Modification of the convexity prior but not the light-from-above prior in visual search with shaded objects
Modification of the convexity prior but not the light-from-above prior in visual search with shaded objects
Studies of visual search performance with shaded stimuli, in which the target is rotated by 180º relative to the distracters, typically demonstrate more efficient performance in stimuli with vertical compared to horizontal shading gradients. In addition, performance is usually better for vertically shaded stimuli with top-light (seen as convex) distracters compared to those with bottom-light (seen as concave) distracters. These findings have been cited as evidence for the use of the prior assumptions of overhead lighting and convexity in the interpretation of shaded stimuli and suggest that these priors affect preattentive processing. Here we attempt to modify these priors by providing observers with visual-haptic training in an environment inconsistent with their priors. Observers’ performance was measured in a visual search task and a shape judgement task before and after training. Following training we found a reduced asymmetry between visual search performance with convex and concave distracters, suggesting a modification of the convexity prior. However, although evidence of a change in the light-from-above prior was found in the shape judgement task, no change was found in the visual search task. We conclude that experience can modify the convexity prior at a preattentive stage in processing, however our training did not modify the light-from-above prior that is measured via visual search.
vision, shape-from-shading perception, search, shape, learning
1-10
Champion, R.A.
c039162b-a421-48cb-af81-88e10825f2a9
Adams, W.J.
25685aaa-fc54-4d25-8d65-f35f4c5ab688
29 October 2007
Champion, R.A.
c039162b-a421-48cb-af81-88e10825f2a9
Adams, W.J.
25685aaa-fc54-4d25-8d65-f35f4c5ab688
Champion, R.A. and Adams, W.J.
(2007)
Modification of the convexity prior but not the light-from-above prior in visual search with shaded objects.
Journal of Vision, 7 (13), .
(doi:10.1167/7.13.10).
Abstract
Studies of visual search performance with shaded stimuli, in which the target is rotated by 180º relative to the distracters, typically demonstrate more efficient performance in stimuli with vertical compared to horizontal shading gradients. In addition, performance is usually better for vertically shaded stimuli with top-light (seen as convex) distracters compared to those with bottom-light (seen as concave) distracters. These findings have been cited as evidence for the use of the prior assumptions of overhead lighting and convexity in the interpretation of shaded stimuli and suggest that these priors affect preattentive processing. Here we attempt to modify these priors by providing observers with visual-haptic training in an environment inconsistent with their priors. Observers’ performance was measured in a visual search task and a shape judgement task before and after training. Following training we found a reduced asymmetry between visual search performance with convex and concave distracters, suggesting a modification of the convexity prior. However, although evidence of a change in the light-from-above prior was found in the shape judgement task, no change was found in the visual search task. We conclude that experience can modify the convexity prior at a preattentive stage in processing, however our training did not modify the light-from-above prior that is measured via visual search.
Text
ChampionAdams2007-jov-7-13-10.pdf
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Published date: 29 October 2007
Keywords:
vision, shape-from-shading perception, search, shape, learning
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 48718
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/48718
ISSN: 1534-7362
PURE UUID: f0e6eb77-8ffb-4119-aa58-8c5e6a5e6a0a
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 10 Oct 2007
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:39
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
R.A. Champion
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics