The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Segmenting degenerated lumbar intervertebral discs from MR images

Segmenting degenerated lumbar intervertebral discs from MR images
Segmenting degenerated lumbar intervertebral discs from MR images
Magnetic Resonance Imaging is the modality of reference for diagnosing intervertebral disc degeneration, a condition related to chronic back pain. Segmentation of intervertebral discs is a prerequisite for computer aided diagnosis, while it could also serve in computer based surgery planning. A small number of studies report on disc segmentation methods applied on normal discs, while segmentation of degenerated discs remains an open issue. In the present study, a testing sample of 26 normal and 49 degenerated discs from T2-weighted midsaggital MR images of the lumbar spine was utilized to investigate the performance of two different segmentation methods. The first, which is based on the Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) algorithm utilizing three tissue classes (disc, bone and cerebrospinal fluid), suffered from severe leakage of disc border due to overlapping grey-level values between disc and surrounding tissues. To overcome this problem a combined method was developed, utilizing a probabilistic atlas of the disc along with the FCM algorithm. The probabilistic atlas was designed on the basis of an additional sample of 40 manually segmented normal intervertebral discs and was rigidly registered to images of the testing sample by means of a landmark based registration technique. The combined method resulted in reducing border leakage and achieved statistically significantly improved performance in comparison to the FCM method for all metrics tested (p«O.Ol). Specifically, sample overlap accuracies (mean standard deviation) of the combined method were O.81±O.06 for normal and O.77±O.07 for degenerated discs, and of the FCM method O.059±O.19 and O.63±O.15 respectively. Sample root mean square border distances of the combined method were J.53 and J.91 pixels for normal and degenerated discs. Concluding, incorporation of prior anatomical knowledge to the FCM method resulted in significantly nhanced performance, demonstrating increased potential in degenerated disc segmentation. © 2008 IEEE.
1082-3654
4536-4539
IEEE
Michopoulou, Sofia
f21ba2a3-f5d3-4998-801f-1ae72ff5d92c
Costaridou, Lena
d7f3b300-4dd1-4d0a-9a19-e90022d09ddb
Panagiotopoulos, Elias
91f90d97-2047-4fd2-9e29-2346da1982e8
Speller, Robert
b96a795b-be49-451d-b873-f642a5c9eb61
Todd-Pokropek, Andrew
309d666b-7b34-4a79-ac94-653bc71c0099
Michopoulou, Sofia
f21ba2a3-f5d3-4998-801f-1ae72ff5d92c
Costaridou, Lena
d7f3b300-4dd1-4d0a-9a19-e90022d09ddb
Panagiotopoulos, Elias
91f90d97-2047-4fd2-9e29-2346da1982e8
Speller, Robert
b96a795b-be49-451d-b873-f642a5c9eb61
Todd-Pokropek, Andrew
309d666b-7b34-4a79-ac94-653bc71c0099

Michopoulou, Sofia, Costaridou, Lena, Panagiotopoulos, Elias, Speller, Robert and Todd-Pokropek, Andrew (2009) Segmenting degenerated lumbar intervertebral discs from MR images. In, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. (IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record) IEEE, pp. 4536-4539. (doi:10.1109/NSSMIC.2008.4774298).

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

Magnetic Resonance Imaging is the modality of reference for diagnosing intervertebral disc degeneration, a condition related to chronic back pain. Segmentation of intervertebral discs is a prerequisite for computer aided diagnosis, while it could also serve in computer based surgery planning. A small number of studies report on disc segmentation methods applied on normal discs, while segmentation of degenerated discs remains an open issue. In the present study, a testing sample of 26 normal and 49 degenerated discs from T2-weighted midsaggital MR images of the lumbar spine was utilized to investigate the performance of two different segmentation methods. The first, which is based on the Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) algorithm utilizing three tissue classes (disc, bone and cerebrospinal fluid), suffered from severe leakage of disc border due to overlapping grey-level values between disc and surrounding tissues. To overcome this problem a combined method was developed, utilizing a probabilistic atlas of the disc along with the FCM algorithm. The probabilistic atlas was designed on the basis of an additional sample of 40 manually segmented normal intervertebral discs and was rigidly registered to images of the testing sample by means of a landmark based registration technique. The combined method resulted in reducing border leakage and achieved statistically significantly improved performance in comparison to the FCM method for all metrics tested (p«O.Ol). Specifically, sample overlap accuracies (mean standard deviation) of the combined method were O.81±O.06 for normal and O.77±O.07 for degenerated discs, and of the FCM method O.059±O.19 and O.63±O.15 respectively. Sample root mean square border distances of the combined method were J.53 and J.91 pixels for normal and degenerated discs. Concluding, incorporation of prior anatomical knowledge to the FCM method resulted in significantly nhanced performance, demonstrating increased potential in degenerated disc segmentation. © 2008 IEEE.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 6 February 2009

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 487891
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/487891
ISSN: 1082-3654
PURE UUID: bf3aadf2-4d65-454b-b73d-6573075da178

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Mar 2024 17:50
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 07:57

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sofia Michopoulou
Author: Lena Costaridou
Author: Elias Panagiotopoulos
Author: Robert Speller
Author: Andrew Todd-Pokropek

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×