The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Training primary care staff in delivering the primary care consultation remotely: a systematic review

Training primary care staff in delivering the primary care consultation remotely: a systematic review
Training primary care staff in delivering the primary care consultation remotely: a systematic review

Background: remote consultation is widely used in primary care, and its use has increased greatly since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite this, primary care clinicians lack formal training in delivering remote consultation. There is a need to understand how training might best be delivered, and what evidence there is to support this.

Aim: to summarise existing published literature about training primary care staff in conducting primary care consultation remotely, to outline which models of training may be effective, and to identify unanswered questions for future research.

Design & setting: systematic review of English language studies in primary care included in Medline (Ovid), Cochrane Database, PubMed, Embase (Ovid), Web of Science, and CINAHL from 2010-2021; and in Google results from 2010-2022.

Method: databases were searched using a predefined search strategy. Title, abstract, and full-text screening was conducted to identify eligible studies for inclusion in the review. The quality of included studies was assessed, and findings were synthesised to answer the research questions.

Results: we included 10 studies. Seven examined training on remote consultation with trainee GPs or residents, and three examined training on remote consultation with qualified primary care clinicians. Training described led to positive change overall, including increased confidence and self-efficacy in delivering remote consultations. Furthermore, trainees reported increased use of remote consultation, increased efficiency, and increased engagement from patients. Studies where training involved workshops or didactic learning alongside experiential learning resulted in more positive feelings and more confidence about how technology could aid consultations.

Conclusion: there is limited evidence on training primary care staff in conducting remote consultation. Available evidence indicates that training has a positive impact on the ability of clinicians and staff to deliver remote consultation.

Parsons, Jo
a0ecd433-2fc5-45c1-ab3c-58c1cb28f281
Salman, Bilal
caec206e-7dad-412f-9ebe-50d31a986dba
Leach, Helen
903b1c8e-d29f-4618-9580-c7b0ad0fd7df
Watson, Eleanor
d1a10cf6-e06a-4e9d-9d6b-672157615093
Atherton, Helen
9bb8932e-7bb7-4781-ab97-114613de99b1
Parsons, Jo
a0ecd433-2fc5-45c1-ab3c-58c1cb28f281
Salman, Bilal
caec206e-7dad-412f-9ebe-50d31a986dba
Leach, Helen
903b1c8e-d29f-4618-9580-c7b0ad0fd7df
Watson, Eleanor
d1a10cf6-e06a-4e9d-9d6b-672157615093
Atherton, Helen
9bb8932e-7bb7-4781-ab97-114613de99b1

Parsons, Jo, Salman, Bilal, Leach, Helen, Watson, Eleanor and Atherton, Helen (2023) Training primary care staff in delivering the primary care consultation remotely: a systematic review. BJGP Open, 7 (4). (doi:10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0110).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: remote consultation is widely used in primary care, and its use has increased greatly since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite this, primary care clinicians lack formal training in delivering remote consultation. There is a need to understand how training might best be delivered, and what evidence there is to support this.

Aim: to summarise existing published literature about training primary care staff in conducting primary care consultation remotely, to outline which models of training may be effective, and to identify unanswered questions for future research.

Design & setting: systematic review of English language studies in primary care included in Medline (Ovid), Cochrane Database, PubMed, Embase (Ovid), Web of Science, and CINAHL from 2010-2021; and in Google results from 2010-2022.

Method: databases were searched using a predefined search strategy. Title, abstract, and full-text screening was conducted to identify eligible studies for inclusion in the review. The quality of included studies was assessed, and findings were synthesised to answer the research questions.

Results: we included 10 studies. Seven examined training on remote consultation with trainee GPs or residents, and three examined training on remote consultation with qualified primary care clinicians. Training described led to positive change overall, including increased confidence and self-efficacy in delivering remote consultations. Furthermore, trainees reported increased use of remote consultation, increased efficiency, and increased engagement from patients. Studies where training involved workshops or didactic learning alongside experiential learning resulted in more positive feelings and more confidence about how technology could aid consultations.

Conclusion: there is limited evidence on training primary care staff in conducting remote consultation. Available evidence indicates that training has a positive impact on the ability of clinicians and staff to deliver remote consultation.

Text
BJGPO.2023.0110.full - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (531kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 19 June 2023
Published date: 19 December 2023
Additional Information: Copyright © 2023, The Authors.

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 487300
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/487300
PURE UUID: 9c8ce335-e98c-4999-90c2-a341c8e4c042
ORCID for Helen Atherton: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7072-1925

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Feb 2024 17:26
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:18

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Jo Parsons
Author: Bilal Salman
Author: Helen Leach
Author: Eleanor Watson
Author: Helen Atherton ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×