The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Net-02: a randomised, non-comparative, phase II trial of nal-IRI/5-FU or docetaxel as second-line therapy in patients with progressive poorly differentiated extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma

Net-02: a randomised, non-comparative, phase II trial of nal-IRI/5-FU or docetaxel as second-line therapy in patients with progressive poorly differentiated extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma
Net-02: a randomised, non-comparative, phase II trial of nal-IRI/5-FU or docetaxel as second-line therapy in patients with progressive poorly differentiated extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma

Background: the prognosis for patients with poorly-differentiated extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (PD-EP-NEC) is poor. A recognised first-line (1L) treatment for advanced disease is etoposide/platinum-based chemotherapy with no standard second-line (2L) treatment.

Methods: patients with histologically-confirmed PD-EP-NEC (Ki-67 > 20%; Grade 3) received IV liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) (70 mg/m2 free base)/5-FU (2400 mg/m2)/folinic acid, Q14 days (ARM A), or IV docetaxel (75 mg/m2), Q21 days (ARM B), as 2L therapy. Primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate (80% power to demonstrate one-sided 95% lower confidence interval excluded 15% (target level of efficacy: 30%)). Secondary endpoints: objective response rate (ORR), median PFS, overall survival (OS), toxicity and patient-reported quality-of-life (QoL) (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03837977).

Findings: of 58 patients (29 each arm); 57% male, 90% ECOG PS 0/1, 10% PS 2, 89.7% Ki-67 ≥ 55%, primary site: 70.7%-gastrointestinal, 18.9%-other, 10.3%-unknown, 91.4%/6.9%/1.7% were resistant/sensitive/intolerant to 1L platinum-based treatment, respectively. The primary end-point of 6-month PFS rate was met by ARM A: 29.6% (lower 95% Confidence-Limit (CL) 15.7), but not by ARM B: 13.8% (lower 95%CL:4.9). ORR, median PFS and OS were 11.1% (95%CI:2.4-29.2) and 10.3% (95%CI:2.2-27.4%); 3 months (95%CI:2-6) and 2 months (95%CI:2-2); and 6 months (95%CI:3-10) and 6 months (95%CI:3-9) in ARMS A and B, respectively. Adverse events ≥ grade 3 occurred in 51.7% and 55.2% (1 and 6 discontinuations due to toxicity in ARMS A and B), respectively. QoL was maintained in ARM A, but not ARM B.

Interpretation: nal-IRI/5-FU/folinic acid, but not docetaxel, met the primary endpoint, with manageable toxicity and maintained QoL, with no difference in OS. ORR and median PFS were similar in both arms. This study provides prospective efficacy, toxicity and QoL data in the 2L setting in a disease group of unmet need, and represents some of the strongest evidence available to recommend systemic treatment to these patients.

Funding: Servier.

2589-5370
McNamara, Mairéad G.
c3b9d2cc-ebef-47f7-a027-b8014f763f5e
Swain, Jayne
43ecfb57-bba3-4a26-b060-935d9d3ae516
Craig, Zoe
0be547b7-c1dc-4f32-bd10-645df0182399
Sharma, Rohini
6f68c54b-6585-4484-9f15-3a8d5add1572
Faluyi, Olusola
0883ca47-befe-493f-b562-0b65fed78dd2
Wadsley, Jonathan
2f0c2425-148d-4d38-9862-b641c683d9cc
Morgan, Carys
032457c3-5ad0-4e34-85fd-04d484fd0007
Wall, Lucy R.
89107c8c-b7c2-4c46-add7-5ec3f81dea8b
Chau, Ian
77e24001-6045-49ff-99c5-a49f708ba5da
Reed, Nick
ba0aeb8a-4ad9-4a8e-8390-c26ded1e9f96
Sarker, Debashis
1b3b1b23-092b-4f05-8fe5-7f9922e2d3e7
Margetts, Jane
069fc134-f7e1-46ee-9ccb-db1b653aecc0
Krell, Daniel
88395465-4dfc-4dab-a80c-ba3652be48f2
Cave, Judith
60c67e39-121a-49ca-8594-93e8e456464f
Sothi, Sharmila
385869b9-c4e1-44f8-84b7-ab6c044f4626
Anthoney, Alan
a9fdb3a0-aec6-45da-8532-3f73bd01b730
Bell, Christopher
44982df7-0746-4cdb-bed1-0bdfe68f1a64
Patel, Alkesh
ff6edcb3-00d4-424d-95a7-870459d369a1
Oughton, Jamie B.
2ed2390b-918c-4da3-b313-1878ec89f163
Cairns, David A.
8177d1d3-73de-44b2-a2f5-292eededa50d
Mansoor, Wasat
61e3b9be-8645-4e86-ba70-2dacf7af563e
Lamarca, Angela
283eb480-1dd5-4341-89ad-c36273322a6f
Hubner, Richard A.
aeaa2faf-1c3f-4bdc-aba2-ea9f217e19c3
Valle, Juan W.
2a6166b1-933c-4e35-8d12-0ccad8318c56
McNamara, Mairéad G.
c3b9d2cc-ebef-47f7-a027-b8014f763f5e
Swain, Jayne
43ecfb57-bba3-4a26-b060-935d9d3ae516
Craig, Zoe
0be547b7-c1dc-4f32-bd10-645df0182399
Sharma, Rohini
6f68c54b-6585-4484-9f15-3a8d5add1572
Faluyi, Olusola
0883ca47-befe-493f-b562-0b65fed78dd2
Wadsley, Jonathan
2f0c2425-148d-4d38-9862-b641c683d9cc
Morgan, Carys
032457c3-5ad0-4e34-85fd-04d484fd0007
Wall, Lucy R.
89107c8c-b7c2-4c46-add7-5ec3f81dea8b
Chau, Ian
77e24001-6045-49ff-99c5-a49f708ba5da
Reed, Nick
ba0aeb8a-4ad9-4a8e-8390-c26ded1e9f96
Sarker, Debashis
1b3b1b23-092b-4f05-8fe5-7f9922e2d3e7
Margetts, Jane
069fc134-f7e1-46ee-9ccb-db1b653aecc0
Krell, Daniel
88395465-4dfc-4dab-a80c-ba3652be48f2
Cave, Judith
60c67e39-121a-49ca-8594-93e8e456464f
Sothi, Sharmila
385869b9-c4e1-44f8-84b7-ab6c044f4626
Anthoney, Alan
a9fdb3a0-aec6-45da-8532-3f73bd01b730
Bell, Christopher
44982df7-0746-4cdb-bed1-0bdfe68f1a64
Patel, Alkesh
ff6edcb3-00d4-424d-95a7-870459d369a1
Oughton, Jamie B.
2ed2390b-918c-4da3-b313-1878ec89f163
Cairns, David A.
8177d1d3-73de-44b2-a2f5-292eededa50d
Mansoor, Wasat
61e3b9be-8645-4e86-ba70-2dacf7af563e
Lamarca, Angela
283eb480-1dd5-4341-89ad-c36273322a6f
Hubner, Richard A.
aeaa2faf-1c3f-4bdc-aba2-ea9f217e19c3
Valle, Juan W.
2a6166b1-933c-4e35-8d12-0ccad8318c56

