Evaluating quality and reputation of human resource management
Evaluating quality and reputation of human resource management
Reports that the evaluation of organizational units is of great importance for the organization. However, we face severe difficulties when conducting such processes, especially with regard to the human resource management (HRM) department. Discusses conventional approaches to such evaluation, focuses on their limitations, and suggests a new method for such an evaluation. The suggested method is based on an additive measure comprising HRM practices carried out in the organization. It was applied in an empirical study in which the HRM quality of 51 organizations was evaluated by four different sources: the organization’s top management, the organization’s employees, the environment (assessment of reputation), and an objective measure that was established based on the suggested approach. Concludes that, among the set of intercorrelations between the sources, the last one had the highest correlation with the others, which may indicate the value of the suggested method.
377-394
Baruch, Yehuda
25b89777-def4-4958-afdc-0ceab43efe8a
1 October 1997
Baruch, Yehuda
25b89777-def4-4958-afdc-0ceab43efe8a
Baruch, Yehuda
(1997)
Evaluating quality and reputation of human resource management.
Personnel Review, 26 (5), .
(doi:10.1108/00483489710176057).
Abstract
Reports that the evaluation of organizational units is of great importance for the organization. However, we face severe difficulties when conducting such processes, especially with regard to the human resource management (HRM) department. Discusses conventional approaches to such evaluation, focuses on their limitations, and suggests a new method for such an evaluation. The suggested method is based on an additive measure comprising HRM practices carried out in the organization. It was applied in an empirical study in which the HRM quality of 51 organizations was evaluated by four different sources: the organization’s top management, the organization’s employees, the environment (assessment of reputation), and an objective measure that was established based on the suggested approach. Concludes that, among the set of intercorrelations between the sources, the last one had the highest correlation with the others, which may indicate the value of the suggested method.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1 October 1997
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 487265
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/487265
ISSN: 0048-3486
PURE UUID: 3b5e50fc-723b-46b4-95bc-e2b0e4666d7b
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 16 Feb 2024 17:15
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:25
Export record
Altmetrics
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics
