The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Brain PET and SPECT imaging and quantification: a survey of the current status in the UK

Brain PET and SPECT imaging and quantification: a survey of the current status in the UK
Brain PET and SPECT imaging and quantification: a survey of the current status in the UK
Objectives: with disease-modifying therapies in development for neurological disorders, quantitative brain imaging techniques become increasingly relevant for objective early diagnosis and assessment of response to treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of Brain SPECT and PET scans in the UK and explore drivers and barriers to using quantitative analysis through an online survey.

Methods: a web-based survey with 27 questions was used to capture a snapshot of brain imaging in the UK. The survey included multiple-choice questions assessing the availability and use of quantification for DaTscan, Perfusion SPECT, FDG PET and Amyloid PET. The survey results were reviewed and interpreted by a panel of imaging experts.

Results: forty-six unique responses were collected and analysed, with 84% of responses from brain imaging sites. Within these sites, 88% perform DaTscan, 50% Perfusion SPECT, 48% FDG PET, and 33% Amyloid PET, while a few sites use other PET tracers. Quantitative Brain analysis is used in 86% of sites performing DaTscans, 40% for Perfusion SPECT, 63% for FDG PET and 42% for Amyloid PET. Commercial tools are used more frequently than in-house software.

Conclusion: the survey showed variations across the UK, with high availability of DaTscan imaging and quantification and lower availability of other SPECT and PET scans. The main drivers for quantification were improved reporting confidence and diagnostic accuracy, while the main barriers were a perception of a need for an appropriate database of healthy controls and a lack of training, time, and software availability.
PET, Parkinson disease, SPECT, brain, dementia, epilepsy, neuroimaging, quantification
1473-5628
834-842
Michopoulou, Sofia K.
f21ba2a3-f5d3-4998-801f-1ae72ff5d92c
Dickson, John C.
7dce62cc-70e1-4276-aa36-297eaafac2fb
Gardner, Glen G.
7a296a48-6ecd-433a-958a-a4d15e33da86
Gee, Thomas R.
d9f6b1e1-d7b7-4aca-aaa0-bfe087b4815b
Fenwick, Andrew J.
01f8c1af-ab03-4c6a-a53d-6616ddb639a5
Melhuish, Timothy
7b5e1eb0-1706-47e1-91a6-45970128107d
Monaghan, Clare A.
79ac5aaf-77f7-4593-a6de-4363ee06921a
O'Brien, Neil
2e05fb57-6800-4a98-b20a-f7775efd011e
Prosser, Angus M.J.
6e9ead88-79a0-4e9e-a836-5c6153e6c8d8
Scott, Catherine J.
db64ab70-8ca2-4e71-bb46-9bf11c87bac6
Staff, Roger T.
44a843c5-9fce-4888-82fc-861c5c981f89
Taylor, Jonathan
d052b869-1bbc-4cb0-bdec-192ea49608d1
Michopoulou, Sofia K.
f21ba2a3-f5d3-4998-801f-1ae72ff5d92c
Dickson, John C.
7dce62cc-70e1-4276-aa36-297eaafac2fb
Gardner, Glen G.
7a296a48-6ecd-433a-958a-a4d15e33da86
Gee, Thomas R.
d9f6b1e1-d7b7-4aca-aaa0-bfe087b4815b
Fenwick, Andrew J.
01f8c1af-ab03-4c6a-a53d-6616ddb639a5
Melhuish, Timothy
7b5e1eb0-1706-47e1-91a6-45970128107d
Monaghan, Clare A.
79ac5aaf-77f7-4593-a6de-4363ee06921a
O'Brien, Neil
2e05fb57-6800-4a98-b20a-f7775efd011e
Prosser, Angus M.J.
6e9ead88-79a0-4e9e-a836-5c6153e6c8d8
Scott, Catherine J.
db64ab70-8ca2-4e71-bb46-9bf11c87bac6
Staff, Roger T.
44a843c5-9fce-4888-82fc-861c5c981f89
Taylor, Jonathan
d052b869-1bbc-4cb0-bdec-192ea49608d1

Michopoulou, Sofia K., Dickson, John C., Gardner, Glen G., Gee, Thomas R., Fenwick, Andrew J., Melhuish, Timothy, Monaghan, Clare A., O'Brien, Neil, Prosser, Angus M.J., Scott, Catherine J., Staff, Roger T. and Taylor, Jonathan (2023) Brain PET and SPECT imaging and quantification: a survey of the current status in the UK. Nuclear Medicine Communications, 44 (10), 834-842. (doi:10.1097/MNM.0000000000001736).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives: with disease-modifying therapies in development for neurological disorders, quantitative brain imaging techniques become increasingly relevant for objective early diagnosis and assessment of response to treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of Brain SPECT and PET scans in the UK and explore drivers and barriers to using quantitative analysis through an online survey.

Methods: a web-based survey with 27 questions was used to capture a snapshot of brain imaging in the UK. The survey included multiple-choice questions assessing the availability and use of quantification for DaTscan, Perfusion SPECT, FDG PET and Amyloid PET. The survey results were reviewed and interpreted by a panel of imaging experts.

Results: forty-six unique responses were collected and analysed, with 84% of responses from brain imaging sites. Within these sites, 88% perform DaTscan, 50% Perfusion SPECT, 48% FDG PET, and 33% Amyloid PET, while a few sites use other PET tracers. Quantitative Brain analysis is used in 86% of sites performing DaTscans, 40% for Perfusion SPECT, 63% for FDG PET and 42% for Amyloid PET. Commercial tools are used more frequently than in-house software.

Conclusion: the survey showed variations across the UK, with high availability of DaTscan imaging and quantification and lower availability of other SPECT and PET scans. The main drivers for quantification were improved reporting confidence and diagnostic accuracy, while the main barriers were a perception of a need for an appropriate database of healthy controls and a lack of training, time, and software availability.

Text
brain_pet_and_spect_imaging_and_quantification__a.2 (1) - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (512kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 4 July 2023
Published date: October 2023
Keywords: PET, Parkinson disease, SPECT, brain, dementia, epilepsy, neuroimaging, quantification

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 487904
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/487904
ISSN: 1473-5628
PURE UUID: 53c5b03f-f5a1-4760-afd7-41747450f57e
ORCID for Angus M.J. Prosser: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2705-1222

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Mar 2024 18:02
Last modified: 25 Apr 2024 17:48

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sofia K. Michopoulou
Author: John C. Dickson
Author: Glen G. Gardner
Author: Thomas R. Gee
Author: Andrew J. Fenwick
Author: Timothy Melhuish
Author: Clare A. Monaghan
Author: Neil O'Brien
Author: Angus M.J. Prosser ORCID iD
Author: Catherine J. Scott
Author: Roger T. Staff
Author: Jonathan Taylor

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×