The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

SCOPE 1: A phase II/III trial of chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer plus or minus cetuximab.

SCOPE 1: A phase II/III trial of chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer plus or minus cetuximab.
SCOPE 1: A phase II/III trial of chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer plus or minus cetuximab.
Background: SCOPE 1 is the largest multicentre trial of definitive chemo-radiotherapy (dCRT) in localised oesophageal cancer (LOC) in the UK and investigated adding cetuximab to standard cisplatin and fluoropyrimidine treatment.

Methods: patients in this phase II/III trial had LOC and been selected to receive dCRT and were randomised to receive cisplatin 60mg/m2 D1 and capecitabine 625mg/m2 daily D1-21 for 4 cycles, cycles 3 and 4 given concurrently with 50Gy in 25 fractions of RT with or without cetuximab 400mg/m2 D1 followed by 250mg/m2weekly. Recruitment continued from 02/2008 until analysis of the phase II endpoint (24 week failure free survival in the cetuximab arm, overall sample size 180: p1=0.60 and p2=0.75, α=0.05, β=0.9) in 01/2012. The phase II endpoint was not met and the IDMC recommended trial closure on the basis of futility.

Results: 258 patients were recruited. Median age 67; morphology(%) SCC:ACA 73:27; tumour location(%) upper:middle:lower 11:45:44; stage(%) I:II:III 3:37:60; reason not for surgery(%) disease extent:patient choice:comorbidity 47:38:16. Patients who received cetuximab had: higher non-haematologic toxicity (78 vs 62.8%, p=0.004; primarily dermatological (22 vs 4%) and metabolic (24% vs 11%)); a lower rate of completion of standard therapy (capecitabine 69 vs 85%, p=0.002; cisplatin 77 vs 90%, p=0.005 and radiotherapy (75 vs 86%, p=0.027); reduced failure free survival at 24 weeks (66 vs 77%), median survival (22 vs 25 months, log rank p=0.043) and 2-yr survival (41 vs 56%).

Conclusions: In SCOPE 1, disease control and survival in the standard dCRT arm is superior to any previous published multi-centre studies. The use of cetuximab was associated with greater toxicity, lower doses of dCRT and worse survival. Cetuximab cannot be recommended in combination with standard dCRT for unselected patients with oesophageal cancer. Strategies to build on these results should incorporate biomarker driven treatment and latest radiotherapy technologies to safely intensify treatment. This trial was sponsored by Velindre NHS Trust, conducted by Wales Cancer Trials Unit at Cardiff University and supported by CR-UK [grant number C20177/A7256]. Clinical trial information: 47718479.
1527-7755
Crosby, Thomas
03643ef4-1539-4a22-914d-b3da1eaa67e8
Hurt, Chris
bf8b37a0-8f08-4b47-b3f3-6fc65f7ab87f
Falk, Stephen
6bda4f5d-d5b0-4558-89d3-9e32cacf202a
Gollins, Simon
ae092a24-b3fb-4d95-b5af-802a14bd79f8
Mukherjee, Somnath
b2ff936d-d068-48d5-9bb5-9f3431013b5b
Staffurth, John
51734078-ea1f-4188-8d32-75f786921586
Ray, Ruby
fad31844-408a-4bad-ae1e-e8826035afe1
Bridgewater, John A.
22a97d4c-b9df-4f88-b413-d3193d2d14b7
Geh, Ian
203bc584-97a0-473d-a4a7-04e9b4152fe5
Cunningham, David
c7d35cdf-e964-4c60-8d1b-fd18ad81cb25
Maughan, Tim
9f5b1ca4-9ed7-4100-bf04-c4026e4b5395
Griffiths, Gareth
7fd300c0-d279-4ff6-842d-aa1f2b9b864d
et al.
Crosby, Thomas
03643ef4-1539-4a22-914d-b3da1eaa67e8
Hurt, Chris
bf8b37a0-8f08-4b47-b3f3-6fc65f7ab87f
Falk, Stephen
6bda4f5d-d5b0-4558-89d3-9e32cacf202a
Gollins, Simon
ae092a24-b3fb-4d95-b5af-802a14bd79f8
Mukherjee, Somnath
b2ff936d-d068-48d5-9bb5-9f3431013b5b
Staffurth, John
51734078-ea1f-4188-8d32-75f786921586
Ray, Ruby
fad31844-408a-4bad-ae1e-e8826035afe1
Bridgewater, John A.
22a97d4c-b9df-4f88-b413-d3193d2d14b7
Geh, Ian
203bc584-97a0-473d-a4a7-04e9b4152fe5
Cunningham, David
c7d35cdf-e964-4c60-8d1b-fd18ad81cb25
Maughan, Tim
9f5b1ca4-9ed7-4100-bf04-c4026e4b5395
Griffiths, Gareth
7fd300c0-d279-4ff6-842d-aa1f2b9b864d

