The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Comparison of investigator-delineated gross tumour volumes and quality assurance in pancreatic cancer: analysis of the on-trial cases for the SCALOP trial

Comparison of investigator-delineated gross tumour volumes and quality assurance in pancreatic cancer: analysis of the on-trial cases for the SCALOP trial
Comparison of investigator-delineated gross tumour volumes and quality assurance in pancreatic cancer: analysis of the on-trial cases for the SCALOP trial
Background and purpose: we performed a retrospective central review of tumour outlines in patients undergoing radiotherapy in the SCALOP trial.

Materials and methods: the planning CT scans were reviewed retrospectively by a central review team, and the accuracy of investigators’ GTV (iGTV) and PTV (iPTV) was compared to the trials team-defined gold standard (gsGTV and gsPTV) using the Jaccard Conformity Index (JCI) and Geographical Miss Index (GMI). The prognostic value of JCI and GMI was also assessed. The RT plans were also reviewed against protocol-defined constraints.

Results: 60 patients with diagnostic-quality planning scans were included. The median whole volume JCI for GTV was 0.64 (IQR: 0.43–0.82), and the median GMI was 0.11 (IQR: 0.05–0.22). For PTVs, the median JCI and GMI were 0.80 (IQR: 0.71–0.88) and 0.04 (IQR: 0.02–0.12) respectively. Tumour was completely missed in 1 patient, and ⩾ 50% of the tumour was missed in 3. Patients with JCI for GTV ⩾ 0.7 had 7.12 (95% CIs: 1.83–27.67, p = 0.005) higher odds of progressing by 9 months in multivariate analysis. Major deviations in RT planning were noted in 4.5% of cases.

Conclusions: radiotherapy workshops and real-time central review of contours are required in RT trials of pancreatic cancer.
0167-8140
212-216
Fokas, Emmanouil
68703f61-647e-43c8-82f4-d8b3b74467c1
Spezi, Emiliano
523a6833-316b-4c96-92e4-1f4e1ceed662
Patel, Neel
c222e69f-5076-4686-b790-31565a044928
Hurt, Chris
bf8b37a0-8f08-4b47-b3f3-6fc65f7ab87f
et al.
Fokas, Emmanouil
68703f61-647e-43c8-82f4-d8b3b74467c1
Spezi, Emiliano
523a6833-316b-4c96-92e4-1f4e1ceed662
Patel, Neel
c222e69f-5076-4686-b790-31565a044928
Hurt, Chris
bf8b37a0-8f08-4b47-b3f3-6fc65f7ab87f

Fokas, Emmanouil, Spezi, Emiliano and Patel, Neel , et al. (2016) Comparison of investigator-delineated gross tumour volumes and quality assurance in pancreatic cancer: analysis of the on-trial cases for the SCALOP trial. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 120 (2), 212-216. (doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2016.07.002).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background and purpose: we performed a retrospective central review of tumour outlines in patients undergoing radiotherapy in the SCALOP trial.

Materials and methods: the planning CT scans were reviewed retrospectively by a central review team, and the accuracy of investigators’ GTV (iGTV) and PTV (iPTV) was compared to the trials team-defined gold standard (gsGTV and gsPTV) using the Jaccard Conformity Index (JCI) and Geographical Miss Index (GMI). The prognostic value of JCI and GMI was also assessed. The RT plans were also reviewed against protocol-defined constraints.

Results: 60 patients with diagnostic-quality planning scans were included. The median whole volume JCI for GTV was 0.64 (IQR: 0.43–0.82), and the median GMI was 0.11 (IQR: 0.05–0.22). For PTVs, the median JCI and GMI were 0.80 (IQR: 0.71–0.88) and 0.04 (IQR: 0.02–0.12) respectively. Tumour was completely missed in 1 patient, and ⩾ 50% of the tumour was missed in 3. Patients with JCI for GTV ⩾ 0.7 had 7.12 (95% CIs: 1.83–27.67, p = 0.005) higher odds of progressing by 9 months in multivariate analysis. Major deviations in RT planning were noted in 4.5% of cases.

Conclusions: radiotherapy workshops and real-time central review of contours are required in RT trials of pancreatic cancer.

Text
1-s2.0-S016781401631194X-main - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (673kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 3 July 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 3 August 2016
Published date: 26 August 2016

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 488238
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/488238
ISSN: 0167-8140
PURE UUID: bceca81e-78be-4569-9c52-af79ad6d0059
ORCID for Chris Hurt: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1206-8355

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Mar 2024 17:35
Last modified: 23 Mar 2024 03:13

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Emmanouil Fokas
Author: Emiliano Spezi
Author: Neel Patel
Author: Chris Hurt ORCID iD
Corporate Author: et al.

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×