The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Using alternatives to face-to-face consultations: a survey of prevalence and attitudes in general practice

Using alternatives to face-to-face consultations: a survey of prevalence and attitudes in general practice
Using alternatives to face-to-face consultations: a survey of prevalence and attitudes in general practice
Background: the ubiquitous use of communication technologies has led to an expectation that a similar approach should extend to health care. Despite considerable rhetoric about the need for general practices to offer alternatives to face-to-face consultations, such as telephone, email, and internet video consultations, the extent to which such technologies are actually used at present is unclear.

Aim the aim of the survey was to identify the frequency and range of ways in which general practices are providing (or planning) alternatives to face-to-face consultations.

Design and setting: a postal survey of practices around Bristol, Oxford, Lothian, the Highlands, and the Western Isles of Scotland.

Method: a postal questionnaire survey was sent to each of the GPs and practice managers of 421 practices between January and May 2015.

Results: a response was received from 319/421 practices (76%). Although the majority of the practices reported that they were conducting telephone consultations frequently (n = 211/318, 66%), fewer were implementing email consultations (n = 18/318, 6%), and most (n = 169/318, 53%) had no plans to introduce this. None were currently using internet video, and 86% (n = 273/318) had no plans to introduce internet video consultations. These findings were repeated in the reported use of alternatives to face-to-face consultations at an individual GP level. Optional free text responses were completed by 28% of responders, and offered an explanation for the (often perceived) barriers and incentives for implementation.

Conclusion: despite policy pressure to introduce consultations by email and internet video, there is a general reluctance among GPs to implement alternatives to face-to-face consultations. This identifies a substantial gap between rhetoric and reality in terms of the likelihood of certain alternatives (email, video) changing practice in the near future.
0960-1643
e460-e466
Brant, Heather
e3112697-fc0a-466c-bb40-5f6f89a214d1
Atherton, Helen
9bb8932e-7bb7-4781-ab97-114613de99b1
Ziebland, Sue
9a00bdc5-7b90-4dae-a503-1799f5e80b17
McKinstry, Brian
63563c1a-feed-42b7-8288-ebbd1d6b3dad
Campbell, John
40fcc705-8391-4cde-bb69-266bbb7f23ed
Salisbury, Chris
50e9a5a0-c074-4af8-9b1b-e1e8408aae3c
Brant, Heather
e3112697-fc0a-466c-bb40-5f6f89a214d1
Atherton, Helen
9bb8932e-7bb7-4781-ab97-114613de99b1
Ziebland, Sue
9a00bdc5-7b90-4dae-a503-1799f5e80b17
McKinstry, Brian
63563c1a-feed-42b7-8288-ebbd1d6b3dad
Campbell, John
40fcc705-8391-4cde-bb69-266bbb7f23ed
Salisbury, Chris
50e9a5a0-c074-4af8-9b1b-e1e8408aae3c

Brant, Heather, Atherton, Helen, Ziebland, Sue, McKinstry, Brian, Campbell, John and Salisbury, Chris (2016) Using alternatives to face-to-face consultations: a survey of prevalence and attitudes in general practice. British Journal of General Practice, 66 (648), e460-e466. (doi:10.3399/bjgp16X685597).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: the ubiquitous use of communication technologies has led to an expectation that a similar approach should extend to health care. Despite considerable rhetoric about the need for general practices to offer alternatives to face-to-face consultations, such as telephone, email, and internet video consultations, the extent to which such technologies are actually used at present is unclear.

Aim the aim of the survey was to identify the frequency and range of ways in which general practices are providing (or planning) alternatives to face-to-face consultations.

Design and setting: a postal survey of practices around Bristol, Oxford, Lothian, the Highlands, and the Western Isles of Scotland.

Method: a postal questionnaire survey was sent to each of the GPs and practice managers of 421 practices between January and May 2015.

Results: a response was received from 319/421 practices (76%). Although the majority of the practices reported that they were conducting telephone consultations frequently (n = 211/318, 66%), fewer were implementing email consultations (n = 18/318, 6%), and most (n = 169/318, 53%) had no plans to introduce this. None were currently using internet video, and 86% (n = 273/318) had no plans to introduce internet video consultations. These findings were repeated in the reported use of alternatives to face-to-face consultations at an individual GP level. Optional free text responses were completed by 28% of responders, and offered an explanation for the (often perceived) barriers and incentives for implementation.

Conclusion: despite policy pressure to introduce consultations by email and internet video, there is a general reluctance among GPs to implement alternatives to face-to-face consultations. This identifies a substantial gap between rhetoric and reality in terms of the likelihood of certain alternatives (email, video) changing practice in the near future.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 3 February 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 30 June 2016

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 487304
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/487304
ISSN: 0960-1643
PURE UUID: c8401a89-babf-48ae-bdaa-bb3a6d787d08
ORCID for Helen Atherton: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7072-1925

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Feb 2024 17:26
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:18

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Heather Brant
Author: Helen Atherton ORCID iD
Author: Sue Ziebland
Author: Brian McKinstry
Author: John Campbell
Author: Chris Salisbury

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×