The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Discovery molecular imaging digital ready PET/CT performance evaluation according to the NEMA NU2-2012 standard

Discovery molecular imaging digital ready PET/CT performance evaluation according to the NEMA NU2-2012 standard
Discovery molecular imaging digital ready PET/CT performance evaluation according to the NEMA NU2-2012 standard
Objectives: the aim of this study was to evaluate and benchmark the performance characteristics of the General Electric (GE) Discovery Molecular Imaging (MI) Digital Ready (DR) PET/CT.

Materials and methods: performance evaluation against the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) 2012 standard was performed on three GE Discovery MI DR PET/CT systems installed across different UK centres. The Discovery MI DR performance was compared with the Siemens Biograph mCT Flow, Phillips Ingenuity TF and GE Discovery 690 fully analogue PET/CT systems. In addition, as the Discovery MI DR is upgradable to the Digital MI with silicon photomultipliers, performance characteristics between analogue and digital were compared with assess potential benefits of a system upgrade.

Results: the average NEMA results across three Discovery MI DR scanners were: sensitivity 7.3 cps/kBq, spatial resolution full-width-half-maximum radial 5.5 mm, tangential 4.5 mm and axial 6 mm at 10 cm from the centre of the field-of-view, peak noise equivalent count rate 142 kcps, scatter fraction 37.1%, contrast recovery coefficients from the International Electrotechnical Commission phantom ranged from 52 to 87% for 10-37-mm diameter spheres.

Conclusion: all three Discovery MI DR systems tested in this study exceeded the manufacturer's NEMA specification, yet variability between scanners was noted. Discovery MI DR showed similar performance to Discovery 690 and Ingenuity TF, but lower sensitivity and spatial resolution than Biograph mCT Flow. The Discovery MI DR showed lower spatial resolution and contrast recovery than the 20-cm field-of-view Digital MI.
acceptance testing, equipment upgrade, performance benchmark, quality control, scanner comparison
1473-5628
270-277
Michopoulou, Sofia
f21ba2a3-f5d3-4998-801f-1ae72ff5d92c
O'Shaughnessy, Emma
c000566a-21cd-467c-b0dc-fdbcf2512b56
Thomson, Katharine
48234cec-dcd2-4079-bfdb-e261e512e00a
Guy, Matthew J.
1a40b2ed-3aec-4fce-9954-396840471c28
Michopoulou, Sofia
f21ba2a3-f5d3-4998-801f-1ae72ff5d92c
O'Shaughnessy, Emma
c000566a-21cd-467c-b0dc-fdbcf2512b56
Thomson, Katharine
48234cec-dcd2-4079-bfdb-e261e512e00a
Guy, Matthew J.
1a40b2ed-3aec-4fce-9954-396840471c28

Michopoulou, Sofia, O'Shaughnessy, Emma, Thomson, Katharine and Guy, Matthew J. (2019) Discovery molecular imaging digital ready PET/CT performance evaluation according to the NEMA NU2-2012 standard. Nuclear Medicine Communications, 40 (3), 270-277. (doi:10.1097/MNM.0000000000000962).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives: the aim of this study was to evaluate and benchmark the performance characteristics of the General Electric (GE) Discovery Molecular Imaging (MI) Digital Ready (DR) PET/CT.

Materials and methods: performance evaluation against the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) 2012 standard was performed on three GE Discovery MI DR PET/CT systems installed across different UK centres. The Discovery MI DR performance was compared with the Siemens Biograph mCT Flow, Phillips Ingenuity TF and GE Discovery 690 fully analogue PET/CT systems. In addition, as the Discovery MI DR is upgradable to the Digital MI with silicon photomultipliers, performance characteristics between analogue and digital were compared with assess potential benefits of a system upgrade.

Results: the average NEMA results across three Discovery MI DR scanners were: sensitivity 7.3 cps/kBq, spatial resolution full-width-half-maximum radial 5.5 mm, tangential 4.5 mm and axial 6 mm at 10 cm from the centre of the field-of-view, peak noise equivalent count rate 142 kcps, scatter fraction 37.1%, contrast recovery coefficients from the International Electrotechnical Commission phantom ranged from 52 to 87% for 10-37-mm diameter spheres.

Conclusion: all three Discovery MI DR systems tested in this study exceeded the manufacturer's NEMA specification, yet variability between scanners was noted. Discovery MI DR showed similar performance to Discovery 690 and Ingenuity TF, but lower sensitivity and spatial resolution than Biograph mCT Flow. The Discovery MI DR showed lower spatial resolution and contrast recovery than the 20-cm field-of-view Digital MI.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 12 November 2018
Published date: March 2019
Keywords: acceptance testing, equipment upgrade, performance benchmark, quality control, scanner comparison

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 487906
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/487906
ISSN: 1473-5628
PURE UUID: 1291b585-3547-43f9-83a5-e917c76c1358
ORCID for Matthew J. Guy: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6818-2010

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Mar 2024 18:04
Last modified: 21 Sep 2024 02:15

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sofia Michopoulou
Author: Emma O'Shaughnessy
Author: Katharine Thomson
Author: Matthew J. Guy ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×