The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The impact of fusion on adjacent levels in cervical spine injuries: Is it really important?

The impact of fusion on adjacent levels in cervical spine injuries: Is it really important?
The impact of fusion on adjacent levels in cervical spine injuries: Is it really important?
Objective: although the literature on degenerative disease of the cervical spine contains numerous articles studying the changes on levels adjacent to a fusion, there exist very few such studies concerning cervical spine stabilization for trauma.

Methods: over a 16-year period (1989-2005), one hundred and twelve patients underwent stabilization of the lower cervical spine (C3-T1) for subaxial cervical spine injuries, either with an anterior or posterior procedure, or both. Eighty-one patients with adequate follow-up were included in the study and 3 groups were identified: Group A, consisting of 8 patients who underwent anterior stabilization and developed Adjacent Level Ossification Development (ALOD), Group B, comprising 53 patients who were anteriorly plated but who did not develop ALOD and Group C, comprising 20 patients who received posterior stabilization.

Results: eight out of 61 patients (13.1%) who were anteriorly operated developed ALOD in 11 adjacent levels (Group A). Severe (grade 3) ossification was noted in 6/8 patients at the cranial adjacent level, and in 2/8 patients at the caudal one. Three out of 8 patients presented with early ALOD at 3, 4 and 18 months respectively. Despite the radiographic abnormalities showing ossification, all the patients had an uncomplicated course without symptoms. All the radiographs of Group B and Group C patients demonstrated grade 0 ossification for both the cranial and caudal adjacent levels.

Conclusion: adjacent-level ossification in cervical spine injuries may appear very early in the postoperative period and it can have a different course than in the degenerative disc disease population, at least in some patients. The first cephalad level adjacent to a fusion appears to be at greater risk. However, even when ALOD is evident radiographically, it very rarely produces any symptoms. © 2009.
ADCF, Adjacent segment disease, Adjacent segment ossification, Cervical fusion, Cervical spine injury, Cervical spine stabilization
0303-8467
816-824
Kasimatis, Georgios B.
d362da17-584f-4d15-9b14-2a3615d4595a
Michopoulou, Sofia
f21ba2a3-f5d3-4998-801f-1ae72ff5d92c
Boniatis, Ioannis
25e64f9c-bb16-4561-b3ff-6d1296a3b842
Dimopoulos, Panagiotis
997bbf62-b384-4450-a881-db937d39ab40
Panayiotakis, Georgios
bf8f6516-09b7-4a6a-bd19-7ae903a2ea90
Panagiotopoulos, Elias
91f90d97-2047-4fd2-9e29-2346da1982e8
Kasimatis, Georgios B.
d362da17-584f-4d15-9b14-2a3615d4595a
Michopoulou, Sofia
f21ba2a3-f5d3-4998-801f-1ae72ff5d92c
Boniatis, Ioannis
25e64f9c-bb16-4561-b3ff-6d1296a3b842
Dimopoulos, Panagiotis
997bbf62-b384-4450-a881-db937d39ab40
Panayiotakis, Georgios
bf8f6516-09b7-4a6a-bd19-7ae903a2ea90
Panagiotopoulos, Elias
91f90d97-2047-4fd2-9e29-2346da1982e8

Kasimatis, Georgios B., Michopoulou, Sofia, Boniatis, Ioannis, Dimopoulos, Panagiotis, Panayiotakis, Georgios and Panagiotopoulos, Elias (2009) The impact of fusion on adjacent levels in cervical spine injuries: Is it really important? Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 111 (10), 816-824. (doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2009.08.028).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: although the literature on degenerative disease of the cervical spine contains numerous articles studying the changes on levels adjacent to a fusion, there exist very few such studies concerning cervical spine stabilization for trauma.

Methods: over a 16-year period (1989-2005), one hundred and twelve patients underwent stabilization of the lower cervical spine (C3-T1) for subaxial cervical spine injuries, either with an anterior or posterior procedure, or both. Eighty-one patients with adequate follow-up were included in the study and 3 groups were identified: Group A, consisting of 8 patients who underwent anterior stabilization and developed Adjacent Level Ossification Development (ALOD), Group B, comprising 53 patients who were anteriorly plated but who did not develop ALOD and Group C, comprising 20 patients who received posterior stabilization.

Results: eight out of 61 patients (13.1%) who were anteriorly operated developed ALOD in 11 adjacent levels (Group A). Severe (grade 3) ossification was noted in 6/8 patients at the cranial adjacent level, and in 2/8 patients at the caudal one. Three out of 8 patients presented with early ALOD at 3, 4 and 18 months respectively. Despite the radiographic abnormalities showing ossification, all the patients had an uncomplicated course without symptoms. All the radiographs of Group B and Group C patients demonstrated grade 0 ossification for both the cranial and caudal adjacent levels.

Conclusion: adjacent-level ossification in cervical spine injuries may appear very early in the postoperative period and it can have a different course than in the degenerative disc disease population, at least in some patients. The first cephalad level adjacent to a fusion appears to be at greater risk. However, even when ALOD is evident radiographically, it very rarely produces any symptoms. © 2009.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 11 August 2009
e-pub ahead of print date: 21 October 2009
Keywords: ADCF, Adjacent segment disease, Adjacent segment ossification, Cervical fusion, Cervical spine injury, Cervical spine stabilization

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 487895
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/487895
ISSN: 0303-8467
PURE UUID: 8b7f8444-909a-4790-aba0-c07a538f175e

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Mar 2024 17:52
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 07:57

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Georgios B. Kasimatis
Author: Sofia Michopoulou
Author: Ioannis Boniatis
Author: Panagiotis Dimopoulos
Author: Georgios Panayiotakis
Author: Elias Panagiotopoulos

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×