Unintended consequences of patient online access to health records: a qualitative study in UK primary care
Unintended consequences of patient online access to health records: a qualitative study in UK primary care
Background: health systems are seeking to harness digital tools to promote patient autonomy and increase the efficiency of care worldwide. The NHS Long Term Plan created the right for patients to access 'digital first' primary care by 2023-2024, including online patient access to full medical records.
Aim: to identify and understand the unintended consequences of online patient access to medical records.
Design and setting: qualitative interview study in 10 general practices in South West and North West England. Method Semi-structured individual interviews with 13 patients and 16 general practice staff with experience of patient online access to health records.
Results: online access generated unintended consequences that negatively impacted patients' understanding of their health care, with patients finding surprising or difficult to interpret information. Online access impacted GPs' documentation practices, such as when GPs pre-emptively attempted to minimise potential misunderstandings to aid patient understanding of their health care. In other cases, this negatively impacted the quality of the records and patient safety when GPs avoided documenting speculations or concerns. Contrary to assumptions that workload would be reduced, online access introduced extra work, such as managing and monitoring access, and taking measures to prevent possible harm to patients.
Conclusion: the unintended consequences described by both staff and patients show that, to achieve the intended consequences set out in NHS policy, additional work is necessary to prepare records for sharing and to prepare patients about what to expect. It is crucial that practices are adequately supported and resourced to manage the unintended consequences of online access, now that it is the default position. A table of potential unintended consequences and mitigation measures is provided to aid practice managers and clinicians implementing online access.
e67-e74
Turner, Andrew
f2f35612-5fdd-4e89-9fd0-b0f50a55a149
Morris, Rebecca
ee1ba26b-7aba-44da-a146-5a0027b9d9b8
McDonagh, Lorraine
9c8fb51f-565c-417c-bad5-eb11cf44cf77
Hamilton, Fiona
5bbcbac0-5b6e-42c6-8cad-39f87def7a14
Blake, Sarah
519e6751-0309-4d7c-b9f0-5ac8e49a7f33
Farr, Michelle
ff3e11bb-6943-488b-929a-2f003a5a4a8d
Stevenson, Fiona
881eb2a9-d7a8-449d-be50-ead6fda5cd3e
Banks, Jon
82a4e844-d350-4a99-a6c2-e9f221a2a4cb
Atherton, Helen
9bb8932e-7bb7-4781-ab97-114613de99b1
Rakhra, Dylan
15dd02b7-6da3-408e-a616-9df23e9aaaab
Lasseter, Gemma
5d143f95-5052-41f2-b3a2-b0de64ba63e8
Feder, Gene
0fba983e-5a70-4280-99af-69811d2d6a56
Ziebland, Sue
9a00bdc5-7b90-4dae-a503-1799f5e80b17
Hyde, Emma
d8253c3d-3439-4352-a8b5-4d2cf02e81eb
Powell, John
0616c5bf-0ce6-48ef-9b89-45a72529beb1
Horwood, Jeremy
17a93c97-cc9f-4914-ab17-9fdb7dc034e4
January 2023
Turner, Andrew
f2f35612-5fdd-4e89-9fd0-b0f50a55a149
Morris, Rebecca
ee1ba26b-7aba-44da-a146-5a0027b9d9b8
McDonagh, Lorraine
9c8fb51f-565c-417c-bad5-eb11cf44cf77
Hamilton, Fiona
5bbcbac0-5b6e-42c6-8cad-39f87def7a14
Blake, Sarah
519e6751-0309-4d7c-b9f0-5ac8e49a7f33
Farr, Michelle
ff3e11bb-6943-488b-929a-2f003a5a4a8d
Stevenson, Fiona
881eb2a9-d7a8-449d-be50-ead6fda5cd3e
Banks, Jon
82a4e844-d350-4a99-a6c2-e9f221a2a4cb
Atherton, Helen
9bb8932e-7bb7-4781-ab97-114613de99b1
Rakhra, Dylan
15dd02b7-6da3-408e-a616-9df23e9aaaab
Lasseter, Gemma
5d143f95-5052-41f2-b3a2-b0de64ba63e8
Feder, Gene
0fba983e-5a70-4280-99af-69811d2d6a56
Ziebland, Sue
9a00bdc5-7b90-4dae-a503-1799f5e80b17
Hyde, Emma
d8253c3d-3439-4352-a8b5-4d2cf02e81eb
Powell, John
0616c5bf-0ce6-48ef-9b89-45a72529beb1
Horwood, Jeremy
17a93c97-cc9f-4914-ab17-9fdb7dc034e4
Turner, Andrew, Morris, Rebecca, McDonagh, Lorraine, Hamilton, Fiona, Blake, Sarah, Farr, Michelle, Stevenson, Fiona, Banks, Jon, Atherton, Helen, Rakhra, Dylan, Lasseter, Gemma, Feder, Gene, Ziebland, Sue, Hyde, Emma, Powell, John and Horwood, Jeremy
(2023)
Unintended consequences of patient online access to health records: a qualitative study in UK primary care.
British Journal of General Practice, 73 (726), .
(doi:10.3399/BJGP.2021.0720).
Abstract
Background: health systems are seeking to harness digital tools to promote patient autonomy and increase the efficiency of care worldwide. The NHS Long Term Plan created the right for patients to access 'digital first' primary care by 2023-2024, including online patient access to full medical records.
Aim: to identify and understand the unintended consequences of online patient access to medical records.
Design and setting: qualitative interview study in 10 general practices in South West and North West England. Method Semi-structured individual interviews with 13 patients and 16 general practice staff with experience of patient online access to health records.
Results: online access generated unintended consequences that negatively impacted patients' understanding of their health care, with patients finding surprising or difficult to interpret information. Online access impacted GPs' documentation practices, such as when GPs pre-emptively attempted to minimise potential misunderstandings to aid patient understanding of their health care. In other cases, this negatively impacted the quality of the records and patient safety when GPs avoided documenting speculations or concerns. Contrary to assumptions that workload would be reduced, online access introduced extra work, such as managing and monitoring access, and taking measures to prevent possible harm to patients.
Conclusion: the unintended consequences described by both staff and patients show that, to achieve the intended consequences set out in NHS policy, additional work is necessary to prepare records for sharing and to prepare patients about what to expect. It is crucial that practices are adequately supported and resourced to manage the unintended consequences of online access, now that it is the default position. A table of potential unintended consequences and mitigation measures is provided to aid practice managers and clinicians implementing online access.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 28 August 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 21 December 2022
Published date: January 2023
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 487301
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/487301
ISSN: 0960-1643
PURE UUID: 7865e51d-9131-4d8e-9aaf-10a895d08330
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 16 Feb 2024 17:26
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:18
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Andrew Turner
Author:
Rebecca Morris
Author:
Lorraine McDonagh
Author:
Fiona Hamilton
Author:
Sarah Blake
Author:
Michelle Farr
Author:
Fiona Stevenson
Author:
Jon Banks
Author:
Helen Atherton
Author:
Dylan Rakhra
Author:
Gemma Lasseter
Author:
Gene Feder
Author:
Sue Ziebland
Author:
Emma Hyde
Author:
John Powell
Author:
Jeremy Horwood
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics