The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Explicitly linking teaching and assessment of communication skills

Explicitly linking teaching and assessment of communication skills
Explicitly linking teaching and assessment of communication skills

BACKGROUND: Communication skills teaching is known to be effective, but students feel there are discrepancies between how communication skills are taught and how they are assessed.

AIMS: This study examined the effect of using standard assessment criteria during communication skills teaching on students' performance in an end-of-year summative OSCE.

METHOD: Students attending their year 3 communication skills teaching were randomised to one of the following three conditions: the assessment criteria were available for reference on the medical school website; or students received the assessment criteria for use in the discussion and feedback; or each student's performance was graded by him- or her-self, his or her peers, the tutor and the actor using the standard assessment criteria.

RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the end-of-year OSCE performance of students who received the three different conditions. Actively using standard assessment criteria during teaching did not therefore improve OSCE performance. There were low but significant correlations between the tutors' assessment and the students' self-assessment and between the tutors' assessment and the peer group's assessment.

CONCLUSION: The congruence between observers in the assessments of role-played consultations using the standard assessment criteria indicates that the criteria may be helpful for summarizing feedback to students.

Communication, Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods, Educational Measurement/methods, Feedback, Psychological, Humans, Internet, Peer Review, Schools, Medical, Self-Assessment, Teaching
0142-159X
317-322
Cave, Judith
60c67e39-121a-49ca-8594-93e8e456464f
Washer, Peter
56606d06-2a86-4b07-b07b-fd3771f41fb7
Sampson, Patrick
69d9d8ad-a0ed-41ac-9e4c-e08ad651b822
Griffin, Mark
b23fa4ff-e82a-4d8f-ae60-83b4d2935525
Noble, Lorraine
1fd33d2c-b1b6-409a-9d3c-0e6a90223ad2
Cave, Judith
60c67e39-121a-49ca-8594-93e8e456464f
Washer, Peter
56606d06-2a86-4b07-b07b-fd3771f41fb7
Sampson, Patrick
69d9d8ad-a0ed-41ac-9e4c-e08ad651b822
Griffin, Mark
b23fa4ff-e82a-4d8f-ae60-83b4d2935525
Noble, Lorraine
1fd33d2c-b1b6-409a-9d3c-0e6a90223ad2

Cave, Judith, Washer, Peter, Sampson, Patrick, Griffin, Mark and Noble, Lorraine (2007) Explicitly linking teaching and assessment of communication skills. Medical Teacher, 29 (4), 317-322. (doi:10.1080/01421590701509654).

Record type: Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Communication skills teaching is known to be effective, but students feel there are discrepancies between how communication skills are taught and how they are assessed.

AIMS: This study examined the effect of using standard assessment criteria during communication skills teaching on students' performance in an end-of-year summative OSCE.

METHOD: Students attending their year 3 communication skills teaching were randomised to one of the following three conditions: the assessment criteria were available for reference on the medical school website; or students received the assessment criteria for use in the discussion and feedback; or each student's performance was graded by him- or her-self, his or her peers, the tutor and the actor using the standard assessment criteria.

RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the end-of-year OSCE performance of students who received the three different conditions. Actively using standard assessment criteria during teaching did not therefore improve OSCE performance. There were low but significant correlations between the tutors' assessment and the students' self-assessment and between the tutors' assessment and the peer group's assessment.

CONCLUSION: The congruence between observers in the assessments of role-played consultations using the standard assessment criteria indicates that the criteria may be helpful for summarizing feedback to students.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: May 2007
Keywords: Communication, Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods, Educational Measurement/methods, Feedback, Psychological, Humans, Internet, Peer Review, Schools, Medical, Self-Assessment, Teaching

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 487432
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/487432
ISSN: 0142-159X
PURE UUID: 453bcd2a-18ec-4f83-8d2b-343714ca6a9f

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Feb 2024 12:58
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 07:40

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Judith Cave
Author: Peter Washer
Author: Patrick Sampson
Author: Mark Griffin
Author: Lorraine Noble

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×