The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A high throughput immuno-affinity mass spectrometry method for detection and quantitation of SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein in human saliva and its comparison with RT-PCR, RT-LAMP, and lateral flow rapid antigen test

A high throughput immuno-affinity mass spectrometry method for detection and quantitation of SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein in human saliva and its comparison with RT-PCR, RT-LAMP, and lateral flow rapid antigen test
A high throughput immuno-affinity mass spectrometry method for detection and quantitation of SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein in human saliva and its comparison with RT-PCR, RT-LAMP, and lateral flow rapid antigen test

Objectives: many reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) methods exist that can detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA in different matrices. RT-PCR is highly sensitive, although viral RNA may be detected long after active infection has taken place. SARS-CoV-2 proteins have shorter detection windows hence their detection might be more meaningful. Given salivary droplets represent a main source of transmission, we explored the detection of viral RNA and protein using four different detection platforms including SISCAPA peptide immunoaffinity liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (SISCAPA-LC-MS) using polyclonal capture antibodies.

Methods: the SISCAPA-LC MS method was compared to RT-PCR, RT-loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP), and a lateral flow rapid antigen test (RAT) for the detection of virus material in the drool saliva of 102 patients hospitalised after infection with SARS-CoV-2. Cycle thresholds (Ct) of RT-PCR ( E gene) were compared to RT-LAMP time-to-positive (TTP) ( NE and Orf1a genes), RAT optical densitometry measurements (test line/control line ratio) and to SISCAPA-LC-MS for measurements of viral protein.

Results: SISCAPA-LC-MS showed low sensitivity (37.7 %) but high specificity (89.8 %). RAT showed lower sensitivity (24.5 %) and high specificity (100 %). RT-LAMP had high sensitivity (83.0 %) and specificity (100.0 %). At high initial viral RNA loads (<20 Ct), results obtained using SISCAPA-LC-MS correlated with RT-PCR (R 2 0.57, p-value 0.002).

Conclusions: detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein in saliva was less frequent than the detection of viral RNA. The SISCAPA-LC-MS method allowed processing of multiple samples in <150 min and was scalable, enabling high throughput.

immuno-affinity, mass spectrometry, rapid antigen test, RT-LAMP, RT-PCR, SARS-CoV-2
1434-6621
Lane, Dan
63c76b9b-3fc0-49a5-a066-8a07a33fe214
Allsopp, Rebecca
450376b2-75af-445b-879e-afd8072f519f
Holmes, Christopher W.
63e0b32f-df81-4174-819b-c361fcdf7cce
Skipp, Paul
1ba7dcf6-9fe7-4b5c-a9d0-e32ed7f42aa5
et al.
Lane, Dan
63c76b9b-3fc0-49a5-a066-8a07a33fe214
Allsopp, Rebecca
450376b2-75af-445b-879e-afd8072f519f
Holmes, Christopher W.
63e0b32f-df81-4174-819b-c361fcdf7cce
Skipp, Paul
1ba7dcf6-9fe7-4b5c-a9d0-e32ed7f42aa5

Lane, Dan, Allsopp, Rebecca and Holmes, Christopher W. , et al. (2024) A high throughput immuno-affinity mass spectrometry method for detection and quantitation of SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein in human saliva and its comparison with RT-PCR, RT-LAMP, and lateral flow rapid antigen test. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. (doi:10.1515/cclm-2023-0243).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives: many reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) methods exist that can detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA in different matrices. RT-PCR is highly sensitive, although viral RNA may be detected long after active infection has taken place. SARS-CoV-2 proteins have shorter detection windows hence their detection might be more meaningful. Given salivary droplets represent a main source of transmission, we explored the detection of viral RNA and protein using four different detection platforms including SISCAPA peptide immunoaffinity liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (SISCAPA-LC-MS) using polyclonal capture antibodies.

Methods: the SISCAPA-LC MS method was compared to RT-PCR, RT-loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP), and a lateral flow rapid antigen test (RAT) for the detection of virus material in the drool saliva of 102 patients hospitalised after infection with SARS-CoV-2. Cycle thresholds (Ct) of RT-PCR ( E gene) were compared to RT-LAMP time-to-positive (TTP) ( NE and Orf1a genes), RAT optical densitometry measurements (test line/control line ratio) and to SISCAPA-LC-MS for measurements of viral protein.

Results: SISCAPA-LC-MS showed low sensitivity (37.7 %) but high specificity (89.8 %). RAT showed lower sensitivity (24.5 %) and high specificity (100 %). RT-LAMP had high sensitivity (83.0 %) and specificity (100.0 %). At high initial viral RNA loads (<20 Ct), results obtained using SISCAPA-LC-MS correlated with RT-PCR (R 2 0.57, p-value 0.002).

Conclusions: detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein in saliva was less frequent than the detection of viral RNA. The SISCAPA-LC-MS method allowed processing of multiple samples in <150 min and was scalable, enabling high throughput.

Text
A high throughput immuno-affinity mass spectrometry method for detection and quantitation of SARS-CoV-2 - accepted - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (195kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 12 December 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 23 January 2024
Additional Information: Funding Information: This research was funded by the UK Medical Research Council Confidence in Concept (MRC CiC) Funding (Grant Number: MC_PC_18054). We acknowledge the support of the NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre and the John and Lucille van Geest Foundation.
Keywords: immuno-affinity, mass spectrometry, rapid antigen test, RT-LAMP, RT-PCR, SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 487958
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/487958
ISSN: 1434-6621
PURE UUID: 89faf02f-408c-43fa-8b57-cacaed550f91
ORCID for Paul Skipp: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2995-2959

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Mar 2024 17:49
Last modified: 01 May 2024 01:34

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Dan Lane
Author: Rebecca Allsopp
Author: Christopher W. Holmes
Author: Paul Skipp ORCID iD
Corporate Author: et al.

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×