McNamara, Mairéad G., Swain, Jayne, Craig, Zoe, Sharma, Rohini, Faluyi, Olusola, Wadsley, Jonathan, Morgan, Carys, Wall, Lucy R., Chau, Ian, Reed, Nick, Sarker, Debashis, Margetts, Jane, Krell, Daniel, Cave, Judith, Sothi, Sharmila, Anthoney, Alan, Bell, Christopher, Patel, Alkesh, Oughton, Jamie B., Cairns, David A., Mansoor, Wasat, Lamarca, Angela, Hubner, Richard A. and Valle, Juan W. (2023) Net-02: a randomised, non-comparative, phase II trial of nal-IRI/5-FU or docetaxel as second-line therapy in patients with progressive poorly differentiated extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma. EClinicalMedicine, 60, [102015]. (doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102015).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: the prognosis for patients with poorly-differentiated extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (PD-EP-NEC) is poor. A recognised first-line (1L) treatment for advanced disease is etoposide/platinum-based chemotherapy with no standard second-line (2L) treatment.

Methods: patients with histologically-confirmed PD-EP-NEC (Ki-67 > 20%; Grade 3) received IV liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) (70 mg/m2 free base)/5-FU (2400 mg/m2)/folinic acid, Q14 days (ARM A), or IV docetaxel (75 mg/m2), Q21 days (ARM B), as 2L therapy. Primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate (80% power to demonstrate one-sided 95% lower confidence interval excluded 15% (target level of efficacy: 30%)). Secondary endpoints: objective response rate (ORR), median PFS, overall survival (OS), toxicity and patient-reported quality-of-life (QoL) (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03837977).

Findings: of 58 patients (29 each arm); 57% male, 90% ECOG PS 0/1, 10% PS 2, 89.7% Ki-67 ≥ 55%, primary site: 70.7%-gastrointestinal, 18.9%-other, 10.3%-unknown, 91.4%/6.9%/1.7% were resistant/sensitive/intolerant to 1L platinum-based treatment, respectively. The primary end-point of 6-month PFS rate was met by ARM A: 29.6% (lower 95% Confidence-Limit (CL) 15.7), but not by ARM B: 13.8% (lower 95%CL:4.9). ORR, median PFS and OS were 11.1% (95%CI:2.4-29.2) and 10.3% (95%CI:2.2-27.4%); 3 months (95%CI:2-6) and 2 months (95%CI:2-2); and 6 months (95%CI:3-10) and 6 months (95%CI:3-9) in ARMS A and B, respectively. Adverse events ≥ grade 3 occurred in 51.7% and 55.2% (1 and 6 discontinuations due to toxicity in ARMS A and B), respectively. QoL was maintained in ARM A, but not ARM B.

Interpretation: nal-IRI/5-FU/folinic acid, but not docetaxel, met the primary endpoint, with manageable toxicity and maintained QoL, with no difference in OS. ORR and median PFS were similar in both arms. This study provides prospective efficacy, toxicity and QoL data in the 2L setting in a disease group of unmet need, and represents some of the strongest evidence available to recommend systemic treatment to these patients.

Funding: Servier.

Text
1-s2.0-S258953702300192X-main - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (899kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 8 May 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 2 June 2023
Published date: 2 June 2023

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 487551
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/487551
ISSN: 2589-5370
PURE UUID: dc211cca-7393-4650-b26d-f773509e5a5e
ORCID for Christopher Bell: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4601-1242

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 Feb 2024 17:36
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 07:40

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Mairéad G. McNamara
Author: Jayne Swain
Author: Zoe Craig
Author: Rohini Sharma
Author: Olusola Faluyi
Author: Jonathan Wadsley
Author: Carys Morgan
Author: Lucy R. Wall
Author: Ian Chau
Author: Nick Reed
Author: Debashis Sarker
Author: Jane Margetts
Author: Daniel Krell
Author: Judith Cave
Author: Sharmila Sothi
Author: Alan Anthoney
Author: Christopher Bell ORCID iD
Author: Alkesh Patel
Author: Jamie B. Oughton
Author: David A. Cairns
Author: Wasat Mansoor
Author: Angela Lamarca
Author: Richard A. Hubner
Author: Juan W. Valle

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×