The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Awareness and use of online appointment booking in general practice: analysis of GP Patient Survey data

Awareness and use of online appointment booking in general practice: analysis of GP Patient Survey data
Awareness and use of online appointment booking in general practice: analysis of GP Patient Survey data

Background: general practices are required to provide online booking to patients in line with policy to digitise access. However, uptake of online booking by patients is currently low and there is little evidence about awareness and use by different patient groups.

Aim: to examine variability in awareness and use of online appointment booking in general practice.

Method: secondary analysis of two questions from the GP Practice Survey data (2018) asking about awareness and use of online booking of appointments. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine associations with age, gender, ethnicity, deprivation, the presence of a long-term condition, long-term sickness and being deaf.

Results: in total, 43.3% (277 278/647 064) of responders reported being aware of being able to book appointments online, while only 15% (93 671/641 073) reported doing so. There was evidence of variation by all factors considered, with strong deprivation gradients in both awareness and use (for example, most versus least deprived quintile OR for use: 0.63 (95% CI = 0.61 to 0.65). There was a reduction in awareness and use in patients >75 years of age. Patients with long-term conditions were more aware and more likely to use online booking.

Conclusion: while over 40% of patients know that they can book appointment online, the number that actually do so is far lower. With the constant push for online services within the NHS and the roll out of the NHS app, practices should be aware that not all patient groups will book appointments online and that other routes of access need to be maintained to avoid widening health inequalities.

0960-1643
Gomez-Cano, Mayam
f0351400-7085-4f15-9482-044d2c46b77e
Atherton, Helen
9bb8932e-7bb7-4781-ab97-114613de99b1
Campbell, John
40fcc705-8391-4cde-bb69-266bbb7f23ed
Eccles, Abi
a4b3ae4d-5f92-405d-a8f1-b90ec4eb85cf
Dale, Jeremy
19fccbd2-1661-4d84-8a94-36bedb12a0e2
Poltawski, Leon
1bb9e733-6ba6-446d-a8e6-57d19af444c8
Abel, Gary
d14838f4-2a59-4dec-b3ac-527030888e44
Gomez-Cano, Mayam
f0351400-7085-4f15-9482-044d2c46b77e
Atherton, Helen
9bb8932e-7bb7-4781-ab97-114613de99b1
Campbell, John
40fcc705-8391-4cde-bb69-266bbb7f23ed
Eccles, Abi
a4b3ae4d-5f92-405d-a8f1-b90ec4eb85cf
Dale, Jeremy
19fccbd2-1661-4d84-8a94-36bedb12a0e2
Poltawski, Leon
1bb9e733-6ba6-446d-a8e6-57d19af444c8
Abel, Gary
d14838f4-2a59-4dec-b3ac-527030888e44

Gomez-Cano, Mayam, Atherton, Helen, Campbell, John, Eccles, Abi, Dale, Jeremy, Poltawski, Leon and Abel, Gary (2020) Awareness and use of online appointment booking in general practice: analysis of GP Patient Survey data. British Journal of General Practice, 70 (suppl 1). (doi:10.3399/bjgp20X711365).

Record type: Meeting abstract

Abstract

Background: general practices are required to provide online booking to patients in line with policy to digitise access. However, uptake of online booking by patients is currently low and there is little evidence about awareness and use by different patient groups.

Aim: to examine variability in awareness and use of online appointment booking in general practice.

Method: secondary analysis of two questions from the GP Practice Survey data (2018) asking about awareness and use of online booking of appointments. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine associations with age, gender, ethnicity, deprivation, the presence of a long-term condition, long-term sickness and being deaf.

Results: in total, 43.3% (277 278/647 064) of responders reported being aware of being able to book appointments online, while only 15% (93 671/641 073) reported doing so. There was evidence of variation by all factors considered, with strong deprivation gradients in both awareness and use (for example, most versus least deprived quintile OR for use: 0.63 (95% CI = 0.61 to 0.65). There was a reduction in awareness and use in patients >75 years of age. Patients with long-term conditions were more aware and more likely to use online booking.

Conclusion: while over 40% of patients know that they can book appointment online, the number that actually do so is far lower. With the constant push for online services within the NHS and the roll out of the NHS app, practices should be aware that not all patient groups will book appointments online and that other routes of access need to be maintained to avoid widening health inequalities.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: June 2020

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 487677
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/487677
ISSN: 0960-1643
PURE UUID: b6bcc734-73a3-4a4a-aa62-24edd029263d
ORCID for Helen Atherton: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7072-1925

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 Feb 2024 18:24
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:18

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Mayam Gomez-Cano
Author: Helen Atherton ORCID iD
Author: John Campbell
Author: Abi Eccles
Author: Jeremy Dale
Author: Leon Poltawski
Author: Gary Abel

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×