Unpacking the black box of non-opportunity for disadvantaged individuals
Unpacking the black box of non-opportunity for disadvantaged individuals
This paper theorizes the mechanisms responsible for the exclusion of disadvantaged individuals to two types of opportunities, namely the opportunity to act entrepreneurially and the opportunity to succeed. Exploring opportunity in its institutional and social context we concentrate on the cognitive-cultural level in order to identify the taken-for-granted beliefs that make the domain of “non- opportunity” possible for different types of disadvantaged groups. In an attempt to fathom the cultural mechanisms responsible for the unequal access to entrepreneurial opportunities we pay special attention to the less conscious processes that lead to the exclusion of certain individuals. The advantage of following this research orientation is twofold. First, it helps us appreciate that in order to more effectively integrate disadvantaged individuals in entrepreneurial processes we should start paying closer attention to the role of social stakeholders responsible for their marginalization. Second, it offers a remedy to false assumptions in mainstream entrepreneurship literature that entrepreneurial creativity and alertness (personality qualities and adequate resources alone) are alone sufficient for opportunity actualization. Failing to address the structural problems of entrepreneurial ecosystems may only hinder the prospects of inclusion; while imbalanced policy attempts may even further marginalize disadvantaged individuals by victimizing them for their limited success in entrepreneurial undertakings.
18461
Papadopoulou, Foteini
3b91f74e-3c74-4dd3-b85d-0404b1efc3be
9 July 2018
Papadopoulou, Foteini
3b91f74e-3c74-4dd3-b85d-0404b1efc3be
Papadopoulou, Foteini
(2018)
Unpacking the black box of non-opportunity for disadvantaged individuals.
Academy of Management Proceedings, 2018 (1), .
(doi:10.5465/AMBPP.2018.18461abstract).
Abstract
This paper theorizes the mechanisms responsible for the exclusion of disadvantaged individuals to two types of opportunities, namely the opportunity to act entrepreneurially and the opportunity to succeed. Exploring opportunity in its institutional and social context we concentrate on the cognitive-cultural level in order to identify the taken-for-granted beliefs that make the domain of “non- opportunity” possible for different types of disadvantaged groups. In an attempt to fathom the cultural mechanisms responsible for the unequal access to entrepreneurial opportunities we pay special attention to the less conscious processes that lead to the exclusion of certain individuals. The advantage of following this research orientation is twofold. First, it helps us appreciate that in order to more effectively integrate disadvantaged individuals in entrepreneurial processes we should start paying closer attention to the role of social stakeholders responsible for their marginalization. Second, it offers a remedy to false assumptions in mainstream entrepreneurship literature that entrepreneurial creativity and alertness (personality qualities and adequate resources alone) are alone sufficient for opportunity actualization. Failing to address the structural problems of entrepreneurial ecosystems may only hinder the prospects of inclusion; while imbalanced policy attempts may even further marginalize disadvantaged individuals by victimizing them for their limited success in entrepreneurial undertakings.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 9 July 2018
Published date: 9 July 2018
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 487814
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/487814
ISSN: 2151-6561
PURE UUID: 4be74479-ad0b-45d1-bc69-ec3328feda8d
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Mar 2024 18:35
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 07:52
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Foteini Papadopoulou
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics