The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Radiobiological determination of dose escalation and normal tissue toxicity in definitive chemoradiation therapy for esophageal cancer

Radiobiological determination of dose escalation and normal tissue toxicity in definitive chemoradiation therapy for esophageal cancer
Radiobiological determination of dose escalation and normal tissue toxicity in definitive chemoradiation therapy for esophageal cancer
Purpose: this study investigated the trade-off in tumor coverage and organ-at-risk sparing when applying dose escalation for concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CRT) of mid-esophageal cancer, using radiobiological modeling to estimate local control and normal tissue toxicity.

Methods and materials: twenty-one patients with mid-esophageal cancer were selected from the SCOPE1 database (International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials number 47718479), with a mean planning target volume (PTV) of 327 cm3. A boost volume, PTV2 (GTV + 0.5 cm margin), was created. Radiobiological modeling of tumor control probability (TCP) estimated the dose required for a clinically significant (+20%) increase in local control as 62.5 Gy/25 fractions. A RapidArc (RA) plan with a simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) to PTV2 (RA62.5) was compared to a standard dose plan of 50 Gy/25 fractions (RA50). Dose-volume metrics and estimates of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for heart and lungs were compared.

Results: clinically acceptable dose escalation was feasible for 16 of 21 patients, with significant gains (>18%) in tumor control from 38.2% (RA50) to 56.3% (RA62.5), and only a small increase in predicted toxicity: median heart NTCP 4.4% (RA50) versus 5.6% (RA62.5) P<.001 and median lung NTCP 6.5% (RA50) versus 7.5% (RA62.5) P<.001.

Conclusions: dose escalation to the GTV to improve local control is possible when overlap between PTV and organ-at-risk (<8% heart volume and <2.5% lung volume overlap for this study) generates only negligible increase in lung or heart toxicity. These predictions from radiobiological modeling should be tested in future clinical trials.
0360-3016
423-429
Warren, Samantha
5724cc3d-1b47-4866-beb9-a1d16ad48ac8
Partridge, Mike
1f4b5cae-092f-4c89-983a-31d6f680c9a0
Carrington, Rhys
9f5dc419-18d2-4e35-8521-bd077081cdd8
Hurt, Chris
bf8b37a0-8f08-4b47-b3f3-6fc65f7ab87f
Crosby, Thomas
82fd6364-ad6d-4e24-bb81-e1868258c4e6
Hawkins, Maria A.
fe46c6fb-a77c-4308-8861-48b34a65c2f3
et al.
Warren, Samantha
5724cc3d-1b47-4866-beb9-a1d16ad48ac8
Partridge, Mike
1f4b5cae-092f-4c89-983a-31d6f680c9a0
Carrington, Rhys
9f5dc419-18d2-4e35-8521-bd077081cdd8
Hurt, Chris
bf8b37a0-8f08-4b47-b3f3-6fc65f7ab87f
Crosby, Thomas
82fd6364-ad6d-4e24-bb81-e1868258c4e6
Hawkins, Maria A.
fe46c6fb-a77c-4308-8861-48b34a65c2f3

Warren, Samantha, Partridge, Mike and Carrington, Rhys , et al. (2014) Radiobiological determination of dose escalation and normal tissue toxicity in definitive chemoradiation therapy for esophageal cancer. International Journal of Radiation: Oncology, Biology, Physics, 90 (2), 423-429. (doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.06.028).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Purpose: this study investigated the trade-off in tumor coverage and organ-at-risk sparing when applying dose escalation for concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CRT) of mid-esophageal cancer, using radiobiological modeling to estimate local control and normal tissue toxicity.

Methods and materials: twenty-one patients with mid-esophageal cancer were selected from the SCOPE1 database (International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials number 47718479), with a mean planning target volume (PTV) of 327 cm3. A boost volume, PTV2 (GTV + 0.5 cm margin), was created. Radiobiological modeling of tumor control probability (TCP) estimated the dose required for a clinically significant (+20%) increase in local control as 62.5 Gy/25 fractions. A RapidArc (RA) plan with a simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) to PTV2 (RA62.5) was compared to a standard dose plan of 50 Gy/25 fractions (RA50). Dose-volume metrics and estimates of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for heart and lungs were compared.

Results: clinically acceptable dose escalation was feasible for 16 of 21 patients, with significant gains (>18%) in tumor control from 38.2% (RA50) to 56.3% (RA62.5), and only a small increase in predicted toxicity: median heart NTCP 4.4% (RA50) versus 5.6% (RA62.5) P<.001 and median lung NTCP 6.5% (RA50) versus 7.5% (RA62.5) P<.001.

Conclusions: dose escalation to the GTV to improve local control is possible when overlap between PTV and organ-at-risk (<8% heart volume and <2.5% lung volume overlap for this study) generates only negligible increase in lung or heart toxicity. These predictions from radiobiological modeling should be tested in future clinical trials.

Text
1-s2.0-S0360301614033689-main - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (574kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 6 June 2014
e-pub ahead of print date: 6 September 2014
Published date: October 2014

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 488281
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/488281
ISSN: 0360-3016
PURE UUID: 9f3262a8-e429-4c44-ade0-b0a489c81211
ORCID for Chris Hurt: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1206-8355

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Mar 2024 17:59
Last modified: 18 Jun 2024 02:08

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Samantha Warren
Author: Mike Partridge
Author: Rhys Carrington
Author: Chris Hurt ORCID iD
Author: Thomas Crosby
Author: Maria A. Hawkins
Corporate Author: et al.

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×