The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Barriers and facilitators to use of digital health tools by healthcare practitioners and their patients, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multi-methods study

Barriers and facilitators to use of digital health tools by healthcare practitioners and their patients, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multi-methods study
Barriers and facilitators to use of digital health tools by healthcare practitioners and their patients, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multi-methods study
Objectives: to explore how healthcare practitioners (HCPs) made decisions about the implementation of digital health technologies (DHTs) in their clinical practice before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Design: a multimethods study, comprising semistructured interviews conducted prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, supplemented with an online survey that was conducted during the pandemic with a different sample, to ensure the qualitative findings remained relevant within the rapidly changing healthcare context. Participants were recruited through HCP networks, snowballing and social media. Data were analysed thematically.

Setting: phone interviews and online survey.

Participants: HCPs represented a range of professions from primary and secondary care across England, with varied socioeconomic deprivation.

Results: 24 HCPs were interviewed, and 16 HCPs responded to the survey. In the interviews, HCPs described three levels where decisions were made, which determined who would have access to what DHTs: health organisation, HCP and patient levels. These decisions resulted in the unequal implementation of DHTs across health services, created barriers for HCPs using DHTs in their practice and influenced HCPs' decisions on which patients to supply DHTs with. In the survey, HCPs described being provided support to overcome some of the barriers at the organisation and HCP level during the pandemic. However, they cited similar concerns to pre-pandemic about barriers patients faced using DHTs (eg, digital literacy). In the absence of centralised guidance on how to manage these barriers, health services made their own decisions about how to adapt their services for those who struggled with DHTs.

Conclusions: decision-making at the health organisation, HCP and patient levels influences inequalities in access to DHTs for HCPs and patients. The mobilisation of centralised information and resources during the pandemic can be viewed as good practice for reducing barriers to use of DHTs for HCPs. However, attention must also be paid to reducing barriers to accessing DHTs for patients.
2044-6055
Turnbull, Sophie Louise
135b4809-1046-4b61-803d-b8baeecefc6c
Dack, Charlotte
d3b4f40f-0c5d-4117-9aaa-e500976d4af5
Lei, Jiedi
ddd58cc5-b95a-4533-915f-ef420961c8e7
Aksu, Irem
a571443f-3ad7-49c0-a3ec-0cf50570bc97
Grant, Sabrina
1512e835-18b7-4a6b-b831-25f61361d472
Lasseter, Gemma
aa70ca8c-0535-4c15-a46a-5b9d990b8dab
Silarova, Barbora
dba4f4a1-0270-49a2-b523-d88e6ba595c0
Ainsworth, Ben
b02d78c3-aa8b-462d-a534-31f1bf164f81
Turnbull, Sophie Louise
135b4809-1046-4b61-803d-b8baeecefc6c
Dack, Charlotte
d3b4f40f-0c5d-4117-9aaa-e500976d4af5
Lei, Jiedi
ddd58cc5-b95a-4533-915f-ef420961c8e7
Aksu, Irem
a571443f-3ad7-49c0-a3ec-0cf50570bc97
Grant, Sabrina
1512e835-18b7-4a6b-b831-25f61361d472
Lasseter, Gemma
aa70ca8c-0535-4c15-a46a-5b9d990b8dab
Silarova, Barbora
dba4f4a1-0270-49a2-b523-d88e6ba595c0
Ainsworth, Ben
b02d78c3-aa8b-462d-a534-31f1bf164f81

Turnbull, Sophie Louise, Dack, Charlotte, Lei, Jiedi, Aksu, Irem, Grant, Sabrina, Lasseter, Gemma, Silarova, Barbora and Ainsworth, Ben (2024) Barriers and facilitators to use of digital health tools by healthcare practitioners and their patients, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multi-methods study. BMJ Open, 14 (3), [e080055]. (doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080055).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives: to explore how healthcare practitioners (HCPs) made decisions about the implementation of digital health technologies (DHTs) in their clinical practice before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Design: a multimethods study, comprising semistructured interviews conducted prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, supplemented with an online survey that was conducted during the pandemic with a different sample, to ensure the qualitative findings remained relevant within the rapidly changing healthcare context. Participants were recruited through HCP networks, snowballing and social media. Data were analysed thematically.

Setting: phone interviews and online survey.

Participants: HCPs represented a range of professions from primary and secondary care across England, with varied socioeconomic deprivation.

Results: 24 HCPs were interviewed, and 16 HCPs responded to the survey. In the interviews, HCPs described three levels where decisions were made, which determined who would have access to what DHTs: health organisation, HCP and patient levels. These decisions resulted in the unequal implementation of DHTs across health services, created barriers for HCPs using DHTs in their practice and influenced HCPs' decisions on which patients to supply DHTs with. In the survey, HCPs described being provided support to overcome some of the barriers at the organisation and HCP level during the pandemic. However, they cited similar concerns to pre-pandemic about barriers patients faced using DHTs (eg, digital literacy). In the absence of centralised guidance on how to manage these barriers, health services made their own decisions about how to adapt their services for those who struggled with DHTs.

Conclusions: decision-making at the health organisation, HCP and patient levels influences inequalities in access to DHTs for HCPs and patients. The mobilisation of centralised information and resources during the pandemic can be viewed as good practice for reducing barriers to use of DHTs for HCPs. However, attention must also be paid to reducing barriers to accessing DHTs for patients.

Text
Main Document - Accepted Manuscript
Download (430kB)
Text
e080055.full - Version of Record
Download (349kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 21 December 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 5 March 2024
Published date: 5 March 2024
Additional Information: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 488313
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/488313
ISSN: 2044-6055
PURE UUID: 255a8ecb-bced-408f-a936-510e119c794d
ORCID for Ben Ainsworth: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5098-1092

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Mar 2024 18:39
Last modified: 02 May 2024 01:41

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sophie Louise Turnbull
Author: Charlotte Dack
Author: Jiedi Lei
Author: Irem Aksu
Author: Sabrina Grant
Author: Gemma Lasseter
Author: Barbora Silarova
Author: Ben Ainsworth ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×