The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

NEOSCOPE: a randomised Phase II study of induction chemotherapy followed by either oxaliplatin/capecitabine (OXCAP) or carboplatin/paclitaxel (CarPac) based chemoradiation (CRT) as pre-operative regimen for resectable oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

NEOSCOPE: a randomised Phase II study of induction chemotherapy followed by either oxaliplatin/capecitabine (OXCAP) or carboplatin/paclitaxel (CarPac) based chemoradiation (CRT) as pre-operative regimen for resectable oesophageal adenocarcinoma.
NEOSCOPE: a randomised Phase II study of induction chemotherapy followed by either oxaliplatin/capecitabine (OXCAP) or carboplatin/paclitaxel (CarPac) based chemoradiation (CRT) as pre-operative regimen for resectable oesophageal adenocarcinoma.
Background: NEOSCOPE compared toxicity and efficacy of 2 pre-op CRT regimens.

Methods: eligibility: Resectable ACA of the oesophagus/GOJ ≥ T3 and/or ≥ N1. Randomisation: 1:1 to OXCAP-CRT (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 Day 1,15,29; capecitabine 625 mg/m2 bd on days of RT) or CarPac-CRT (Carboplatin AUC2; paclitaxel 50 mg/m2 Day 1,8,15,22,29); concurrent RT: 45Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks. Both arms received induction chemo: 2 cycles of OXCAP (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 D1, Cape 625 mg/m2D1-21, q 3wk). Surgery: 6-8 weeks after naCRT. Detailed RT and pathology quality assurance was built into the protocol. Primary end-point: pathological complete response (pCR). Secondary: toxicity, surgical morbidity/mortality, R1 rate, OS. Statistics: A pCR of 15% would not warrant further investigation but a pCR of 35% would. 76 patients (38/arm) gave 90% power and one-sided type I error of 10% meaning that either arm having ≥10 pCR out of first 38 patients would be considered for Phase III. 85 patients to be recruited (allows 10% loss to follow up).

Results: 85 patients were randomised between Oct 2013 and Feb 2015 from 17 UK centres. Patient characteristics: median age 65 yrs, Male (81%), WHO PS 0 (85%). Tumour characteristics: T3 (86%), N1 (48%), lower third/GOJ (90%), median tumour length 5.8cm. CTCAE grade 3/4 toxicity rate during CRT was OXCAP-CRT 42.1%, CarPac-CRT 52.4% (p=0.358). Protocol dose RT OXCAP-CRT 90.5%, CarPac-CRT 93%.

Conclusion: both regimens were well tolerated. CarPac-CRT passed the criteria for taking forward to a phase III study but OXCAP-RT did not.

Funding: Cancer Research UK (C44694/A14614), ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01843829, coordinated by Wales Cancer Trials Unit. Clinical trial information: NCT01843829.
1527-7755
Mukherjee, Somnath
b2ff936d-d068-48d5-9bb5-9f3431013b5b
Hurt, Chris
bf8b37a0-8f08-4b47-b3f3-6fc65f7ab87f
Gwynne, Sarah
0cbce6d8-328d-430e-9f5e-a5885deedac8
Bateman, Andrew
a851558d-8b9b-4020-b148-a239c2b26815
Griffiths, Gareth
7fd300c0-d279-4ff6-842d-aa1f2b9b864d
et al.
Mukherjee, Somnath
b2ff936d-d068-48d5-9bb5-9f3431013b5b
Hurt, Chris
bf8b37a0-8f08-4b47-b3f3-6fc65f7ab87f
Gwynne, Sarah
0cbce6d8-328d-430e-9f5e-a5885deedac8
Bateman, Andrew
a851558d-8b9b-4020-b148-a239c2b26815
Griffiths, Gareth
7fd300c0-d279-4ff6-842d-aa1f2b9b864d

Mukherjee, Somnath, Hurt, Chris and Gwynne, Sarah , et al. (2016) NEOSCOPE: a randomised Phase II study of induction chemotherapy followed by either oxaliplatin/capecitabine (OXCAP) or carboplatin/paclitaxel (CarPac) based chemoradiation (CRT) as pre-operative regimen for resectable oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 34 (4_suppl). (doi:10.1200/jco.2016.34.4_suppl.3).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: NEOSCOPE compared toxicity and efficacy of 2 pre-op CRT regimens.

Methods: eligibility: Resectable ACA of the oesophagus/GOJ ≥ T3 and/or ≥ N1. Randomisation: 1:1 to OXCAP-CRT (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 Day 1,15,29; capecitabine 625 mg/m2 bd on days of RT) or CarPac-CRT (Carboplatin AUC2; paclitaxel 50 mg/m2 Day 1,8,15,22,29); concurrent RT: 45Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks. Both arms received induction chemo: 2 cycles of OXCAP (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 D1, Cape 625 mg/m2D1-21, q 3wk). Surgery: 6-8 weeks after naCRT. Detailed RT and pathology quality assurance was built into the protocol. Primary end-point: pathological complete response (pCR). Secondary: toxicity, surgical morbidity/mortality, R1 rate, OS. Statistics: A pCR of 15% would not warrant further investigation but a pCR of 35% would. 76 patients (38/arm) gave 90% power and one-sided type I error of 10% meaning that either arm having ≥10 pCR out of first 38 patients would be considered for Phase III. 85 patients to be recruited (allows 10% loss to follow up).

Results: 85 patients were randomised between Oct 2013 and Feb 2015 from 17 UK centres. Patient characteristics: median age 65 yrs, Male (81%), WHO PS 0 (85%). Tumour characteristics: T3 (86%), N1 (48%), lower third/GOJ (90%), median tumour length 5.8cm. CTCAE grade 3/4 toxicity rate during CRT was OXCAP-CRT 42.1%, CarPac-CRT 52.4% (p=0.358). Protocol dose RT OXCAP-CRT 90.5%, CarPac-CRT 93%.

Conclusion: both regimens were well tolerated. CarPac-CRT passed the criteria for taking forward to a phase III study but OXCAP-RT did not.

Funding: Cancer Research UK (C44694/A14614), ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01843829, coordinated by Wales Cancer Trials Unit. Clinical trial information: NCT01843829.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: February 2016

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 488111
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/488111
ISSN: 1527-7755
PURE UUID: 03a9bf74-02d6-4cd7-bb15-20cafad8145e
ORCID for Chris Hurt: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1206-8355
ORCID for Gareth Griffiths: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9579-8021

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Mar 2024 17:54
Last modified: 23 Mar 2024 03:13

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Somnath Mukherjee
Author: Chris Hurt ORCID iD
Author: Sarah Gwynne
Author: Andrew Bateman
Corporate Author: et al.

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×