The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Descriptive study of the challenges when implementing an app for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration to monitor their vision at home

Descriptive study of the challenges when implementing an app for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration to monitor their vision at home
Descriptive study of the challenges when implementing an app for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration to monitor their vision at home
Objectives: remote monitoring of health has the potential to reduce the burden to patients of face-to-face appointments and make health care more efficient. Apps are available for patients to self-monitor vision at home, e.g. to detect reactivation of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Describing the challenges when implementing apps for self-monitoring of vision at home was an objective of the MONARCH study to evaluate two vision-monitoring apps on an iPod Touch (Multibit and MyVisionTrack®).

Design: diagnostic test accuracy study.

Setting: six UK hospitals.

Methods: the study provides an example of the real-world implementation of such apps across health sectors in an older population. Challenges described include: (i) Frequency and reason for incoming calls made to a helpline and outgoing calls made to participants; (ii) Frequency and duration of events responsible for the tests being unavailable; (iii)Other technical and logistical challenges.

Results: patients (n=297) in the study were familiar with technology; 252/296 (85%) had internet at home and 197/296 (67%) had used a smartphone. Nevertheless, 141 (46%) called the study helpline, more often than anticipated. Of 435 reasons for calling, 393 (90%) related to testing with the apps or hardware, which contributed to reduced adherence. The team made at least one call to 131 patients (44%) to investigate why data had not been transmitted. Multibit and MyVisionTrack® apps were unavailable for 15 and 30 of 1318 testing days for reasons which were the responsibility of the app providers. Researchers also experienced technical challenges with a multiple device management system. Logistical challenges included regulations for transporting lithium-ion batteries and malfunctioning chargers.

Conclusions: implementation of similar technologies should incorporate a well-resourced helpline and build in additional training time for participants and troubleshooting time for staff. There should also be robust evidence that chosen technologies are fit for the intended purpose.
2044-6055
Reeves, B.C.
866ee67e-2615-4fe4-962c-33da6dda1163
Wickens, R.
c1014ef1-9016-4269-a045-38edbd259396
O'Connor, S.
ea986992-99f1-4bec-80a1-0edbf6942250
Gidman, E
b29d3fd6-8669-47ad-aef5-fbb9657631b0
Treanor, C.
cfd2eb9e-4ae3-4bb9-a4f4-f36b5f6fc5a7
Peto, T.
369ad5c4-56cb-4764-99d6-db3c255f0007
Burton, B.J.L.
e1c6ecb3-1aa7-485a-8ca9-736530fd9c19
Knox, P.
5238d5d0-bab8-43d2-b51c-eb2202968951
Lotery, A.
5ecc2d2d-d0b4-468f-ad2c-df7156f8e514
Sivaprasad, S.
451d388e-50f3-4cfb-b963-e73461eed920
Donnelly, M.
db9dd6e9-6430-4382-9281-957eeb8f8694
Rogers, C.
b4662239-62e2-44b6-8603-04ee45beb6d4
Hogg, R.E.
d74cbfaf-dc32-4bcf-bf16-5d7fb5ce8157
Reeves, B.C.
866ee67e-2615-4fe4-962c-33da6dda1163
Wickens, R.
c1014ef1-9016-4269-a045-38edbd259396
O'Connor, S.
ea986992-99f1-4bec-80a1-0edbf6942250
Gidman, E
b29d3fd6-8669-47ad-aef5-fbb9657631b0
Treanor, C.
cfd2eb9e-4ae3-4bb9-a4f4-f36b5f6fc5a7
Peto, T.
369ad5c4-56cb-4764-99d6-db3c255f0007
Burton, B.J.L.
e1c6ecb3-1aa7-485a-8ca9-736530fd9c19
Knox, P.
5238d5d0-bab8-43d2-b51c-eb2202968951
Lotery, A.
5ecc2d2d-d0b4-468f-ad2c-df7156f8e514
Sivaprasad, S.
451d388e-50f3-4cfb-b963-e73461eed920
Donnelly, M.
db9dd6e9-6430-4382-9281-957eeb8f8694
Rogers, C.
b4662239-62e2-44b6-8603-04ee45beb6d4
Hogg, R.E.
d74cbfaf-dc32-4bcf-bf16-5d7fb5ce8157

Reeves, B.C., Wickens, R., O'Connor, S., Gidman, E, Treanor, C., Peto, T., Burton, B.J.L., Knox, P., Lotery, A., Sivaprasad, S., Donnelly, M., Rogers, C. and Hogg, R.E. (2024) Descriptive study of the challenges when implementing an app for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration to monitor their vision at home. BMJ Open.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives: remote monitoring of health has the potential to reduce the burden to patients of face-to-face appointments and make health care more efficient. Apps are available for patients to self-monitor vision at home, e.g. to detect reactivation of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Describing the challenges when implementing apps for self-monitoring of vision at home was an objective of the MONARCH study to evaluate two vision-monitoring apps on an iPod Touch (Multibit and MyVisionTrack®).

Design: diagnostic test accuracy study.

Setting: six UK hospitals.

Methods: the study provides an example of the real-world implementation of such apps across health sectors in an older population. Challenges described include: (i) Frequency and reason for incoming calls made to a helpline and outgoing calls made to participants; (ii) Frequency and duration of events responsible for the tests being unavailable; (iii)Other technical and logistical challenges.

Results: patients (n=297) in the study were familiar with technology; 252/296 (85%) had internet at home and 197/296 (67%) had used a smartphone. Nevertheless, 141 (46%) called the study helpline, more often than anticipated. Of 435 reasons for calling, 393 (90%) related to testing with the apps or hardware, which contributed to reduced adherence. The team made at least one call to 131 patients (44%) to investigate why data had not been transmitted. Multibit and MyVisionTrack® apps were unavailable for 15 and 30 of 1318 testing days for reasons which were the responsibility of the app providers. Researchers also experienced technical challenges with a multiple device management system. Logistical challenges included regulations for transporting lithium-ion batteries and malfunctioning chargers.

Conclusions: implementation of similar technologies should incorporate a well-resourced helpline and build in additional training time for participants and troubleshooting time for staff. There should also be robust evidence that chosen technologies are fit for the intended purpose.

Text
MONARCH_ChallengesPaper_BMJOpen_revision1_accepted - Author's Original
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

In preparation date: 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 487890
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/487890
ISSN: 2044-6055
PURE UUID: ec1ced0a-f859-45d3-9aef-80654502acc8
ORCID for A. Lotery: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5541-4305

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Mar 2024 17:50
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 02:57

Export record

Contributors

Author: B.C. Reeves
Author: R. Wickens
Author: S. O'Connor
Author: E Gidman
Author: C. Treanor
Author: T. Peto
Author: B.J.L. Burton
Author: P. Knox
Author: A. Lotery ORCID iD
Author: S. Sivaprasad
Author: M. Donnelly
Author: C. Rogers
Author: R.E. Hogg

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×