Preventing suicide by jumping in public locations: a systematic review of interventions
Preventing suicide by jumping in public locations: a systematic review of interventions
Death by suicide is a significant global concern. Research and clinical practice have often focused on suicide prevention through mental health interventions and means restriction measures, but there is a lack of consideration of public health initiatives. This article details a systematic review of quantitative studies on interventions designed to prevent suicide by jumping at high-frequency sites. A total of 14 studies were included. Ten studies reported a statistically significant reduction in suicide rates after the implementation of simple measures such as barriers, fences, screen doors or nets, so these may be cost-effective ways for local authorities to prevent suicide by jumping. However, once interventions are in place at one or more jump sites, people may select a site outside the area – or another means of suicide. To limit the risk of substitution for another location, there is a need to consider interventions that encourage help-seeking, such as signs, telephones and crisis phone lines.
Chamberlain, Benjamin
9d1b3cf9-7222-4d91-b9cd-8ffa5d77ef3b
Woodnutt, Samuel
dbb6678a-2b2b-4e7c-9a12-f9d838555116
28 February 2024
Chamberlain, Benjamin
9d1b3cf9-7222-4d91-b9cd-8ffa5d77ef3b
Woodnutt, Samuel
dbb6678a-2b2b-4e7c-9a12-f9d838555116
Chamberlain, Benjamin and Woodnutt, Samuel
(2024)
Preventing suicide by jumping in public locations: a systematic review of interventions.
Mental Health Practice, 27 (2).
(doi:10.7748/mhp.2024.e1681).
Abstract
Death by suicide is a significant global concern. Research and clinical practice have often focused on suicide prevention through mental health interventions and means restriction measures, but there is a lack of consideration of public health initiatives. This article details a systematic review of quantitative studies on interventions designed to prevent suicide by jumping at high-frequency sites. A total of 14 studies were included. Ten studies reported a statistically significant reduction in suicide rates after the implementation of simple measures such as barriers, fences, screen doors or nets, so these may be cost-effective ways for local authorities to prevent suicide by jumping. However, once interventions are in place at one or more jump sites, people may select a site outside the area – or another means of suicide. To limit the risk of substitution for another location, there is a need to consider interventions that encourage help-seeking, such as signs, telephones and crisis phone lines.
Text
MHP_1681_Suicide_prevention_Chamberlain_SW_comments
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 17 October 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 28 February 2024
Published date: 28 February 2024
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 488091
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/488091
ISSN: 1465-8720
PURE UUID: 94829b04-320e-4645-bdaf-0564fe0b9e8f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 15 Mar 2024 17:35
Last modified: 28 Aug 2024 04:01
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Benjamin Chamberlain
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics