System-level and patient-level explanations for non-attendance at diabetic retinopathy screening in Sutton and Merton (London, UK): a qualitative analysis of a service evaluation
System-level and patient-level explanations for non-attendance at diabetic retinopathy screening in Sutton and Merton (London, UK): a qualitative analysis of a service evaluation
Objectives: non-attendance at diabetic retinopathy screening has financial implications for screening programmes and potential clinical costs to patients. We sought to identify explanations for why patients had never attended a screening appointment (never attendance) in one programme.
Design: qualitative analysis of a service evaluation.
Setting: one South London (UK) diabetic eye screening programme.
Participants and procedure: patients who had been registered with one screening programme for at least 18 months and who had never attended screening within the programme were contacted by telephone to ascertain why this was the case. Patients’ general practices were also contacted for information about why each patient may not have attended. Framework analysis was used to interpret responses.
Results: of the 296 patients, 38 were not eligible for screening and of the 258 eligible patients, 159 were not contactable (31 of these had phone numbers that were not in use). We obtained reasons from patients/general practices/clinical notes for non-attendance for 146 (57%) patients. A number of patient-level and system-level factors were given to explain non-attendance. Patient-level factors included having other commitments, being anxious about screening, not engaging with any diabetes care and being misinformed about screening. System-level factors included miscommunication about where the patient lives, their clinical situation and practical problems that could have been overcome had their existence been shared between programmes.
Conclusions: this service evaluation provides unique insight into the patient-level and system-level reasons for never attendance at diabetic retinopathy screening. Improved sharing of relevant information between providers has the potential to facilitate increased uptake of screening. Greater awareness of patient-level barriers may help providers offer a more accessible service.
Strutton, R.
7e1455fa-0244-44e3-999b-3f5eaa154308
Du Chemin, A.
faffc2c2-8deb-42c2-a519-041c0dabdfc9
Stratton, I.M.
772f25b9-23c0-4240-a3f6-1e76b03b172f
Forster, A.S.
2d225d22-dd1d-4d2b-970c-45471212354f
2016
Strutton, R.
7e1455fa-0244-44e3-999b-3f5eaa154308
Du Chemin, A.
faffc2c2-8deb-42c2-a519-041c0dabdfc9
Stratton, I.M.
772f25b9-23c0-4240-a3f6-1e76b03b172f
Forster, A.S.
2d225d22-dd1d-4d2b-970c-45471212354f
Strutton, R., Du Chemin, A., Stratton, I.M. and Forster, A.S.
(2016)
System-level and patient-level explanations for non-attendance at diabetic retinopathy screening in Sutton and Merton (London, UK): a qualitative analysis of a service evaluation.
BMJ Open, 6 (5), [e010952].
(doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010952).
Abstract
Objectives: non-attendance at diabetic retinopathy screening has financial implications for screening programmes and potential clinical costs to patients. We sought to identify explanations for why patients had never attended a screening appointment (never attendance) in one programme.
Design: qualitative analysis of a service evaluation.
Setting: one South London (UK) diabetic eye screening programme.
Participants and procedure: patients who had been registered with one screening programme for at least 18 months and who had never attended screening within the programme were contacted by telephone to ascertain why this was the case. Patients’ general practices were also contacted for information about why each patient may not have attended. Framework analysis was used to interpret responses.
Results: of the 296 patients, 38 were not eligible for screening and of the 258 eligible patients, 159 were not contactable (31 of these had phone numbers that were not in use). We obtained reasons from patients/general practices/clinical notes for non-attendance for 146 (57%) patients. A number of patient-level and system-level factors were given to explain non-attendance. Patient-level factors included having other commitments, being anxious about screening, not engaging with any diabetes care and being misinformed about screening. System-level factors included miscommunication about where the patient lives, their clinical situation and practical problems that could have been overcome had their existence been shared between programmes.
Conclusions: this service evaluation provides unique insight into the patient-level and system-level reasons for never attendance at diabetic retinopathy screening. Improved sharing of relevant information between providers has the potential to facilitate increased uptake of screening. Greater awareness of patient-level barriers may help providers offer a more accessible service.
Text
3044197
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 29 April 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 18 May 2016
Published date: 2016
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 487141
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/487141
ISSN: 2044-6055
PURE UUID: 8bfcac17-ae78-48dd-afe5-aa5c18f5913d
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 14 Feb 2024 17:38
Last modified: 06 Jun 2024 02:10
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
R. Strutton
Author:
A. Du Chemin
Author:
I.M. Stratton
Author:
A.S. Forster
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics