The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The diagnostic accuracy of three home-monitoring vision tests to detect active neovascular age-related macular degeneration during the post-treatment monitoring phase: MONARCH study

The diagnostic accuracy of three home-monitoring vision tests to detect active neovascular age-related macular degeneration during the post-treatment monitoring phase: MONARCH study
The diagnostic accuracy of three home-monitoring vision tests to detect active neovascular age-related macular degeneration during the post-treatment monitoring phase: MONARCH study
Importance: most neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treatments involve long-term follow-up of disease activity. Home-monitoring would reduce the burden on patients and their caregivers, and release clinic capacity.

Objective: the study aimed to evaluate three vision home-monitoring tests for patients to use to detect active nAMD compared to diagnosing active nAMD at hospital follow-up. during the post-treatments monitoring phase.

Design: Diagnostic Test Accuracy (DTA) Study

Setting: six UK Hospital Eye Clinics

Participants: patients aged 50 years or above, with at least one eye first treated for active nAMD at least ≥ 6 months to a maximum of 42 months before approach . Participants were stratified by time since starting treatment.

Main outcome measure: estimated area under receiver operating curves (AUROCS). The study had 90% power to detect a difference of 0.06, or 80% power to detect a difference of 0.05, if the AUROC for 2 tests was 0.75.

Methods: the reference standard was detection of active nAMD by an ophthalmologist at hospital follow-up. The three home-monitoring tests evaluated were: (i) KeepSight Journal (KSJ): paper-based near vision tests presented as word puzzles; (ii) MyVisionTrack® (mVT®) application (app), viewed on iPod TouchTM device; (iii) MultiBit (MBT) app, viewed on an iPod TouchTM device. Participants were asked to test weekly; mVT and MBT scores were transmitted automatically and KSJ scores were returned to the research office six-monthly. Raw scores between hospital follow-ups were summarizeized as averages.

Results: 297 patients took part. The mean age (SD) was 74.9 (6.6) years. At least one hospital follow-up was available for 312 study eyes in 259 participants (1,549 complete visits). Median home-monitoring testing frequency was 3 times/month. Estimated areas under receiver operating curves (AUROCs) were <0.6 for all home-monitoring tests, and only the KSJ summary score was associated with lesion activity (OR=3.48, 95% confidence interval 1.09-11.13, p=0.036).

Conclusions and relevance: no home-monitoring vision test evaluated provided satisfactory diagnostic accuracy to identify active nAMD diagnosed in hospital eye service follow-up clinics. Implementing any of these evaluated tests, with ophthalmologists only reviewing test positives, would mean most active lesions were missed, risking unnecessary sight loss.
2044-6055
Hogg, Ruth E.
ce459eb4-c6d9-40e4-8539-ebafab779a2a
Sivaprasad, Sobha
7cd590d6-18f0-4ae1-8ace-4b35833c2f03
Wickens, Robin
3fae8758-ef16-4dfa-aabb-bf7b145458f8
O'Connor, Sean Robin
81468f49-75c7-4b63-8065-baf88601cf09
Gidman, Eleanor
b94dca60-a02a-4b33-9a4d-a2f9273dbbf6
Ward, Elizabeth
9bfa3e83-dfa3-4db3-84f3-768607056592
Treanor, Charlene
cfd2eb9e-4ae3-4bb9-a4f4-f36b5f6fc5a7
Peto, Tunde
e5511bbd-2ef8-4465-a2b3-46c8cc3ce63e
Burton, Ben J.L.
d7836878-69ad-4378-a6d4-12cc639308a0
Knox, Paul
5238d5d0-bab8-43d2-b51c-eb2202968951
Lotery, Andrew J.
5ecc2d2d-d0b4-468f-ad2c-df7156f8e514
Donnelly, Michael
09f59c97-bf4e-4772-99fd-f1ba729c97a0
Rogers, Chris A.
1074c268-aced-471a-95fe-ad3e0067e605
Reeves, Barnaby C.
2a1bbe3f-5458-4152-8937-5f326987e091
et al.
Hogg, Ruth E.
ce459eb4-c6d9-40e4-8539-ebafab779a2a
Sivaprasad, Sobha
7cd590d6-18f0-4ae1-8ace-4b35833c2f03
Wickens, Robin
3fae8758-ef16-4dfa-aabb-bf7b145458f8
O'Connor, Sean Robin
81468f49-75c7-4b63-8065-baf88601cf09
Gidman, Eleanor
b94dca60-a02a-4b33-9a4d-a2f9273dbbf6
Ward, Elizabeth
9bfa3e83-dfa3-4db3-84f3-768607056592
Treanor, Charlene
cfd2eb9e-4ae3-4bb9-a4f4-f36b5f6fc5a7
Peto, Tunde
e5511bbd-2ef8-4465-a2b3-46c8cc3ce63e
Burton, Ben J.L.
d7836878-69ad-4378-a6d4-12cc639308a0
Knox, Paul
5238d5d0-bab8-43d2-b51c-eb2202968951
Lotery, Andrew J.
5ecc2d2d-d0b4-468f-ad2c-df7156f8e514
Donnelly, Michael
09f59c97-bf4e-4772-99fd-f1ba729c97a0
Rogers, Chris A.
1074c268-aced-471a-95fe-ad3e0067e605
Reeves, Barnaby C.
2a1bbe3f-5458-4152-8937-5f326987e091

