Digital communication between clinician and patient in General Practice and the impact on marginalised groups: a realist review
Digital communication between clinician and patient in General Practice and the impact on marginalised groups: a realist review
Background: increasingly, the NHS is embracing the use of digital communication technology for communication between clinicians and patients. Policymakers deem digital clinical communication as presenting a solution to the capacity issues currently faced by general practice. There is some concern that these technologies may exacerbate existing inequalities in accessing health care. It is not known what impact they may have on groups who are already marginalised in their ability to access general practice.
Aim: to assess the potential impact of the availability of digital clinician?patient communication on marginalised groups? access to general practice in the UK.
Design and setting: realist review in general practice.
Method: a four-step realist review process was used: to define the scope of the review; to search for and scrutinise evidence; to extract and synthesise evidence; and to develop a narrative, including hypotheses.
Results: digital communication has the potential to overcome the following barriers for marginalised groups: practical access issues, previous negative experiences with healthcare service/staff, and stigmatising reactions from staff and other patients. It may reduce patient-related barriers by offering anonymity and offers advantages to patients who require an interpreter. It does not impact on inability to communicate with healthcare professionals or on a lack of candidacy. It is likely to work best in the context of a pre-existing clinician?patient relationship.
Conclusion: digital communication technology offers increased opportunities for marginalised groups to access health care. However, it cannot remove all barriers to care for these groups. It is likely that they will remain disadvantaged relative to other population groups after their introduction.
Huxley, Caroline J.
e3827696-9208-41f7-9dd6-1a312a145a7d
Atherton, Helen
9bb8932e-7bb7-4781-ab97-114613de99b1
Watkins, Jocelyn
29277ca2-2114-46ac-8204-d996ab5c87fc
Griffiths, Frances
1bb8e612-abbb-4b98-8dc8-83558033d886
Huxley, Caroline J.
e3827696-9208-41f7-9dd6-1a312a145a7d
Atherton, Helen
9bb8932e-7bb7-4781-ab97-114613de99b1
Watkins, Jocelyn
29277ca2-2114-46ac-8204-d996ab5c87fc
Griffiths, Frances
1bb8e612-abbb-4b98-8dc8-83558033d886
Huxley, Caroline J., Atherton, Helen, Watkins, Jocelyn and Griffiths, Frances
(2015)
Digital communication between clinician and patient in General Practice and the impact on marginalised groups: a realist review.
British Journal of General Practice, 65 (641).
(doi:10.3399/bjgp15X687853).
Abstract
Background: increasingly, the NHS is embracing the use of digital communication technology for communication between clinicians and patients. Policymakers deem digital clinical communication as presenting a solution to the capacity issues currently faced by general practice. There is some concern that these technologies may exacerbate existing inequalities in accessing health care. It is not known what impact they may have on groups who are already marginalised in their ability to access general practice.
Aim: to assess the potential impact of the availability of digital clinician?patient communication on marginalised groups? access to general practice in the UK.
Design and setting: realist review in general practice.
Method: a four-step realist review process was used: to define the scope of the review; to search for and scrutinise evidence; to extract and synthesise evidence; and to develop a narrative, including hypotheses.
Results: digital communication has the potential to overcome the following barriers for marginalised groups: practical access issues, previous negative experiences with healthcare service/staff, and stigmatising reactions from staff and other patients. It may reduce patient-related barriers by offering anonymity and offers advantages to patients who require an interpreter. It does not impact on inability to communicate with healthcare professionals or on a lack of candidacy. It is likely to work best in the context of a pre-existing clinician?patient relationship.
Conclusion: digital communication technology offers increased opportunities for marginalised groups to access health care. However, it cannot remove all barriers to care for these groups. It is likely that they will remain disadvantaged relative to other population groups after their introduction.
Text
e813.full
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 7 July 2015
e-pub ahead of print date: 29 November 2015
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 487249
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/487249
ISSN: 0960-1643
PURE UUID: 97439070-d6ee-4b6e-8ac6-b58208260f22
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 16 Feb 2024 15:22
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:18
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Caroline J. Huxley
Author:
Helen Atherton
Author:
Jocelyn Watkins
Author:
Frances Griffiths
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics