The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Are women ready for the new cervical screening protocol in England? A systematic review and qualitative synthesis of views about human papillomavirus testing

Are women ready for the new cervical screening protocol in England? A systematic review and qualitative synthesis of views about human papillomavirus testing
Are women ready for the new cervical screening protocol in England? A systematic review and qualitative synthesis of views about human papillomavirus testing
Background: a new protocol for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing within the UK cervical screening programme commenced in April 2011, creating new patient experiences. This is the first review to synthesise a substantial body of international evidence of women’s information needs, views and preferences regarding HPV testing. We aimed to inform the development of educational materials to promote informed choice, reduce anxiety and improve disease control.

Methods: we searched 12 bibliographic databases. Two reviewers independently screened papers and assessed study quality; disagreements were resolved by discussion. Results were extracted verbatim and authors’ findings treated as primary data. Studies were synthesised collaboratively using framework methods.

Results: we synthesised findings from 17 studies. Women had overwhelmingly negative concerns; an HPV diagnosis was daunting, had associated problems of disclosure of a sexually transmitted infection (STI), impacted on relationships and provoked fear of stigmatisation. Nevertheless, many thought HPV testing could be a preferable alternative to repeat cytology. Knowledge was poor; women struggled to interpret limited information in the context of existing knowledge about STIs and cervical cancer.

Conclusion: women are likely to be poorly informed, have limited understanding and many unanswered questions. This could increase anxiety and reduce ability to make informed choices, presenting a substantial challenge for those who design and provide information.
0007-0920
243-254
Hendry, M.
02a6f0bc-0d32-44a4-be31-e48d83be3819
Pasterfield, D.
1b944641-31df-44f7-b184-d2260629d122
Lewis, R.
e97670cb-38a6-45ad-8376-0ff675d0793b
Clements, A.
67f9bcef-1688-4c5f-8b87-0da07a119184
Damery, S.
442745d8-72fe-4ebf-88ff-86d2d499e6be
Neal, R.D.
f8289d73-c694-40d0-ac39-ceb4f70d79c6
Adke, R.
4ba9a1c4-38c2-4cdc-8cb4-7f2571392a9b
Weller, D.
14eecbd3-5275-4cde-ad04-8b5778031315
Campbell, C.
d2afcc6f-caac-4e41-b844-7e7513fba55a
Patnick, J.
755eae02-315c-41fb-baf5-eb078663fedd
Sasieni, P.
ccd8b6e7-7fb4-4a21-bc7d-d05ce721190c
Hurt, C.
bf8b37a0-8f08-4b47-b3f3-6fc65f7ab87f
Wilson, S.
e8badf23-515a-4377-b75d-fcc4b902ec4f
Wilkinson, C.
2fd8ab6f-9acb-47e8-aa90-9c152e899a5f
et al.
Hendry, M.
02a6f0bc-0d32-44a4-be31-e48d83be3819
Pasterfield, D.
1b944641-31df-44f7-b184-d2260629d122
Lewis, R.
e97670cb-38a6-45ad-8376-0ff675d0793b
Clements, A.
67f9bcef-1688-4c5f-8b87-0da07a119184
Damery, S.
442745d8-72fe-4ebf-88ff-86d2d499e6be
Neal, R.D.
f8289d73-c694-40d0-ac39-ceb4f70d79c6
Adke, R.
4ba9a1c4-38c2-4cdc-8cb4-7f2571392a9b
Weller, D.
14eecbd3-5275-4cde-ad04-8b5778031315
Campbell, C.
d2afcc6f-caac-4e41-b844-7e7513fba55a
Patnick, J.
755eae02-315c-41fb-baf5-eb078663fedd
Sasieni, P.
ccd8b6e7-7fb4-4a21-bc7d-d05ce721190c
Hurt, C.
bf8b37a0-8f08-4b47-b3f3-6fc65f7ab87f
Wilson, S.
e8badf23-515a-4377-b75d-fcc4b902ec4f
Wilkinson, C.
2fd8ab6f-9acb-47e8-aa90-9c152e899a5f

Hendry, M., Pasterfield, D. and Lewis, R. , et al. (2012) Are women ready for the new cervical screening protocol in England? A systematic review and qualitative synthesis of views about human papillomavirus testing. British Journal of Cancer, 107, 243-254. (doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.256).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: a new protocol for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing within the UK cervical screening programme commenced in April 2011, creating new patient experiences. This is the first review to synthesise a substantial body of international evidence of women’s information needs, views and preferences regarding HPV testing. We aimed to inform the development of educational materials to promote informed choice, reduce anxiety and improve disease control.

Methods: we searched 12 bibliographic databases. Two reviewers independently screened papers and assessed study quality; disagreements were resolved by discussion. Results were extracted verbatim and authors’ findings treated as primary data. Studies were synthesised collaboratively using framework methods.

Results: we synthesised findings from 17 studies. Women had overwhelmingly negative concerns; an HPV diagnosis was daunting, had associated problems of disclosure of a sexually transmitted infection (STI), impacted on relationships and provoked fear of stigmatisation. Nevertheless, many thought HPV testing could be a preferable alternative to repeat cytology. Knowledge was poor; women struggled to interpret limited information in the context of existing knowledge about STIs and cervical cancer.

Conclusion: women are likely to be poorly informed, have limited understanding and many unanswered questions. This could increase anxiety and reduce ability to make informed choices, presenting a substantial challenge for those who design and provide information.

Text
bjc2012256 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (363kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 11 May 2012
e-pub ahead of print date: 14 June 2012
Published date: July 2012

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 488282
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/488282
ISSN: 0007-0920
PURE UUID: 9cae5d45-8728-492d-ae51-6f93ddb75e6b
ORCID for C. Hurt: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1206-8355

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Mar 2024 17:59
Last modified: 23 Mar 2024 03:13

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: M. Hendry
Author: D. Pasterfield
Author: R. Lewis
Author: A. Clements
Author: S. Damery
Author: R.D. Neal
Author: R. Adke
Author: D. Weller
Author: C. Campbell
Author: J. Patnick
Author: P. Sasieni
Author: C. Hurt ORCID iD
Author: S. Wilson
Author: C. Wilkinson
Corporate Author: et al.

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×