Overwhelmed by privacy
Overwhelmed by privacy
Much has been written about privacy attitudes and how private citizens make
decisions to share their personal data. The privacy paradox, for instance, maintains that despite claims to be concerned about the privacy of their data, private citizen behaviour seems to contradict such claims especially online. A series of well-known consumer surveys in the USA identified three behavioural types derived from statements relating to three constructs: trust in those receiving the personal data, the individual’s control over their data, and the governance structures in place to protect personal data. Recently, regulation such
as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe formalised an assumption that private citizens seek control over privacy by defining a comprehensive list of rights and thereby encouraging trust in those processing their data. Nonetheless, others maintain that such attempts at empowering private individuals do not reflect their expectations nor common data sharing practice. Based on a survey derived from a series of workshops with a group interested in patient data privacy, 466 private citizens in the UK shared their attitudes to data sharing and data protection structures. What they discussed compared well with provisions of the GDPR: regulation seems to capture private citizen concerns.
Extending the analysis via exploratory factor analysis with 444 response sets, however, we provide evidence that private citizens continue to be overwhelmed by privacy and may not appreciate how much control they really have. Indeed, they report lacking agency regarding their data. Further, data sharing decisions appear to be the result of a pragmatic motivation to achieve a specific task. We conclude that private citizens do not believe they maintain control of their data but act as privacy pragmatists, basing data sharing decisions on transactional motivations and soft trust rather than any statutory rights as set out in data protection regulation.
Pickering, Brian
225088d0-729e-4f17-afe2-1ad1193ccae6
Baker, Katie
7ee49741-b8ae-4208-b599-e77f00668c95
Kirby, Sarah
9be57c1b-5ab7-4444-829e-d8e5dbe2370b
Carmichael, Laura
3f71fb73-581b-43c3-a261-a6627994c96e
Pickering, Brian
225088d0-729e-4f17-afe2-1ad1193ccae6
Baker, Katie
7ee49741-b8ae-4208-b599-e77f00668c95
Kirby, Sarah
9be57c1b-5ab7-4444-829e-d8e5dbe2370b
Carmichael, Laura
3f71fb73-581b-43c3-a261-a6627994c96e
Pickering, Brian, Baker, Katie, Kirby, Sarah and Carmichael, Laura
(2024)
Overwhelmed by privacy.
Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality.
(Submitted)
Abstract
Much has been written about privacy attitudes and how private citizens make
decisions to share their personal data. The privacy paradox, for instance, maintains that despite claims to be concerned about the privacy of their data, private citizen behaviour seems to contradict such claims especially online. A series of well-known consumer surveys in the USA identified three behavioural types derived from statements relating to three constructs: trust in those receiving the personal data, the individual’s control over their data, and the governance structures in place to protect personal data. Recently, regulation such
as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe formalised an assumption that private citizens seek control over privacy by defining a comprehensive list of rights and thereby encouraging trust in those processing their data. Nonetheless, others maintain that such attempts at empowering private individuals do not reflect their expectations nor common data sharing practice. Based on a survey derived from a series of workshops with a group interested in patient data privacy, 466 private citizens in the UK shared their attitudes to data sharing and data protection structures. What they discussed compared well with provisions of the GDPR: regulation seems to capture private citizen concerns.
Extending the analysis via exploratory factor analysis with 444 response sets, however, we provide evidence that private citizens continue to be overwhelmed by privacy and may not appreciate how much control they really have. Indeed, they report lacking agency regarding their data. Further, data sharing decisions appear to be the result of a pragmatic motivation to achieve a specific task. We conclude that private citizens do not believe they maintain control of their data but act as privacy pragmatists, basing data sharing decisions on transactional motivations and soft trust rather than any statutory rights as set out in data protection regulation.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
In preparation date: 18 March 2024
Submitted date: 29 May 2024
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 488332
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/488332
ISSN: 2575-8527
PURE UUID: d8da7018-fc7a-4ae3-82bf-5fe23e709bdc
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 20 Mar 2024 17:53
Last modified: 30 May 2024 01:45
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Katie Baker
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics