The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The role of linguistic input in adult grammars: Modelling L1 morphosyntactic attrition

The role of linguistic input in adult grammars: Modelling L1 morphosyntactic attrition
The role of linguistic input in adult grammars: Modelling L1 morphosyntactic attrition
Theoretically modelling L1 grammatical attrition – defined in this thesis as the modification of fully acquired L1 grammatical representations due to a significant and prolonged change to a speaker’s linguistic input – remains a considerable research challenge. This thesis seeks to contribute to the modelling of L1 grammatical (specifically morphosyntactic) attrition by investigating the role of linguistic input in this process. To this end, it tests a recent and hitherto untested Minimalist model of grammatical attrition in which input plays a key role: The Attrition via Acquisition Model (Hicks and Domínguez, 2020a, 2020b). In the model, the possibility of attrition is determined by the availability of intake (defined as processed input) and the potential for Feature Reassembly (FR) of a previously acquired L1 structure. Two broad predictions are derived from the model’s assumptions and architecture. Firstly, attrition is in principle only possible for an L1 structure which has an analogous/equivalent L2 form which nonetheless differs in its behaviour due to differences in the respective L1–L2 functional feature specifications. Secondly, attrition is facilitated in linguistic environments in which the L2 is holistically more similar (i.e., in terms of morphosyntax, semantics, phonology, phonetics, and lexis) to the L1. To further develop the predictive power of the model, this thesis also formulates and tests the novel hypothesis that attrition is further facilitated for L1 structures which would need to undergo less complex FR to match a corresponding L2 structure due to greater overlap in the relevant L1–L2 feature specifications (in other words, this predicts that structural similarity at the level of individual morphosyntactic structures modulates the likelihood of attrition). Three groups of L1 German late-sequential bilingual speakers of either Dutch, English or Spanish are tested. These participants (n=85) have at least 15 years of residence, starting in adulthood, in either the Netherlands, UK or Spain. As well as a native German control group (n=44), this study also uses three further control groups consisting of native speakers of Dutch, English or Spanish (n=94). Two grammatical structures, which are argued to differ in the relative complexity of FR required for them to attrite in the L1, are investigated per L1–L2 pairing. Grammatical properties are tested by means of bimodal Acceptability Judgement Tasks (AJTs). There is a German and equivalent L2 version of each task. Potential attriters completed both an L1 and L2 version of the relevant AJTs. As such this is the first study to compare attrition of the same L1 under the influence of three holistically different L2 inputs and to investigate the role of FR complexity in attrition. This study also adds to the very small number of attrition studies which test potential attriters in their L2 as well as their L1 in order to further investigate the relationship between L2 acquisition and L1 attrition. Though results from a series of Culminative Link mixed effects models reveal no significant group-level attrition, attrition is found for a number of individual participants on five out of the six properties tested. Comparison of these individual results within and across the three L1–L2 groups does not suggest that either L1–L2 holistically similarity nor L1–L2 structural similarity – at least as formulated in this thesis – modulate the likelihood of grammatical attrition. The L2 acquisition results of these participants are very varied and indicate a rather complex relationship between L2 acquisition and L1 grammatical attrition. In light of these findings, some modifications to the Attrition via Acquisition model are proposed.
PhD thesis, L1 attrition, L2 acquisition, Multilingualism, Generative SLA
University of Southampton
Baker, Lewis
cb5cfccb-fe33-4b9a-b3fa-1804bc48dad4
Baker, Lewis
cb5cfccb-fe33-4b9a-b3fa-1804bc48dad4
Hicks, Glyn
1f3753b1-1224-4cd3-8af3-5bf708062831
Dominguez, Laura
9c1bf2b4-b582-429b-9e8a-5264c4b7e63f

Baker, Lewis (2024) The role of linguistic input in adult grammars: Modelling L1 morphosyntactic attrition. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 351pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Theoretically modelling L1 grammatical attrition – defined in this thesis as the modification of fully acquired L1 grammatical representations due to a significant and prolonged change to a speaker’s linguistic input – remains a considerable research challenge. This thesis seeks to contribute to the modelling of L1 grammatical (specifically morphosyntactic) attrition by investigating the role of linguistic input in this process. To this end, it tests a recent and hitherto untested Minimalist model of grammatical attrition in which input plays a key role: The Attrition via Acquisition Model (Hicks and Domínguez, 2020a, 2020b). In the model, the possibility of attrition is determined by the availability of intake (defined as processed input) and the potential for Feature Reassembly (FR) of a previously acquired L1 structure. Two broad predictions are derived from the model’s assumptions and architecture. Firstly, attrition is in principle only possible for an L1 structure which has an analogous/equivalent L2 form which nonetheless differs in its behaviour due to differences in the respective L1–L2 functional feature specifications. Secondly, attrition is facilitated in linguistic environments in which the L2 is holistically more similar (i.e., in terms of morphosyntax, semantics, phonology, phonetics, and lexis) to the L1. To further develop the predictive power of the model, this thesis also formulates and tests the novel hypothesis that attrition is further facilitated for L1 structures which would need to undergo less complex FR to match a corresponding L2 structure due to greater overlap in the relevant L1–L2 feature specifications (in other words, this predicts that structural similarity at the level of individual morphosyntactic structures modulates the likelihood of attrition). Three groups of L1 German late-sequential bilingual speakers of either Dutch, English or Spanish are tested. These participants (n=85) have at least 15 years of residence, starting in adulthood, in either the Netherlands, UK or Spain. As well as a native German control group (n=44), this study also uses three further control groups consisting of native speakers of Dutch, English or Spanish (n=94). Two grammatical structures, which are argued to differ in the relative complexity of FR required for them to attrite in the L1, are investigated per L1–L2 pairing. Grammatical properties are tested by means of bimodal Acceptability Judgement Tasks (AJTs). There is a German and equivalent L2 version of each task. Potential attriters completed both an L1 and L2 version of the relevant AJTs. As such this is the first study to compare attrition of the same L1 under the influence of three holistically different L2 inputs and to investigate the role of FR complexity in attrition. This study also adds to the very small number of attrition studies which test potential attriters in their L2 as well as their L1 in order to further investigate the relationship between L2 acquisition and L1 attrition. Though results from a series of Culminative Link mixed effects models reveal no significant group-level attrition, attrition is found for a number of individual participants on five out of the six properties tested. Comparison of these individual results within and across the three L1–L2 groups does not suggest that either L1–L2 holistically similarity nor L1–L2 structural similarity – at least as formulated in this thesis – modulate the likelihood of grammatical attrition. The L2 acquisition results of these participants are very varied and indicate a rather complex relationship between L2 acquisition and L1 grammatical attrition. In light of these findings, some modifications to the Attrition via Acquisition model are proposed.

Text
Lewis_Baker_PhD_thesis_pdfa - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (8MB)
Text
Final-thesis-submission-Examination-Mr-Lewis-Baker
Restricted to Repository staff only

More information

Submitted date: February 2024
Published date: March 2024
Keywords: PhD thesis, L1 attrition, L2 acquisition, Multilingualism, Generative SLA

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 487888
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/487888
PURE UUID: 4e6e0d00-1eae-41e0-89ac-4bc21052c2a7
ORCID for Lewis Baker: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8348-4677
ORCID for Glyn Hicks: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4126-8655
ORCID for Laura Dominguez: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2701-2469

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Mar 2024 17:48
Last modified: 17 Apr 2024 01:56

Export record

Contributors

Author: Lewis Baker ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Glyn Hicks ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Laura Dominguez ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×