Hogg, Ruth E., Sivaprasad, Sobha and Wickens, Robin , et al. (2024) The diagnostic accuracy of three home-monitoring vision tests to detect active neovascular age-related macular degeneration during the post-treatment monitoring phase: MONARCH study. BMJ Open.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Importance: most neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treatments involve long-term follow-up of disease activity. Home-monitoring would reduce the burden on patients and their caregivers, and release clinic capacity.

Objective: the study aimed to evaluate three vision home-monitoring tests for patients to use to detect active nAMD compared to diagnosing active nAMD at hospital follow-up. during the post-treatments monitoring phase.

Design: Diagnostic Test Accuracy (DTA) Study

Setting: six UK Hospital Eye Clinics

Participants: patients aged 50 years or above, with at least one eye first treated for active nAMD at least ≥ 6 months to a maximum of 42 months before approach . Participants were stratified by time since starting treatment.

Main outcome measure: estimated area under receiver operating curves (AUROCS). The study had 90% power to detect a difference of 0.06, or 80% power to detect a difference of 0.05, if the AUROC for 2 tests was 0.75.

Methods: the reference standard was detection of active nAMD by an ophthalmologist at hospital follow-up. The three home-monitoring tests evaluated were: (i) KeepSight Journal (KSJ): paper-based near vision tests presented as word puzzles; (ii) MyVisionTrack® (mVT®) application (app), viewed on iPod TouchTM device; (iii) MultiBit (MBT) app, viewed on an iPod TouchTM device. Participants were asked to test weekly; mVT and MBT scores were transmitted automatically and KSJ scores were returned to the research office six-monthly. Raw scores between hospital follow-ups were summarizeized as averages.

Results: 297 patients took part. The mean age (SD) was 74.9 (6.6) years. At least one hospital follow-up was available for 312 study eyes in 259 participants (1,549 complete visits). Median home-monitoring testing frequency was 3 times/month. Estimated areas under receiver operating curves (AUROCs) were <0.6 for all home-monitoring tests, and only the KSJ summary score was associated with lesion activity (OR=3.48, 95% confidence interval 1.09-11.13, p=0.036).

Conclusions and relevance: no home-monitoring vision test evaluated provided satisfactory diagnostic accuracy to identify active nAMD diagnosed in hospital eye service follow-up clinics. Implementing any of these evaluated tests, with ophthalmologists only reviewing test positives, would mean most active lesions were missed, risking unnecessary sight loss.

Text
Main_Paper-MONARCH_final_Revision_merged2 - Author's Original
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

In preparation date: 31 January 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 488289
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/488289
ISSN: 2044-6055
PURE UUID: 50ec3d31-345f-40e7-8c81-a938329e1dff
ORCID for Andrew J. Lotery: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5541-4305

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Mar 2024 18:03
Last modified: 20 Mar 2024 02:38

Export record

Contributors

Author: Ruth E. Hogg
Author: Sobha Sivaprasad
Author: Robin Wickens
Author: Sean Robin O'Connor
Author: Eleanor Gidman
Author: Elizabeth Ward
Author: Charlene Treanor
Author: Tunde Peto
Author: Ben J.L. Burton
Author: Paul Knox
Author: Michael Donnelly
Author: Chris A. Rogers
Author: Barnaby C. Reeves
Corporate Author: et al.

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×