside the submitted work. Dr Lim reported serving as an employee of Ufonia Limited, a telemedicine company, outside the submitted work. Dr Patel reported receiving lecturing, educational travel, and advisory board fees from Bayer UK, Novartis UK, and Roche UK. Dr Sim reported receiving grants and personal fees from Allergan and Big Picture Eye Health; personal fees from Bayer and Novartis; and grants from Oculocare Ltd outside the submitted work. Dr Fu reported receiving financial compensation from Allergan and DeepMind outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 487093
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/487093
ISSN: 2168-6165
PURE UUID: 09ac5039-e737-43dc-9c68-fef43cec3eed
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 13 Feb 2024 17:32
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:01
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Dun Jack Fu
Author:
Tiarnan D. Keenan
Author:
Livia Faes
Author:
Ernest Lim
Author:
Siegfried K. Wagner
Author:
Gabriella Moraes
Author:
Josef Huemer
Author:
Christoph Kern
Author:
Praveen J. Patel
Author:
Konstantinos Balaskas
Author:
Dawn A. Sim
Author:
Catey Bunce
Author:
Irene Stratton
Author:
Pearse A. Keane
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics