READ ME File For 'data_A_track-independent_vehicle_indicator.xlsx'

Dataset DOI: https://doi.org/10.5258/SOTON/D2965

ReadMe Author: Evangelos Ntotsios, University of Southampton [ORCID ID: 0000-0001-7382-0948]

This dataset supports the publication:
E. Ntotsios, D.J. Thompson, P. Reumers, G. Degrande, P. Bouvet, B. N�lain
A track-independent vehicle indicator for ground-borne noise and vibration emission classification
Transportation Geotechnics
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2024.101215

This dataset contains:

Data supporting the paper's figures. 

The figures are as follows:

Figure 2: Proposed weighting functions. (a) W_(F,1) in the 2-80 Hz one-third octave bands related to ground-borne vibration, (b) W_(F,2) in the 20-250 Hz one-third octave bands related to ground-borne noise.
Figure 3: Total track and wheel unevenness spectra and ISO 3095:2013 limit curve [3] (extrapolated to long wavelengths).
Figure 4: One-third octave force density levels L_F (?X,x?_r ) in dB (ref. 1 N/vm) for the eight train test cases obtained using the MOTIV model. (a) Train cases T1, T2, T3 and T4; (b) train cases T5, T6, T7 and T8.
Figure 5: Vehicle and track receptance (narrow band) in dB (ref 1 m/N) for the eight train test cases obtained using the MOTIV model. (a) Train cases T1, T2, T3 and T4; (b) train cases T5, T6, T7 and T8.
Figure 6: Weighted force density spectra L_F (?X,x?_r )+W_(F,1)   for vibration. (a) Train cases T1, T2, T3 and T4; (b) train cases T5, T6, T7 and T8.
Figure 7: Weighted force density spectra L_F (?X,x?_r )+W_(F,2)   for noise. (a) Train cases T1, T2, T3 and T4; (b) train cases T5, T6, T7 and T8.
Figure 8: Force density of generic IC train T1 at different sites. (a) Sites S1, S2, S3 and S4; (b) Sites S1, S5, S6, S7, S8 and S9.
Figure 9: Vibration velocity levels of generic IC train T1 at different sites. (a) Sites S1, S2, S3 and S4; (b) Sites S1, S5, S6, S7, S8 and S9.
Figure 10: Comparisons in dB ref. 1 of the differences relative to train T1 between the overall vibration levels at 8 m, 16 m, 32 m and the proposed TVI1 for different site conditions V1 to V10.
Figure 11: Comparisons in dB ref. 1 of the differences relative to train T1 between the overall noise levels at x_r= 8 m, 16 m, 32 m and the proposed TVI2 for different site conditions V1 to V10.
Figure 12: Vibration velocity levels of generic IC train T1 for site V1, at 16 m and 32 m from the track, and for site V10 at the ground surface 16 m from the tunnel centre.

Date of data collection: 01/02/2024.

Information about geographic location of data collection: University of Southampton, U.K.

Licence:CC-BY

Related projects: SILVARSTAR funded by the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking under the European Union�s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Grant Agreement 101015442.



Date that the file was created: February, 2024.