The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Prospective patient stratification into robust cancer-cell intrinsic subtypes from colorectal cancer biopsies: biopsy subtyping in colorectal cancer

Prospective patient stratification into robust cancer-cell intrinsic subtypes from colorectal cancer biopsies: biopsy subtyping in colorectal cancer
Prospective patient stratification into robust cancer-cell intrinsic subtypes from colorectal cancer biopsies: biopsy subtyping in colorectal cancer
Colorectal cancer (CRC) biopsies underpin accurate diagnosis, but are also relevant for patient stratification in molecularly-guided clinical trials. The consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs) and colorectal cancer intrinsic subtypes (CRISs) transcriptional signatures have potential clinical utility for improving prognostic/predictive patient assignment. However, their ability to provide robust classification, particularly in pretreatment biopsies from multiple regions or at different time points, remains untested. In this study, we undertook a comprehensive assessment of the robustness of CRC transcriptional signatures, including CRIS and CMS, using a range of tumour sampling methodologies currently employed in clinical and translational research. These include analyses using (i) laser-capture microdissected CRC tissue, (ii) eight publically available rectal cancer biopsy data sets (n = 543), (iii) serial biopsies (from AXEBeam trial, NCT00828672; n = 10), (iv) multi-regional biopsies from colon tumours (n = 29 biopsies, n = 7 tumours), and (v) pretreatment biopsies from the phase II rectal cancer trial COPERNCIUS (NCT01263171; n = 44). Compared to previous results obtained using CRC resection material, we demonstrate that CMS classification in biopsy tissue is significantly less capable of reliably classifying patient subtype (43% unknown in biopsy versus 13% unknown in resections, p = 0.0001). In contrast, there was no significant difference in classification rate between biopsies and resections when using the CRIS classifier. Additionally, we demonstrated that CRIS provides significantly better spatially- and temporally- robust classification of molecular subtypes in CRC primary tumour tissue compared to CMS (p = 0.003 and p = 0.02, respectively). These findings have potential to inform ongoing biopsy-based patient stratification in CRC, enabling robust and stable assignment of patients into clinically-informative arms of prospective multi-arm, multi-stage clinical trials.
1096-9896
19-28
Alderdice, Matthew
8a53110f-3601-484a-9cb1-2d600ef2cdbc
Richman, Susan D.
94db2308-e7d0-49ce-b4ae-a106849fe93e
Gollins, Simon
ae23ff0f-0532-4650-95bb-a31a65e80313
Hurt, Chris
bf8b37a0-8f08-4b47-b3f3-6fc65f7ab87f
et al.
Alderdice, Matthew
8a53110f-3601-484a-9cb1-2d600ef2cdbc
Richman, Susan D.
94db2308-e7d0-49ce-b4ae-a106849fe93e
Gollins, Simon
ae23ff0f-0532-4650-95bb-a31a65e80313
Hurt, Chris
bf8b37a0-8f08-4b47-b3f3-6fc65f7ab87f

Alderdice, Matthew, Richman, Susan D. and Gollins, Simon , et al. (2018) Prospective patient stratification into robust cancer-cell intrinsic subtypes from colorectal cancer biopsies: biopsy subtyping in colorectal cancer. The Journal of Pathology, 245 (1), 19-28. (doi:10.1002/path.5051).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) biopsies underpin accurate diagnosis, but are also relevant for patient stratification in molecularly-guided clinical trials. The consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs) and colorectal cancer intrinsic subtypes (CRISs) transcriptional signatures have potential clinical utility for improving prognostic/predictive patient assignment. However, their ability to provide robust classification, particularly in pretreatment biopsies from multiple regions or at different time points, remains untested. In this study, we undertook a comprehensive assessment of the robustness of CRC transcriptional signatures, including CRIS and CMS, using a range of tumour sampling methodologies currently employed in clinical and translational research. These include analyses using (i) laser-capture microdissected CRC tissue, (ii) eight publically available rectal cancer biopsy data sets (n = 543), (iii) serial biopsies (from AXEBeam trial, NCT00828672; n = 10), (iv) multi-regional biopsies from colon tumours (n = 29 biopsies, n = 7 tumours), and (v) pretreatment biopsies from the phase II rectal cancer trial COPERNCIUS (NCT01263171; n = 44). Compared to previous results obtained using CRC resection material, we demonstrate that CMS classification in biopsy tissue is significantly less capable of reliably classifying patient subtype (43% unknown in biopsy versus 13% unknown in resections, p = 0.0001). In contrast, there was no significant difference in classification rate between biopsies and resections when using the CRIS classifier. Additionally, we demonstrated that CRIS provides significantly better spatially- and temporally- robust classification of molecular subtypes in CRC primary tumour tissue compared to CMS (p = 0.003 and p = 0.02, respectively). These findings have potential to inform ongoing biopsy-based patient stratification in CRC, enabling robust and stable assignment of patients into clinically-informative arms of prospective multi-arm, multi-stage clinical trials.

Text
The Journal of Pathology - 2018 - Alderdice - Prospective patient stratification into robust cancer‐cell intrinsic subtypes - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 31 January 2018
e-pub ahead of print date: 7 February 2018
Published date: 25 March 2018

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 488220
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/488220
ISSN: 1096-9896
PURE UUID: a357849d-be90-4063-ba3a-24b35ea5c9ac
ORCID for Chris Hurt: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1206-8355

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 Mar 2024 17:57
Last modified: 23 Mar 2024 03:13

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Matthew Alderdice
Author: Susan D. Richman
Author: Simon Gollins
Author: Chris Hurt ORCID iD
Corporate Author: et al.

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×