Crosby, Thomas, Hurt, Chris and Falk, Stephen , et al. (2013) SCOPE 1: A phase II/III trial of chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer plus or minus cetuximab. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 31 (4_suppl). (doi:10.1200/jco.2013.31.4_suppl.lba3).

Record type: Meeting abstract

Abstract

Background: SCOPE 1 is the largest multicentre trial of definitive chemo-radiotherapy (dCRT) in localised oesophageal cancer (LOC) in the UK and investigated adding cetuximab to standard cisplatin and fluoropyrimidine treatment.

Methods: patients in this phase II/III trial had LOC and been selected to receive dCRT and were randomised to receive cisplatin 60mg/m2 D1 and capecitabine 625mg/m2 daily D1-21 for 4 cycles, cycles 3 and 4 given concurrently with 50Gy in 25 fractions of RT with or without cetuximab 400mg/m2 D1 followed by 250mg/m2weekly. Recruitment continued from 02/2008 until analysis of the phase II endpoint (24 week failure free survival in the cetuximab arm, overall sample size 180: p1=0.60 and p2=0.75, α=0.05, β=0.9) in 01/2012. The phase II endpoint was not met and the IDMC recommended trial closure on the basis of futility.

Results: 258 patients were recruited. Median age 67; morphology(%) SCC:ACA 73:27; tumour location(%) upper:middle:lower 11:45:44; stage(%) I:II:III 3:37:60; reason not for surgery(%) disease extent:patient choice:comorbidity 47:38:16. Patients who received cetuximab had: higher non-haematologic toxicity (78 vs 62.8%, p=0.004; primarily dermatological (22 vs 4%) and metabolic (24% vs 11%)); a lower rate of completion of standard therapy (capecitabine 69 vs 85%, p=0.002; cisplatin 77 vs 90%, p=0.005 and radiotherapy (75 vs 86%, p=0.027); reduced failure free survival at 24 weeks (66 vs 77%), median survival (22 vs 25 months, log rank p=0.043) and 2-yr survival (41 vs 56%).

Conclusions: In SCOPE 1, disease control and survival in the standard dCRT arm is superior to any previous published multi-centre studies. The use of cetuximab was associated with greater toxicity, lower doses of dCRT and worse survival. Cetuximab cannot be recommended in combination with standard dCRT for unselected patients with oesophageal cancer. Strategies to build on these results should incorporate biomarker driven treatment and latest radiotherapy technologies to safely intensify treatment. This trial was sponsored by Velindre NHS Trust, conducted by Wales Cancer Trials Unit at Cardiff University and supported by CR-UK [grant number C20177/A7256]. Clinical trial information: 47718479.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 February 2013

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 488241
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/488241
ISSN: 1527-7755
PURE UUID: 62e7c47f-615e-43c1-9f9c-2d54dc2d42af
ORCID for Chris Hurt: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1206-8355
ORCID for Gareth Griffiths: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9579-8021

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Mar 2024 17:35
Last modified: 23 Mar 2024 03:13

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Thomas Crosby
Author: Chris Hurt ORCID iD
Author: Stephen Falk
Author: Simon Gollins
Author: Somnath Mukherjee
Author: John Staffurth
Author: Ruby Ray
Author: John A. Bridgewater
Author: Ian Geh
Author: David Cunningham
Author: Tim Maughan
Corporate Author: et al.

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×