The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Role of nutritional status and intervention in oesophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy: outcomes from SCOPE1

Role of nutritional status and intervention in oesophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy: outcomes from SCOPE1
Role of nutritional status and intervention in oesophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy: outcomes from SCOPE1
Background: malnutrition is common in oesophageal cancer. We aimed to identify nutritional prognostic factors and survival outcomes associated with nutritional intervention in the SCOPE1 (Study of Chemoradiotherapy in OesoPhageal Cancer with or without Erbitux) trial.

Methods: two hundred and fifty eight patients were randomly allocated to definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) +/− cetuximab. Nutritional Risk Index (NRI) scores were calculated; NRI<100 identified patients at risk of malnutrition. Nutritional intervention included dietary advice, oral supplementation or major intervention (enteral feeding/tube placement). Univariable and multivariable analyses using Cox proportional hazard modelling were conducted.

Results: at baseline NRI<100 strongly predicted for reduced overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) 12.45, 95% CI 5.24–29.57; P<0.001). Nutritional intervention improved survival if provided at baseline (dietary advice (HR 0.12, P=0.004), oral supplementation (HR 0.13, P<0.001) or major intervention (HR 0.13, P=0.003)), but not if provided later in the treatment course. Cetuximab patients receiving major nutritional intervention had worse outcomes compared with controls (13 vs 28 months, P=0.003).

Conclusions: pre-treatment assessment and correction of malnutrition may improve survival outcomes in oesophageal cancer patients treated with dCRT. Nutritional Risk Index is a simple and objective screening tool to identify patients at risk of malnutrition.
0007-0920
172–177
Cox, S.
27e836ed-adc7-4ac8-8573-0540c0bc766c
Powell, C.
da9d0d81-eb39-48d4-be46-5f0e4960dd46
Carter, B.
d2aa0c6c-f9de-438d-bfca-d219f0291b6d
Hurt, C.
bf8b37a0-8f08-4b47-b3f3-6fc65f7ab87f
Mukherjee, Somnath
d9278fe6-ec80-45e0-b3ab-137e668787e8
Crosby, Thomas David Lewis
151efb37-49f4-4d86-bb45-c28a0d3b8614
Cox, S.
27e836ed-adc7-4ac8-8573-0540c0bc766c
Powell, C.
da9d0d81-eb39-48d4-be46-5f0e4960dd46
Carter, B.
d2aa0c6c-f9de-438d-bfca-d219f0291b6d
Hurt, C.
bf8b37a0-8f08-4b47-b3f3-6fc65f7ab87f
Mukherjee, Somnath
d9278fe6-ec80-45e0-b3ab-137e668787e8
Crosby, Thomas David Lewis
151efb37-49f4-4d86-bb45-c28a0d3b8614

Cox, S., Powell, C., Carter, B., Hurt, C., Mukherjee, Somnath and Crosby, Thomas David Lewis (2016) Role of nutritional status and intervention in oesophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy: outcomes from SCOPE1. British Journal of Cancer, 115, 172–177. (doi:10.1038/bjc.2016.129).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: malnutrition is common in oesophageal cancer. We aimed to identify nutritional prognostic factors and survival outcomes associated with nutritional intervention in the SCOPE1 (Study of Chemoradiotherapy in OesoPhageal Cancer with or without Erbitux) trial.

Methods: two hundred and fifty eight patients were randomly allocated to definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) +/− cetuximab. Nutritional Risk Index (NRI) scores were calculated; NRI<100 identified patients at risk of malnutrition. Nutritional intervention included dietary advice, oral supplementation or major intervention (enteral feeding/tube placement). Univariable and multivariable analyses using Cox proportional hazard modelling were conducted.

Results: at baseline NRI<100 strongly predicted for reduced overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) 12.45, 95% CI 5.24–29.57; P<0.001). Nutritional intervention improved survival if provided at baseline (dietary advice (HR 0.12, P=0.004), oral supplementation (HR 0.13, P<0.001) or major intervention (HR 0.13, P=0.003)), but not if provided later in the treatment course. Cetuximab patients receiving major nutritional intervention had worse outcomes compared with controls (13 vs 28 months, P=0.003).

Conclusions: pre-treatment assessment and correction of malnutrition may improve survival outcomes in oesophageal cancer patients treated with dCRT. Nutritional Risk Index is a simple and objective screening tool to identify patients at risk of malnutrition.

Text
bjc2016129 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (347kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 18 April 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 21 June 2016
Published date: 12 July 2016

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 488259
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/488259
ISSN: 0007-0920
PURE UUID: 1a6e645d-26e2-4182-beed-0f143eba11a1
ORCID for C. Hurt: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1206-8355

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Mar 2024 17:42
Last modified: 23 Mar 2024 03:13

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: S. Cox
Author: C. Powell
Author: B. Carter
Author: C. Hurt ORCID iD
Author: Somnath Mukherjee
Author: Thomas David Lewis Crosby

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×