Circulating biomarkers and outcomes from a randomised phase 2 trial of gemcitabine versus capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic cancer
Circulating biomarkers and outcomes from a randomised phase 2 trial of gemcitabine versus capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic cancer
Background: the Phase 2 SCALOP trial compared gemcitabine with capecitabine-based consolidation chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC).
Methods: thirty-five systematically identified circulating biomarkers were analysed in plasma samples from 60 patients enroled in SCALOP. Each was measured in triplicate at baseline (prior to three cycles of gemcitabine-capecitabine induction chemotherapy) and, for a subset, prior to CRT. Association with overall survival (OS) was determined using univariable Cox regression and optimal thresholds delineating low to high values identified using time-dependent ROC curves. Independence from known prognostic factors was assessed using Spearman correlation and the Wilcoxon rank sum test prior to multivariable Cox regression modelling including independent biomarkers and known prognostic factors.
Results: baseline circulating levels of C-C motif chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5) were significantly associated with OS, independent of other clinicopathological characteristics. Patients with low circulating CCL5 had a median OS of 18.5 (95% CI 11.76–21.32) months compared to 11.3 (95% CI 9.86–15.51) months in CCL5high; hazard ratio 1.95 (95% CI 1.04–8.65; p = 0.037).
Conclusions: CCL5 is an independent prognostic biomarker in LAPC. Given the known role of CCL5 in tumour invasion, metastasis and the induction of an immunosuppressive micro-environment, targeting of CCL5-mediated pathways may offer therapeutic potential in pancreatic cancer.
Clinical trial registration: the SCALOP trial was registered with ISRCTN, number 96169987 (registered 29 May 2008).
581–586
Willenbrock, Frances
b13d994e-06d7-4da0-94a5-e4829c4763f2
Cox, Catrin M.
b9868997-ba9a-405a-83c3-8a845e09be4d
Parkes, Eileen E.
24a13eb3-6ce2-44cb-8787-d32a4521f472
Wilhelm-Benartzi, Charlotte S.
74a2bc27-ffa9-4878-91fd-3eeaf31a85b1
Abraham, Aswin G.
84de3063-2eec-4986-bbed-fe54efe7facd
Owens, Robert
bd5e88bd-f9a6-4f9f-8f06-11844440490d
Sabbagh, Ahmad
11f8552f-8871-412a-8bc6-adbde7831674
Jones, Christopher M.
2bd933d3-8f35-43b5-ae56-376e806b08fa
Hughes, Daniel L.I.
964901bb-8b9d-49ce-afe4-df8267d360b6
Maughan, Tim
32631cb0-77b1-4d79-8b75-859ed97303e8
Hurt, Christopher N.
bf8b37a0-8f08-4b47-b3f3-6fc65f7ab87f
O’Neill, Eric E.
e07a61b5-078a-466f-a369-7a621da27653
Mukherjee, Somnath
81b82408-8d54-4983-a412-81969f5edfdd
2 February 2021
Willenbrock, Frances
b13d994e-06d7-4da0-94a5-e4829c4763f2
Cox, Catrin M.
b9868997-ba9a-405a-83c3-8a845e09be4d
Parkes, Eileen E.
24a13eb3-6ce2-44cb-8787-d32a4521f472
Wilhelm-Benartzi, Charlotte S.
74a2bc27-ffa9-4878-91fd-3eeaf31a85b1
Abraham, Aswin G.
84de3063-2eec-4986-bbed-fe54efe7facd
Owens, Robert
bd5e88bd-f9a6-4f9f-8f06-11844440490d
Sabbagh, Ahmad
11f8552f-8871-412a-8bc6-adbde7831674
Jones, Christopher M.
2bd933d3-8f35-43b5-ae56-376e806b08fa
Hughes, Daniel L.I.
964901bb-8b9d-49ce-afe4-df8267d360b6
Maughan, Tim
32631cb0-77b1-4d79-8b75-859ed97303e8
Hurt, Christopher N.
bf8b37a0-8f08-4b47-b3f3-6fc65f7ab87f
O’Neill, Eric E.
e07a61b5-078a-466f-a369-7a621da27653
Mukherjee, Somnath
81b82408-8d54-4983-a412-81969f5edfdd
Willenbrock, Frances, Cox, Catrin M., Parkes, Eileen E., Wilhelm-Benartzi, Charlotte S., Abraham, Aswin G., Owens, Robert, Sabbagh, Ahmad, Jones, Christopher M., Hughes, Daniel L.I., Maughan, Tim, Hurt, Christopher N., O’Neill, Eric E. and Mukherjee, Somnath
(2021)
Circulating biomarkers and outcomes from a randomised phase 2 trial of gemcitabine versus capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic cancer.
British Journal of Cancer, 124, .
(doi:10.1038/s41416-020-01120-z).
Abstract
Background: the Phase 2 SCALOP trial compared gemcitabine with capecitabine-based consolidation chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC).
Methods: thirty-five systematically identified circulating biomarkers were analysed in plasma samples from 60 patients enroled in SCALOP. Each was measured in triplicate at baseline (prior to three cycles of gemcitabine-capecitabine induction chemotherapy) and, for a subset, prior to CRT. Association with overall survival (OS) was determined using univariable Cox regression and optimal thresholds delineating low to high values identified using time-dependent ROC curves. Independence from known prognostic factors was assessed using Spearman correlation and the Wilcoxon rank sum test prior to multivariable Cox regression modelling including independent biomarkers and known prognostic factors.
Results: baseline circulating levels of C-C motif chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5) were significantly associated with OS, independent of other clinicopathological characteristics. Patients with low circulating CCL5 had a median OS of 18.5 (95% CI 11.76–21.32) months compared to 11.3 (95% CI 9.86–15.51) months in CCL5high; hazard ratio 1.95 (95% CI 1.04–8.65; p = 0.037).
Conclusions: CCL5 is an independent prognostic biomarker in LAPC. Given the known role of CCL5 in tumour invasion, metastasis and the induction of an immunosuppressive micro-environment, targeting of CCL5-mediated pathways may offer therapeutic potential in pancreatic cancer.
Clinical trial registration: the SCALOP trial was registered with ISRCTN, number 96169987 (registered 29 May 2008).
Text
s41416-020-01120-z
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 2 October 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 26 October 2020
Published date: 2 February 2021
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 488194
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/488194
ISSN: 0007-0920
PURE UUID: 29e4c319-89f7-49b0-954e-2e9c20020ce9
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 18 Mar 2024 17:32
Last modified: 23 Mar 2024 03:13
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Frances Willenbrock
Author:
Catrin M. Cox
Author:
Eileen E. Parkes
Author:
Charlotte S. Wilhelm-Benartzi
Author:
Aswin G. Abraham
Author:
Robert Owens
Author:
Ahmad Sabbagh
Author:
Christopher M. Jones
Author:
Daniel L.I. Hughes
Author:
Tim Maughan
Author:
Christopher N. Hurt
Author:
Eric E. O’Neill
Author:
Somnath Mukherjee
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics