Painful knee prosthesis
Painful knee prosthesis
Objectives: the aim of the study was to evaluate the value of single-photon emission computerized tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) in the clinical assessment of painful knee prostheses.
Materials and methods: between 2009 and 2011 we identified 105 patients who had undergone 99mTc-hydroxydiphosphonate SPECT/CT for painful knee prosthesis. Complete follow-up data were available for 69 patients (50 women and 19 men; mean age, 71 years) with painful knee prostheses (59 total, nine unicompartmental, one patellofemoral) and clinical suspicion of infection or loosening. The imaging test report in conjunction with the clinical data from the patient’s notes was used to gauge how useful the test had been in terms of patient management.
Results: SPECT/CT confirmed the suspected clinical diagnosis of loosening in nine patients (13%) and of infection in two (2.9%) and identified other causes in 43 patients (62.3%). In 85.5% of patients, SPECT/CT was clinically useful (both positive and negative results), whereas in 14.5% it had no clinical impact on patient management. Revision surgery was performed in 24/69 (34.8%) patients and confirmed the SPECT/CT diagnosis in 21 patients (seven loosening, one infection, two subchondral fractures, two postoperative inflammation and nine patellofemoral osteoarthritis).
Conclusion: SPECT/CT is a useful tool for the evaluation of painful knee prosthesis in 85.5% of cases and helps in confirming mechanical loosening and in excluding other causes such as infection and patellofemoral osteoarthritis.
182-188
Al-Nabhani, Khalsa
33e2230d-cccf-44a2-ae73-7daf059a1869
Michopoulou, Sofia
f21ba2a3-f5d3-4998-801f-1ae72ff5d92c
Allie, Rayjanah
733afb49-a146-4be8-8db4-8cb5c4a8378c
Alkalbani, Jokha
934dd664-dcc8-40db-a35b-9b8178bbe406
Saad, Ziauddin
03b3a8cf-1290-471b-9b90-c223016a5880
Sajjan, Rakesh
ea06d709-3861-457b-b83d-956c7ca4cb07
Syed, Rizwan
d46610d1-e53b-4fb9-adb9-33a8d73180fc
Bomanji, Jamshed
a4d24e12-f465-4529-a401-4a60468af67c
February 2014
Al-Nabhani, Khalsa
33e2230d-cccf-44a2-ae73-7daf059a1869
Michopoulou, Sofia
f21ba2a3-f5d3-4998-801f-1ae72ff5d92c
Allie, Rayjanah
733afb49-a146-4be8-8db4-8cb5c4a8378c
Alkalbani, Jokha
934dd664-dcc8-40db-a35b-9b8178bbe406
Saad, Ziauddin
03b3a8cf-1290-471b-9b90-c223016a5880
Sajjan, Rakesh
ea06d709-3861-457b-b83d-956c7ca4cb07
Syed, Rizwan
d46610d1-e53b-4fb9-adb9-33a8d73180fc
Bomanji, Jamshed
a4d24e12-f465-4529-a401-4a60468af67c
Al-Nabhani, Khalsa, Michopoulou, Sofia, Allie, Rayjanah, Alkalbani, Jokha, Saad, Ziauddin, Sajjan, Rakesh, Syed, Rizwan and Bomanji, Jamshed
(2014)
Painful knee prosthesis.
Nuclear Medicine Communications, 35 (2), .
(doi:10.1097/mnm.0000000000000028).
Abstract
Objectives: the aim of the study was to evaluate the value of single-photon emission computerized tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) in the clinical assessment of painful knee prostheses.
Materials and methods: between 2009 and 2011 we identified 105 patients who had undergone 99mTc-hydroxydiphosphonate SPECT/CT for painful knee prosthesis. Complete follow-up data were available for 69 patients (50 women and 19 men; mean age, 71 years) with painful knee prostheses (59 total, nine unicompartmental, one patellofemoral) and clinical suspicion of infection or loosening. The imaging test report in conjunction with the clinical data from the patient’s notes was used to gauge how useful the test had been in terms of patient management.
Results: SPECT/CT confirmed the suspected clinical diagnosis of loosening in nine patients (13%) and of infection in two (2.9%) and identified other causes in 43 patients (62.3%). In 85.5% of patients, SPECT/CT was clinically useful (both positive and negative results), whereas in 14.5% it had no clinical impact on patient management. Revision surgery was performed in 24/69 (34.8%) patients and confirmed the SPECT/CT diagnosis in 21 patients (seven loosening, one infection, two subchondral fractures, two postoperative inflammation and nine patellofemoral osteoarthritis).
Conclusion: SPECT/CT is a useful tool for the evaluation of painful knee prosthesis in 85.5% of cases and helps in confirming mechanical loosening and in excluding other causes such as infection and patellofemoral osteoarthritis.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 29 September 2013
Published date: February 2014
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 487905
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/487905
ISSN: 0143-3636
PURE UUID: a1cb0f5c-fd99-43ac-9e9c-e2e2e73b87ad
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 08 Mar 2024 18:03
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 07:57
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Khalsa Al-Nabhani
Author:
Sofia Michopoulou
Author:
Rayjanah Allie
Author:
Jokha Alkalbani
Author:
Ziauddin Saad
Author:
Rakesh Sajjan
Author:
Rizwan Syed
Author:
Jamshed Bomanji
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics