Adopting a reductionist approach to advance acoustic deterrents in fish conservation
Adopting a reductionist approach to advance acoustic deterrents in fish conservation
Introduction: deterrents that use acoustics to guide fish away from dangerous areas (e.g., water intakes) depend on the elicitation of avoidance in the target species. Background noise is often neglected when testing acoustic deterrents, but it is important to account for its effects as freshwater environments present a wide variety of ambient soundscapes.
Methods: using the widely studied goldfish (Carassius auratus) as a suitable experimental model, this study adopted a reductionist approach to investigate the relationship between the startle response to a pure tone signal and background noise. Under laboratory conditions, the startle responses of individual goldfish exposed to 120 ms tones at 250 Hz and four Sound Pressure Levels (SPLs: 115, 125, 135, 145 dB re 1 μPa) were quantified in the presence (treatment) and absence (ambient - control) of band-limited random noise (105 dB re 1 μPa).
Results and discussion: when observing the dose-response relationship, the proportion of fish that startled to the signal increased with SPL in both the treatment and control, although there was no difference between them, suggesting that the signal-to-noise ratio was not influential under the conditions tested. However, further analysis using Signal Detection Theory indicated that the was higher in the noisy treatment than the control when responding to both false alarms (startle during a pre-signal period) and hits (startle to an external stimulus during the pre-signal period). Furthermore, fish were better able to discriminate (d?) external stimuli over time (during the pre-signal period) in the treatment than control. There is a need to consider the role of background noise when designing acoustic fish deterrents that depend on the exhibition of avoidance behaviors.
1-11
Holgate, Amelia
cb827aab-f36f-473c-b421-f640645d8531
White, Paul
2dd2477b-5aa9-42e2-9d19-0806d994eaba
Leighton, Timothy
3e5262ce-1d7d-42eb-b013-fcc5c286bbae
Kemp, Paul
9e33fba6-cccf-4eb5-965b-b70e72b11cd7
7 March 2024
Holgate, Amelia
cb827aab-f36f-473c-b421-f640645d8531
White, Paul
2dd2477b-5aa9-42e2-9d19-0806d994eaba
Leighton, Timothy
3e5262ce-1d7d-42eb-b013-fcc5c286bbae
Kemp, Paul
9e33fba6-cccf-4eb5-965b-b70e72b11cd7
Holgate, Amelia, White, Paul, Leighton, Timothy and Kemp, Paul
(2024)
Adopting a reductionist approach to advance acoustic deterrents in fish conservation.
Frontiers in Freshwater Science, 2, , [1320582].
(doi:10.3389/ffwsc.2024.1320582).
Abstract
Introduction: deterrents that use acoustics to guide fish away from dangerous areas (e.g., water intakes) depend on the elicitation of avoidance in the target species. Background noise is often neglected when testing acoustic deterrents, but it is important to account for its effects as freshwater environments present a wide variety of ambient soundscapes.
Methods: using the widely studied goldfish (Carassius auratus) as a suitable experimental model, this study adopted a reductionist approach to investigate the relationship between the startle response to a pure tone signal and background noise. Under laboratory conditions, the startle responses of individual goldfish exposed to 120 ms tones at 250 Hz and four Sound Pressure Levels (SPLs: 115, 125, 135, 145 dB re 1 μPa) were quantified in the presence (treatment) and absence (ambient - control) of band-limited random noise (105 dB re 1 μPa).
Results and discussion: when observing the dose-response relationship, the proportion of fish that startled to the signal increased with SPL in both the treatment and control, although there was no difference between them, suggesting that the signal-to-noise ratio was not influential under the conditions tested. However, further analysis using Signal Detection Theory indicated that the was higher in the noisy treatment than the control when responding to both false alarms (startle during a pre-signal period) and hits (startle to an external stimulus during the pre-signal period). Furthermore, fish were better able to discriminate (d?) external stimuli over time (during the pre-signal period) in the treatment than control. There is a need to consider the role of background noise when designing acoustic fish deterrents that depend on the exhibition of avoidance behaviors.
Text
ffwsc-02-1320582
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 9 February 2024
Published date: 7 March 2024
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 488003
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/488003
ISSN: 2813-7124
PURE UUID: 208dcd64-691f-41fa-b30e-57e9109c4d7f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 12 Mar 2024 17:45
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:49
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Amelia Holgate
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics