The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Does variation in swallowing organs-at-risk (SWOAR) delineation impact on predicted swallowing dysfunction for PATHOS trial patients?

Does variation in swallowing organs-at-risk (SWOAR) delineation impact on predicted swallowing dysfunction for PATHOS trial patients?
Does variation in swallowing organs-at-risk (SWOAR) delineation impact on predicted swallowing dysfunction for PATHOS trial patients?
Category: clinical trials development/outcomes

Purpose: to determine if variation between gold standard (GS) SWOAR contours and submitted on-trial outlines led to significant differences in normal tissue complication probability for physician-scored radiation-associated dysphagia at six months (NTCPD6).

Methods and materials: the dataset consisted of 78 patients recruited into arms B1 and C2 of the trial from July 2007 to February 2020 who had submitted SWOAR contours available for review. Retrospective analysis, based on visual evaluation, determined that protocol violations in SWOAR contours existed. Submitted contours (SC) (guided by the PATHOS swallowing atlas) were compared against GS contours outlined on all 78 cases by a single investigator (EH). The mean dose of the supraglottic larynx and superior pharyngeal constrictor was determined for both the GS and SC, then used to calculate the predicted NTCPD6 for each by applying the predicted model of Christianen et al.The difference between the two NTCPD6 for each case was then calculated.

Results: the mean NTCPD6 for all GS contours was 17% risk of dysphagia at six months. The difference between GS and SC mean was 0.3% (95% CI 14.8–18.6; SD 8.4; p=0.775). The individual differences for each GS versus SC ranged between −2.9% to 6.2% with only two cases having a difference greater than 4%.

Conclusion: we have shown that while protocol deviations did exist for on-trial cases, there was no statistically significant impact on predicted NTCPD6. Our findings widen the applicability of previously published data on benchmark cases to patients recruited to an ongoing UK prospective clinical trial.
0936-6555
Higgins, Emma
4b9a01b6-0fe0-431f-8b6b-7e7a8c7dcc9e
Palaniappan, Nachi
8e4cdf95-327f-4236-8198-b44c1514f128
Nabi, Zohal
35e5331e-1e50-409b-b381-147bb0adcca5
Hurt, Chris
bf8b37a0-8f08-4b47-b3f3-6fc65f7ab87f
et al.
Higgins, Emma
4b9a01b6-0fe0-431f-8b6b-7e7a8c7dcc9e
Palaniappan, Nachi
8e4cdf95-327f-4236-8198-b44c1514f128
Nabi, Zohal
35e5331e-1e50-409b-b381-147bb0adcca5
Hurt, Chris
bf8b37a0-8f08-4b47-b3f3-6fc65f7ab87f

Higgins, Emma, Palaniappan, Nachi and Nabi, Zohal , et al. (2022) Does variation in swallowing organs-at-risk (SWOAR) delineation impact on predicted swallowing dysfunction for PATHOS trial patients? Clinical Oncology, 34 (Supplement 3). (doi:10.1016/j.clon.2022.09.029).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Category: clinical trials development/outcomes

Purpose: to determine if variation between gold standard (GS) SWOAR contours and submitted on-trial outlines led to significant differences in normal tissue complication probability for physician-scored radiation-associated dysphagia at six months (NTCPD6).

Methods and materials: the dataset consisted of 78 patients recruited into arms B1 and C2 of the trial from July 2007 to February 2020 who had submitted SWOAR contours available for review. Retrospective analysis, based on visual evaluation, determined that protocol violations in SWOAR contours existed. Submitted contours (SC) (guided by the PATHOS swallowing atlas) were compared against GS contours outlined on all 78 cases by a single investigator (EH). The mean dose of the supraglottic larynx and superior pharyngeal constrictor was determined for both the GS and SC, then used to calculate the predicted NTCPD6 for each by applying the predicted model of Christianen et al.The difference between the two NTCPD6 for each case was then calculated.

Results: the mean NTCPD6 for all GS contours was 17% risk of dysphagia at six months. The difference between GS and SC mean was 0.3% (95% CI 14.8–18.6; SD 8.4; p=0.775). The individual differences for each GS versus SC ranged between −2.9% to 6.2% with only two cases having a difference greater than 4%.

Conclusion: we have shown that while protocol deviations did exist for on-trial cases, there was no statistically significant impact on predicted NTCPD6. Our findings widen the applicability of previously published data on benchmark cases to patients recruited to an ongoing UK prospective clinical trial.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 4 November 2022
Published date: 4 November 2022

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 488108
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/488108
ISSN: 0936-6555
PURE UUID: 5ea6c54a-b797-4db2-9d94-9817975dc86a
ORCID for Chris Hurt: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1206-8355

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Mar 2024 17:47
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:16

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Emma Higgins
Author: Nachi Palaniappan
Author: Zohal Nabi
Author: Chris Hurt ORCID iD
Corporate Author: et al.

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×